Digg It |   Del.icio.us |   Printer Friendly |   PDF |   Email

Did Congress Sell Out the U.S. Economy?

Friday, December 12, 2008 | Ethan Roberts

Rating:
Tycoon readers, there is a stink in the air, and it's coming from Washington!

 
      Not exactly the cherry blossoms in bloom...
 
I recently detailed in The Tycoon Report about the various Democratic congressmen who did their best to minimize and block the need for regulation at Fannie Mae (FNM) in 2004. Now this week CNBC reported that Freddie Mac (FRE) gave money and expensive sporting events tickets to several congressmen who were supposed to be overseeing what was going on at Freddie Mac.

Internal Freddie Mac documents, obtained by the Associated Press, show that two members of the House Financial Services Committee, Bob Ney (R-Ohio), and Paul Kanjorski (D-Pa) were given expensive tickets to the first Washington Nationals home game in 2006, right near the dugout, and next to Freddie Mac executive, Hollis McLoughlin and four Freddie Mac in-house lobbyists.




View of Nationals stadium, far above where congressmen sit...

In addition, 11.7 million dollars were paid to 52 outside lobbyists and consultants that same year, including former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who was paid $300,000. According to CNBC, "Gingrich talked and wrote about what he saw as the benefits of the Freddie Mac business model."

Furthermore, Freddie Mac reportedly spent $2 million on a Republican consulting firm called the DCI group to kill a tough regulatory bill sponsored by Chuck Hagel (R-Nebraska), John McCain (R-AZ) and others, before it could reach the floor for a vote. DCI targeted Republicans on Capitol Hill to put pressure on the party not to regulate Freddie Mac.

So much has been written about predatory lenders, crooked appraisers, and irresponsible borrowers who should have known better, and the debate has raged on for many months about who was at fault for the sub-prime mortgage meltdown that has now ravaged our economy.

But the real truth is, the people who should have been watching out for the folks, to quote Bill O'Reilly's favorite phrase, were not only asleep at the wheel, they were seduced with money to turn a blind eye to what was going on. Our elected representatives, the ones that are paid by our hard-earned tax monies, through their inaction, were doing everything possible to ensure that eventually the U.S. financial house of cards would come tumbling down. Remember that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae combined to own or guarantee $5 trillion in mortgages, and that 20% of those loans were sub-prime.


After checking on their campaign contributions, Senators file back into the committee hearings on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac...

Now we have a congressional "hearing" into how it all happened, with finger pointing on all sides. Yeah, that's the fox guarding the hen house all right.  See what good it does.

Senator Chris Dodd (D-Conn) called for the resignation of Rick Wagoner, the CEO of General Motors, this week. Well I say it's time for Chris Dodd (who reportedly received a special low interest rate mortgage from Fannie Mae along with regular campaign contributions, and then sat on the committee to decide whether or not to regulate Fannie) to resign. And if Chris Dodd and the others in Congress who allowed things to get out of hand won't resign, then we the citizens will just have to vote them out when they run for re-election.

By the way, have you seen the chart of the top recipients of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Campaign Contributions between 1989-2008?
 
NAME
Office
Party/State Total
Christopher Dodd S D-CT $165,400
Barack Obama S D-IL $126,349
John Kerry S D-IL $111,000
Robert Bennett S R_UT $107,999
Spencer Bachus H R-AL $65,000
Roy Blunt H R-MO $96,950
 
source:  www.opensecrets.org


Now I realize that politicians of both parties are allowed to receive campaign contributions from large companies, but don't you think they should recuse themselves from sitting on committees where decisions that have a major effect upon those companies are decided?! 


Door sign at the entrance to the Capitol Building...
 
Speaking of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, unfortunately things could be getting worse on the foreclosure front. Congressional efforts to help the so called "innocent  borrower who was snookered by the big bad mortgage company into taking loans they could not afford", are not going well. There is a report out now that says that of those borrowers who were given loan modification programs, after only three months, almost 36 percent had 30-day re-defaults. After six months, the default rate was almost 53% and after eight months the 30-day default rate was 58%! 

Obviously, holding hands and singing "Kumbaya" is not working here. Could it be time for some "Tough Love"? Months ago when I suggested mandatory direct withdrawal of loan payments from high-risk borrowers' bank accounts, some readers took me to task, saying it creates another level of expensive bureaucracy. While that may be true, I think the alternative we are seeing now is worse. 

Lowering interest rates or principal is not enough when it comes to irresponsible borrowers. In my opinion, all high-risk borrowers (those who have defaults more than 60 days) should be mandated to take a financial education course, to learn how to budget, save, and get off the credit card merry-go-round. Don't want to take the course? Then give the keys back to the bank and go find other housing arrangements. If we don't take some drastic action, our permissive, nice guy attitude is going to bankrupt our country and strangle our future economic development!

Come on, Congress.  Get it together!


 
 
Sing "Kumbaya" to this, Congress....



See you next week!


(Please let us know what you think about Ethan Roberts's article.)
Rate his article here »



Ethan Roberts
Contributing Editor
The Tycoon Report


Rate this article
Thank you for your vote!

33 Comments

Post your own comment
  1. Pat (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Larry...you need help!
  2. Pat (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Sad but true...even in Canada it seems stupidity rules over common sense. Where do these idiots come from?
  3. Larry (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Tacky, Tacky, get your head out of the sand!!!!!!

    It was the democrats who started this whole bonanza failure, under the leadership of the Clinton administration. Get real, dude!! And also, if you haven't noticed, ever since he recognized the gays and gave them all these privileges, the morals of this country has been going straight down hill (faster then the current market crisis).
  4. Ron (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Next to you Atilla the Hun was a pussy!!!
  5. Tacky (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    I'm sorry but easing credit requirements to allow people to buy a home is a good thing. Allowing the pracitices that went far beyond "easing" but were totally irresponsible was not. Whatever happened to truth in lending and actually checking out the ability to pay. Even that would not have had the catastrophic results had such mortgages not been packaged into financial instruments and sold as "safe" investments when those companies who were responsible knew they were not and then leveraging these instruments at levels that were imprudent and downright fraudulent. I know of several people working at these companies who quit or were fired because the balked at the practices going on. It did not take much of a brain to realize that when these mortgages reached the five-year point and interest rates escalated, foreclosures would follow. Many of the people who took advantage of the lower rates were not sophisticated enough to realize what would happen and were just happy they could afford a home. Others saw a great way to make money by flipping houses and making money with no money invested. There were plenty of books, seminars, etc. telling them how to do it.

    It is apparent that you want to blame Democrats for the whole thing. Your list of contributors insinuates accusations. Frankly, I am sick of the kind of politics that does nothing to look forward to solutions but must accuse by inuendo and selective presentation of facts. Shame on you.
  6. lazycritic (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Your article is a bit misleading. Corporations may not donate to candidates in federal elections. These donations are probably either from individuals working at Fannie/Freddie, or from PACs.
  7. Pat (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Right on Ethan! Thanks for having the guts to put it in print.
  8. Bill (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    It is my guess that many of the foreclosures are due to the subsequent unemployment of the owners after the purchase. There are huge numbers of people who could and would be current on their mortgages but for the disruption in employment of those persons. One has only to look at the state of service industries, manufacuring, construction, etc. To imply that all of these people are shiftless deadbeats out to game the system is ignorant at best and Pharisaical at worst. "There, but for the grace of God, go I". Think about it.
  9. Larry (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    I don't understand why no one is mentioning the ridiculous "bonuses" these CEO are getting. If the Congress does bail these companies out, I hope that these bonuses are eliminated for the next ten years. I would hate to see a bailout plan approved, and these clowns still getting these bonuses at our expense.
  10. DONNA (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Ethan, once again you are right on target. The people of this country are it's backbone and it's time we took a stand. Here are a few funny things about America: We have a congress that can't run a country, criticizing CEO's who can't run a company. Like the mortgage crises, why didn't they see it coming? And now that bailouts are being offered,everyone & their brother suddenly going to be bankrupt in a month. A friend of mine lost a union job to an immigrant. The Union stewards are making an extra $1.80 an hour for each immigrant hired. ( Yep, that's right!). Back in February I spoke with a wall street retiree who told me that gas would be below $2 by the end of the year. Gee, how did he know?. Yep, sounds to me like we're definitely being sold down the river. Just A question? Will they coming for what's left of our 401k's too? I'm feeling we should grab what's left of it & run for our lives while we still can.

Add Your Comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed.

Please fill in the missing field(s).

Important: To comment on Tycoon Report articles, you must first log in. If you are a paying customer of Tycoon, you may use the same login and password that you use normally. If you do not yet have a login, please take a moment to register below. It’s free, and you only need to do it once.

Register

(email address and password information will NOT be displayed publicly)

Name *

Email *

Password *

Subscribe to The Tycoon Report
By registering, you agree to our terms of service.

Already a member? Log in!

(you will not be taken away from this page)

Email *

Password *

Remember?

Forgot Password?




Important Notice to all stock spammers, scammers and penny stock pump-and-dumpers: You will get no respect here. Don’t bother submitting fraudulent or misleading information in the guise of an article, because we will remove it. Any piece of content submitted on this site can be removed at the sole discretion of the Tycoon staff.