Digg It |   Del.icio.us |   Printer Friendly |   PDF |   Email

Oil: The Beginning of a Long Term Downtrend?

Friday, August 1, 2008 | John M Is this Spam?

Rating:

We are continuously faced with expectations of $200 a barrel oil and gas prices hitting 6, 7, even 8 dollars a gallon by the end of the summer.  Much of our lives are affected by the price of oil, making it easy for one to be “hysterical” about rising prices. Nevertheless, major oil industry analysts believe oil is significantly overvalued at a time when the media is losing all sense of ability to be objective while analyzing oil’s high valuations. Whom to believe?

Is last week's drop in oil prices a sign of things to come or just a correction before another run on its way to $200 a barrel?  I personally believe that oil is beginning a new trend, and has created an opportunity to take bearish positions. (More on these later!)

About two months ago I began telling my parents, friends, and anyone who would listen, “not to worry, oil is extremely overvalued and, sooner rather than later, prices will begin to fall and continue downward for a long time to come.”  My mother is really feeling the effects of high oil prices and wanted to believe me.  She had a hard time believing I was right and that all the “smart people” on TV were wrong.  Understandable.  (We’ll deal with them in a minute.)

“Smart people” can tell you why unrealistic valuations are sustainable this time around.  “Smart people” have the foresight to understand why the creation of the train, car, plane, Internet, and now dwindling oil supplies would mark a fundamental change in investment evaluations.

But then a funny thing happens: each of these life-changing events was followed by a bear market ... every time.

Let's take a quick look at how oil has been trading lately.

Notice the volume for the past two months.  Down days are trading on increasingly heavy volume, especially last week.  We may have a bounce here coinciding with oil’s next level of resistance made back in June.  This bounce I believe will be followed by a downward trend through the support level toward $110 where the next level of support will be found.

Back In January I began to notice bearish signs.  Specifically, MACD was displaying a negative divergence or “lower highs” when Oil was hitting “higher highs” as Chris Rowe demonstrates in The Trend Rider.  You can see another one in the beginning of July.  Oil is going up, up, up as momentum goes down, down, down. (Below)


Notice how MACD crossed the Moving Average, reversing into a bearish trend in early June followed by heavy upwards resistance.  Oil continued up through June and Most of July.  Finally, MACD and the Moving Average broke down as Oil lost $24 a barrel, pushing the Moving Average and MACD further and further apart (below).


Moving beyond technicals, oil barrels were down over 16% last week from $147 to $123.  Outstanding oil futures contracts dropped to the lowest levels in 16 months, signaling that prices are too high for institutional futures traders.

There have been 13 consecutive weeks of falling demand in the U.S., leading oil imports to their lowest level since 2003.  In the first 6 months of 2008, oil consumption is down 3.3% and major oil analysts are cutting their forecast for oil consumption in 2009.

Every time I turn on the TV, 90% of the commercials are about oil, energy independence, and the green movement.  There are more commercials related to energy than there were brokerage commercials during the tech boom.  Scary!

There is a global energy movement, and this movement is international as well as bipartisan.  The number one villain of the energy movement: OIL.  Make no mistake, the Western World is bent on limiting, if not eliminating the use of oil.

The left supports this on environmentalist grounds, the right supports it on domestic energy production, and both sides support freedom from foreign oil, especially moving trillions of dollars to the Middle East.  Both parties are further being forced on board by the constant public outcry over rising gasoline prices.

Even oil companies are taking advantage of this historical opportunity to develop alternative sources of energy.  This is unprecedented; oil companies have historically blocked alternative development for obvious reasons.

There will be increased domestic oil production, a wide nuclear power program, and breakthroughs in alternative energy products.  And this is just for starters.  How about cars that run on water for dessert?  Think I am joking?  Take a look!

Either way, oil is under attack, heavy attack.

What about the constant negativity surrounding oil prices from the media?  This is powerful TV; nevertheless, Oil “hysteria” is not based on reality.

Let's deal with the media’s distortions right now!

1) "Demand for oil is up and is going to keep on rising as demand increases from developing nations, specifically, China and India.”

In actuality, demand is down globally over the past 6 months.  The emerging world, including China, has slowed economically along with the West.

China’s Olympic push is creating unsustainable energy demands.  Particularly, the demands resulting from Olympic based infrastructure projects.  The Chinese have also decided to increase their Oil reserves by 50% in preparation for the games, making sure there are no energy related issues.

As the Olympics come to an end, the Chinese will then allow their oil reserves to dwindle back to pre-Olympic levels.

It is thus reasonable to infer that in 2009 oil demand will be significantly down globally.

2) "There is no such analysis as overvalued oil.  Oil is a 'different' situation, the world lives on it, inventories are low, world supply is dwindling, and demand is growing.”

Hence, validated escalation of oil prices without respect for the actual evaluation of supply and demand.

This is absolutely false!  Oil is like every other investment commodity or whatever else you want to call it.  It will go through bull (expansion) markets, and Bear (contraction) markets based on high and low valuations, period.  When the valuations become too high based on supply and demand, they will fall.  “Hysterics” may drive the price up for awhile, but sooner or later institutions will no longer support this.  The media cried the same story during the 70’s oil “crisis”.

3) "Speculators and oil companies are further driving the price of oil, unethically or even illegally, and there is no way to stop them without new laws.”

Well, I for one hear this as talking points for most politicians.  But I have a question for our dear representatives!

If oil companies and speculators have the ability to raise gas prices artificially, why did they wait until now to do it?  Meaning, for the last 30 years why was oil so cheap, and oil companies barely profitable?

The answer is simple: they simply don't have this ability.  Speculators are riding the bull market just like every other trader would.  The truth is, the government wants to put the focus on others.

Cheap gas coincided with a time when the environmentalist movement was picking up steam.  Environmentally dangerous oil and nuclear power were the main targets.  If we could clean up the country and import oil cheaply, who wouldn’t back this?

But as technology changed and oil was no longer dirty (Oil spills are almost obsolete), and nuclear energy became the cleanest, most efficient way to develop energy, we as a country did not change with the times.  Here at home, there was just no reason to develop domestic energy.

Even as world demand increased, the U.S. kept its pro-environment, anti-domestic energy posture.  Finally the “chickens came home to roost” and prices took off.  Now they want to blame someone -- Oil companies, speculators, and OPEC.  The Federal government alone makes 18 cents per gallon of gas sold at the pump -- more than the oil company itself.  OPEC should pump more oil, yet we are unwilling to do the same?

With no relief from politicians, Americans have created the energy movement to fight high gas prices, a dirty environment, and gain freedom from foreign oil.  The energy movement is here to stay, and oil has seen its heyday.

So if demand is declining, and oil was already way overvalued, why should the price continue to rise?  What is going to happen when the western world decreases its use of oil by 10, 15, even 25%?  Down, down, down to say the least.

The lesson learned here is similar to the lesson learned over and over again by investors: bulls come and go!  Make your investment positions based on facts and informed outlooks.  Do the research and form your own educated position.

"Smart people" may laugh at you, but you’ll be laughing all the way to the bank.  I must say I am beginning to take the laughter as a compliment.

I will give you one absolute fact about investing that you can take to the bank with you:

“Eventually, what goes up must come down!”

I have positioned for a “contraction” stage in Oil by purchasing the Jan 130 put options (SYM: QSOMZ), on the United States Oil Fund (SYM: USO).

I have also moved on the Pro Shares Ultra Short Oil and Gas ETF (SYM: DUG).  I believe we can ride oil down to at least $100 a barrel over the next 4-6 months.  Below is a yearly chart of DUG.

(I understand the chart is a little hard to make out, sorry fro any inconvenience.)  If you look closely towards the end of May, up days received a heavy increase in volume over down days. Institutional investors are starting to hedge against falling oil prices.


When it comes to oil, all true prices should be based on demand, inventories, and outlook on future demand.  It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to understand that demand is heading down and will increasingly dwindle in the face of alternative energy sources.  For me the writing is on the wall that it is time to become bearish on oil.

-- John Micheline



Rate this article
Thank you for your vote!

16 Comments

Post your own comment
  1. Dallas (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    It seems to me to be two years early for the alternative energy factors to kick in. OPEC has vowed to break Alt energy, but in reality has no control over it. Based on historical price data from the 1800's, when whale oil ran out, expect another bull run on oil into the $200-400 level before dying. Chrysler's new ev cars get 50 miles to the gallon coming out in 2010. To maintain the same ratio 50/25 mpg avg OPEC has to double the price to maintain same income stream. Therefore $300 bbl. oil. That is my take on it.

    Thanks.....
  2. Jimmy (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    I think the only way we will get rid of the Iran problem is the website that I forgot the name that says we have to be completely free of foreign oil in 10 years, completely. We are wasting the countries money and sending it to evil countries that have extremist brainwashed views of religion and that is the most dangerous thing on earth right now.



    We must put this plan into action, I for one, will have a solar panel roof in the next 10 years, and will explore possible geothermal heating , as one of my neighbors has it. I will do my part I hope everyone else does too. I will also buy an electric plug in car like a Chevy Volt if I have to, anything to get rid of Foreign Oil !!!! Please do your part, we must .



    I just remembered the website it's called wecansolveit.org I hope that's right I haven't double checked it before I got here.
  3. jester112358 (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    You forgot to mention the most important aspect to oil futures pricing: the high probability of Israel taking out (bombing) the Iranian nuke facilities prior to our election in Nov. Factor in the the amount of oil available to the free world with the gulf of Hormuz shut down and you'll actually understand the reason oil spiked to $147 (on comments by Olmert of Israel) and then momentarily relaxed to a more normal $120 value (the current contract price). There was a $25 "war premium" on futures. But nothing has changed politically with Iran, has it? Failure to understand the causal factors, especially political, underlying the charts can be a major mistake.



    Sell your PUTs well before Oct. They will be worthless by Nov-Dec. If you take out Iranian oil exports the world will be short 3-4 million/barrels/day and gas rationing will be the norm.
  4. Robert (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    I like your analysis John (M)! I agree with you in the near term on the direction of oil.

    One detail that does jump at me is that the MACD divergence first seen back in Nov-Jan, was at about 60% of the final top. This in spite of the fact that you even see a first and second sell signal.

    If you correlate to a line chart of the BPI, you also find that important drops in the BPI lead to only small declines in the oil (and related ETF's) trading values.

    Actually I'm still kicking myself for selling out of the puts I bought on oil and oil service ETFs when the BPI hit 88 or 89 in May! I took only a small portion of the profit.... but, I'm learning.

    I would like to hear a comment from Teeka and Chris about your analysis, because there is no doubt about what the short term signals are showing, but: is the long term bull market that Teeka talks about for oil really over?

    Big question mark!

    Thanks for a good article!

    Robert
  5. John (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Very good analysis. Now what about oil services? With the US opening up off-shore drilling, will there still be a demand for their services?
  6. John M (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    First: Steven, I made the charts on StockCharts.com, I then added the graphics on my own.



    Second: Thanks Dylan, Ethan!



    I enjoy both of your articles every week, so I really respect positive feedback from you guys.
  7. Ethan R (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    I agree with Dylan, excellent article, John. You make a strong case for the bears. I do, however, have one question:



    How come when we at Tycoon write articles, your responses always (gently) chide us about not mentioning the fiat currency, and about all of us being slaves to the FED and all that, yet when you write an article like this, there is no mention of all of that? Did all that go away? Hahahaha! Keep up the good work.

    EthanR
  8. Steven (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    To John Micheline:



    Where did you get the chart on oil prices and the volumes traded? At first I thought maybe Big Charts, but did not see any there.



    I thought that your technical analysis was good. You must be a student of Chris Rowe! Technical analysis gives us a true picture of what the makets are really doing. But whether this is an intermediate or long term trend, it remains to be seen.



    Is world oil demand going to continue to grow significantly and is the world's oil supply diminishing and becoming more costly to replace? That is what the oil industry wants us to believe! What is the price that will drive the replacement of oil? If oil is displaced, how long will that take to happen?



    Your thinking seems to be that the US and Europe still is and will remain the engines that drive the world's economy. My fear is that because of poor leadership in this country the US is rapidly being displaced from that position. It seems that the potential populations and markets in South America and Asia are huge! Can their markets take over the leadership? A lot has been said lately of BRIC. Two countries with a lot of resources and two with huge potential markets. If Inia and China exploit their domestic markets like the US did in the early and mid 20th century, I believe we will see the shift. With China I would guess it depends if the leadership thinks that policy will propel them to a position as the world's dominate power.
  9. Peter (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    When looking at the price of oil to decline, isn't it a wise idea to also look at the salary and bonus packages that the oil companies have for their top executives. The boards of directors of large oil companies will soon be raising the salaries and bonuses of their executives because if they don't do it now, they might not get the chance to do it when the price of oil is lower. My take is that the companies with the most highest paid executives, such as Exxon-Mobile (XOM), will give very large bonuses to their executives because of their recent record profits in the last quarter earnings. Their Board of Directors will give themselves and the top executives both raises and bonuses as a reward for the good performance. This is the American way. It is also the way of the Republican Party, which passes tax laws to benefit big business and the very wealthy and not the middle income wage earner. One thing for sure that we can count on, and that is, if the Republican Party has a President in the White House and Congress is almost evenly matched between Republicans and Democrats, the U.S. stock market will continue to go down for at least two years and possibly three years. The fixes that are being made now to the financial markets are just temporary fixes. The financial meltdown in the U.S. is in the early stage of collapse, with many more fixes to come from many different agencies in the Federal Government. There will be mandated fixes by the Treasury Department that will affect all businesses, and increase the Federal taxes paid by large corporations. It is very clear that Congress is aware that the middle income wage earner is paying higher taxes than corporations, while the Boards of Directors give the executives large raises while either not raising the wages of their employees, eliminating jobs by attrition or layoffs, outsourcing jobs and hiring workers from other countries who don't have to pay U.S. taxes. This loophole for large corporations to pay less taxes will be stopped, and Congress knows that it has to be stopped. They just arnn't pushing it in an election year. Next year will be the year of big change, no matter what party has a President in office or what party is the dominating influence in Congress.

    We, the little guy, not the large corporation, will have a chance to make a lot of money in the stock market next year as we learn what the affects of tax and policy changes will have on particular stocks. We will need to keep on top of what our government is doing involving taxes, corporate profits and executive incentivews so that we can make educated decisions as to whether we should buy a stock or a call option that we think will go up in value, short a stock that we think will go down in value, or buy a put option on a stock we think will go down in value. The opportunity will be there for money to be made, but as always, use due dilligence when evaluating a stock. Research all stocks that you are considering buying. Set a limit as to how much of a price drop you will take in the stock you are considering buying and do a mental stop loss on the stock, so that you can see the pattern, news and any other influences that there may be on the stock or option before you sell it to cut your losses. There may be a temporary dip in the market that caused a particular stock to drop in value by ten percent. The stock may be on an upward trend but just took a temporary dip because of total market conditions, and the market will recover along with the stock. I wouldn't want to sell a stock under those conditions, I would continue to watch everything that is going on in the stock market and the stock that I am watching. When things look bad, it is time to sell the stock and move on to another stock. There are big changes comming, and we better be ready for an abrupt change in thinking because of the effects of world trade and foreign capital taking away businesses from the U.S. Many companies that we once thought of as being "All American" are owned by companies in foreign countries. The profits earned in the foreign countries by the companies do not go toward paying taxes in the U.S. The companies only pay taxes on the profits that they make in the U.S. Our Congress has allowed this to happen because it is what big business wants, and the Republican Party will do all they can for big business because that is where they get the most donations to their party and to their campaign. It is, in fact, a payoff by our elected officials in Washington for favors, including donations, to give any break for companies to pay less tax in the U.S. Congress will listen to the middle income wage earner, but they are only able to listen to them if the middle income wage earner tells their representives in government what they want. This brings up a point that I found most inspiring. I was in Washington, DC about five years ago, and had the opportunity to talk with Barbara Boxer, my representative in Congress. She came right out and asked me, point blank, what I wanted her to do in Congress. I told her that I wanted to see better medical care for our returning veterans and a new Veterans benefit package so that they can receive money from the government to attend college. I also wrote her over the coming years, and kept abreast of what she was doing on this matter. Well, she listened to me, and did the job for our veterans. She thanked me for telling her what I would like her to do. I am very grateful to have been given the opportunity by Barbara Boxer to have been asked by her what I wanted her to do in Congress. I am a Marine, having served in the Reserves from 1957 to 1962, and I know that those in our armed services need more than what they can do on their own for this country to have a generation that has the education needed for this country to make progress in the world economy. We helped our soldiers who returned from WWII, Korea, and Vietnam. We are helping our soldiers who are fighting in Iraq and Afghanastan, but we took too long of a time to do it. There are too many returning veterans with brain injuries who will not be helped by the college education benefits because they do not have the ability to think or rationalize clearly. They have permanent brain damage and will need to be taken care of by someone else for the rest of their lives. I do get angry when I think of this distrustion of our younger generation by the President of the United States who put this country into a war when the reason for going to war was a lie. He lied to Congress and to the American public. The war was a mistake, and history will show that it was a mistake. The world has paid a very large economic and human price because the President of the United States of America has admitted that he may have acted too fast in going to war in Iraq. He admitted this recently. Too bad he didn't admit it in either 2001 or 2002. The truth is comming out now, and will be comming out more in bits and pieces until he leaves office, and he will be out of office before he could be impeached, and Nancy Pelosi will not do any impeachmet against him. We have a criminal as President and Congress will not do anything about it. What a sad state this country is in. God help the next President, as he will have his hands full. I sure hope the person who is elected is intelligent enough to know what to do to get this country back on track after eight years of a President who made the largest mistake of any President in the history of the United States of America. God help us all, for we will need devine intervention to get us out of the mess this adminstration has left us.
  10. siera (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Investments should NEVER ever be based on wishful thinking and the way that you want or wish things to be. Reality will bite you in the rear end every time. The oil market was due for a correction and this is currently it,but nobody can deny the long term trend for oil is up. Even with alt. energy development with increased govt. subsidies, increased drilling and exploration, and unforseen energy breakthroughs thru research, you are loooking at years down the road before any meaningful difference is made in the supply and demand equation. If, you take in political,economical and demand isssues into consideration then the logical conclusion is that we are screwed and we need to take immediate and drastic actions to correct the dispecible mess that we have avoided for decades by keeping our collective heads buried ever so deeply wherethe sun does't shine. Good Luck to you all!

Add Your Comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed.

Please fill in the missing field(s).

Important: To comment on Tycoon Report articles, you must first log in. If you are a paying customer of Tycoon, you may use the same login and password that you use normally. If you do not yet have a login, please take a moment to register below. It’s free, and you only need to do it once.

Register

(email address and password information will NOT be displayed publicly)

Name *

Email *

Password *

Subscribe to The Tycoon Report
By registering, you agree to our terms of service.

Already a member? Log in!

(you will not be taken away from this page)

Email *

Password *

Remember?

Forgot Password?




Important Notice to all stock spammers, scammers and penny stock pump-and-dumpers: You will get no respect here. Don’t bother submitting fraudulent or misleading information in the guise of an article, because we will remove it. Any piece of content submitted on this site can be removed at the sole discretion of the Tycoon staff.