What does it mean?
Tuesday, February 5, 2008 | Helmut Is this Spam?I posted this question previously but somehow the article never appeared.
Deposit-taking institutions must have capital reserves that are a small proportion of the deposits they have taken, currently approximately 5%. For example, on 5 December 2007 the monetary base was $mil824,857 and required reserves were $mil42,170. Total reserves were actually $mil43,993, of which $43,794 was non-borrowed.
The reserves can comprise non-borrowed and borrowed amounts, because in times of dire stress, the Federal Reserve will lend money to depository institutions who come up a bit short in their capital account, for which it charges a small interest, currently 3% p.a.
In the past, the worst period was 1984, when 32% of reserves had to be borrowed by deposit-taking institutions. The repercussions of that borrowing played out until 1987.
Today, we have an unprecedented situation:
On 19 December 2007, of total reserves of $mil40,834, $mil37,001 was non-borrowed.
On 2 January 2008, of total reserves of $mil44,040, $mil8,733 was non-borrowed.
On 16 January 2008, of total reserves of $mil41,574, only $mil198 was non-borrowed.
And on 30 January 2008 (provisionally), minus $mil8,751 was non-borrowed.
In other words, depository institutions have gone from plus $mil43,794 to minus $mil8,751 in less than two months, a loss of $mil52,545!
The possible repercussions of this situation are beyond my imagination. Would one of the Tycoon experts be able to analyze it?
Data obtained from http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h3/Current/


