Digg It |   Del.icio.us |   Printer Friendly |   PDF |   Email

Building Your ETF Portfolio, BRIC by BRIC

Thursday, July 9, 2009 | Price Headley

Rating:

By now, in the search for portfolio opportunities globally, you've likely heard the term "BRIC" used to describe the fast-growing markets in Brazil, Russia, India and China.

As stock markets around the world have shown a nice recovery in the past several months, including the United States, it's still useful to look at some big-picture, longer-term trends.

Based on demographics on population trends, China and India (often referred to as "ChIndia") appear to offer some of the most attractive opportunities, while Brazil and then Russia also merit long-term consideration as commodity-driven countries.

Let's explore these Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) ideas further.

The Emerging Economic Dominance of China, India

This is hardly a new idea, in that the billions of individuals who are moving up thanks to the outsourcing trends from the United States and other relatively higher-cost labor pools (what I call "labor arbitrage" from big corporations looking to lower their costs with cheaper labor in these huge, upwardly mobile populations) will help to drive economic growth at a much faster pace than we can expect domestically.

ChIndia's massive populations present the enticing prospect of billions of people entering the middle and lower-middle classes for the first time, and global corporations feeding off the prospect of a surge in consumer spending as these personal income levels rise dramatically in coming years

At the same time, I prefer the BRIC ETFs as a way to play these global trends, as the the individually listed companies may be more-volatile and less-certain due to the accounting and shareholder rights for these stocks, which are not on the same level as our own current rules here in the United States.

Stocks from these countries have declined dramatically since late 2007, as global growth prospects cooled. But China's annual growth rate went from dropping 9% or 10% to being a positive 5% or 6% currently. So, you'll still see plenty more growth there than in the United States going forward. 

For the purposes of today's discussion, we will use the following ETFs as proxies for China and India:  FXI (the iShares Xinhua China 25 Index) and PIN (PowerShares India).  The SPY and QQQQ ETFs are used to track the S&P 500 Index and Nasdaq-100 Index, respectively, in the United States.

When the market bottom started to form in March, these two "fallen dragons" began to show impressive outperformance.  The resurgence of China began on March 1, several days before the markets bottomed in the U.S. around March 9.  India's surge in performance began around March 23, when it began to diverge from the U.S. indices ... the PIN basically matched the FXI performance over this time frame.

The outperformance of these two emerging giants would seem to show that they are leading the anticipated world economic "recovery" ... or what may be called a stabilization phase, in my view, after the dark days of the fall of 2008.

Continued strength by FXI and PIN would bode well for a continued market rally here.

Hard Commodities Will Experience a Continued Resurgence in Popularity

With the possible exception of oil (because gasoline literally could become worthless due to technology and, quite honestly, I hope it does in order to stabilize world politics, among other reasons), commodities are poised to gain value in the coming years, or at least hold value in relation to many broader stock market indices.

The main reason for this is the total devaluation of paper money by governments worldwide. Because the dollar and every other currency in the world is printed on a piece of paper, actual commodities will gain in relative value (and I'm not just talking about gold). Once again, the possible exception is crude oil, but I may be wrong there.

The other main reason is basically "it is what it is" -- meaning, these are actual, tangible products that have an inherent value and multiple uses. For example, if society completely denigrates to Stone-Age economics, lumber (wood) will still have a value in order to build shelters (obviously an extreme example).

Who does this benefit? Resource-rich countries likes Brazil, Canada, Russia, Argentina, et al. And savvy ETF (and ETF option) players, as well.

Does This Theory Hold Water? You Bet it Does...


Water is included in this as a commodity ... drinkable and usable water will be a growing issue in the future, and multiple investment opportunities abound there as well.

At the same time, the volatility of these global economies and stock markets allows us to trade both sides. The RSX (Russia Index) is one we have a bear position on right now, helping us benefit from the 14% decline in the Russian ETF in the last week.

You also want to look for divergences in relative performance. For example,  in FXI vs. RSX recently -- China (FXI) remains strong from a relative performance analysis while Russia (RSX) is breaking down. 

For those individual investors who want some BRIC exposure without having to pick one of the four major countries, you can also consider buying a BRIC ETF that tracks all of these global economies, such as the Claymore/BNY BRIC ETF (EEB).

Here, you get a mix of these countries, with the EEB's latest list of top 10 holdings (from Yahoo! Finance) showing heavier exposure to Brazil and China.
 


Regardless of which BRIC exposure you decide to start building, I'm confident that investors who can handle a bit more volatility will see greater longer-term growth by including a solid BRIC foundation.



(Please let us know what you think about Price Headley's article.)
Rate his article here »



Price Headley
Founder
BigTrends.com


Rate this article
Thank you for your vote!

3 Comments

Post your own comment
  • Most recent
  • 1
  • Oldest
  1. Vincent (17 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    The suggestion that oil may become worthless is an absurdity beyond belief, unless you are talking hundreds of years. What new technology exists, that will replace all the myriad uses that oil has. The fact that the author only refers to gasoline is a sign of gross ignorance, although even in this area there is no viable alternative that has a remote possiblility of becoming universal. What do you put in aircraft, trucks, ships and automobiles? How do you make plastics, fertilisers, textiles, a myriad of drugs? The irony of all this is that oil is the one commodity that is the LEAST able to be replaced. There is more chance that copper would become worthless before oil: you only have to think fibe optics here.
  2. alberto (17 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Comphanhia Vale do Rio Doce is the old name and has been changed to Vale. So the two ADRs are the same stock. New symbol is VALE. The current holdings list is available at http://www.claymore.com/etf/fund/eeb/holdings.
  3. CY (17 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    I find it ironic that you first mention that oil could become worthless and go on to recommend a BRIC ETF with a few petroleum companies. I agree that oil could fall in value in time, wouldnt that adversely affect these companies in EEB ?
  • Most recent
  • 1
  • Oldest

Add Your Comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed.

Please fill in the missing field(s).

Important: To comment on Tycoon Report articles, you must first log in. If you are a paying customer of Tycoon, you may use the same login and password that you use normally. If you do not yet have a login, please take a moment to register below. It’s free, and you only need to do it once.

Register

(email address and password information will NOT be displayed publicly)

Name *

Email *

Password *

Subscribe to The Tycoon Report
By registering, you agree to our terms of service.

Already a member? Log in!

(you will not be taken away from this page)

Email *

Password *

Remember?

Forgot Password?




Important Notice to all stock spammers, scammers and penny stock pump-and-dumpers: You will get no respect here. Don’t bother submitting fraudulent or misleading information in the guise of an article, because we will remove it. Any piece of content submitted on this site can be removed at the sole discretion of the Tycoon staff.