Digg It |   Del.icio.us |   Printer Friendly |   PDF |   Email

How to Rob an Individual Investor

Thursday, July 10, 2008 | Dylan Jovine

Rating:
Editor's Note: Dylan is taking a much deserved vacation. Please enjoy this article, which was originally published almost exactly a year ago.

THE RICH HAVE BEEN DOING IT TO THE POOR SINCE THE BEGINNING OF TIME.

Fortunately for us, it’s a heck of a lot more blatant (and therefore easier to spot) on Wall Street than it is in many places.

Some call it a “hustle”.  Others call it a “con job”.  Whatever your pet name for it is, one thing is certain: if you don’t see it coming, you’ll likely wind up much poorer as a result and very, very sorry you ever ran into it.

On Wall Street, as opposed to Main Street, the con takes a couple of different shapes.  One is the famous and well discussed “bucket-shop hustle”.

Now, many people automatically think of small, dingy firms – akin to a boiler room – when they hear the name “bucket-shop”.  But those firms are responsible for a small fraction of the damage done to individual investors.  To this very day, the most harmful “bucket-shop” practices are engaged in by many of the largest brokerage firms in the world.

It goes a little something like this: you get a call from a well-intentioned broker who has the “deal of a lifetime” for you.  After getting you all worked up into a lather, you’re convinced that it’s something you should purchase.  What you don’t know is that the broker who just convinced you to buy shares of XYZ was secretly selling them for one of the firm's largest customers.  Before you know it, you’re left holding shares of a stock or bond that have decreased in value by as much as 90%.

Although these kinds of shenanigans continue to this very day, the last really blatant example was during the height of the dot com crash in the late 1990s.

The “commission cartwheel” is another variation of the same hustle.  The only thing that changes is that, instead of asking you to buy a stock that somebody else is selling, you’re asked to purchase shares in a stock that gives the salesman an extraordinarily large commission.

What’s particularly damaging about this little hustle is that it comes in forms that most people couldn’t imagine.

Sure, some folks expect to get hustled when buying shares of a stock.  But oftentimes, people practicing the “commission cartwheel” hide their hustle behind otherwise innocent sounding securities such as bonds and mutual funds.  Yikes!

And of course, let’s not forget the traditional classic, the “pump and dump”.  In its older incarnations, investors get called to buy a stock that is secretly being liquidated by the owners of the firms (as opposed to large clients of the firm).

For example, you get a call to own shares of XYZ for $2 per share.  What you don’t know is that the firm calling you had an investment banking relationship with the company and is selling the shares allotted to them at sometimes pennies per share.  So every time you purchase 1,000 shares of stock, you are really making the firm an “investment banking” profit of $1,998 if the bank owns the shares at $0.02 each.

These days, the classic “pump and dump” has taken on a new and much hipper flavor with the use of email.  This new and improved “electronic pump and dump” does largely the same thing, but via email instead of phone calls.

I can’t tell you how many friends of mine – largely smart and successful people – shoot me the occasional email asking my opinion on a stock they’ve just been given the greatest tip about.

I don’t even respond any longer if the symbol ends in the letters “.PK” denoting a pink sheet security.  If they don’t know to beware of those types of advertisements at this point (after years and years of my warnings), then nothing I can say will change that.

Last but not least, there is another classic Wall Street hustle that I’ve failed to mention so far.  Of all the hustles I’ve discussed, it is by far the sleekest and smoothest.  In fact, it’s such a smooth and silky hustle that it isn’t even illegal!  But make no mistake about it – it’s just as dangerous (if not more so) than the rest of them.

We’ll refer to it as the “IPO – Icicle” and it goes a little something like this:

When a specific industry group has a great run – say 5 or 10 years of excellent business conditions – the founders plan to sell their stock at the very top of the market.

For example, right now – for the first time in history – private equity firms of all stripes are planning to go public.  This is largely a result of the success (or the illusion thereof) of Blackstone’s recent IPO.

Why on earth would these otherwise greedy private equity mavens want to suddenly sell shares to the investing public?  Is it that they’ve grown a conscience and want small investors across America to make some great money owning their shares?

Of course not!

What they’re saying to themselves is that we’re at the top of a bubble in private equity.  With low interest rates, a business-friendly administration and a low tax environment, things are simply never going to get this good ever again.

So they’re cashing out now.  Right at the peak of the private equity bubble, when small investors who don’t understand the cyclical nature of things are at their most fascinated by the billions of dollars they’re making.

This is by far the most dangerous of all hustles because it comes gift-wrapped by some of the biggest names in business whom you read about each day in The Wall Street Journal (Steve Schwarzman from Blackstone, Henry Kravis from KKR) and seems perfectly legitimate.  And on the surface, it is; it’s not like they’ve planned a criminal enterprise with you as the victim.

But that’s just what makes it so darn dangerous.  They know that you’re buying their stock from them at the top of a bubble.  And yes, they’re definitely taking advantage of that.  But that’s really what Wall Street is all about, isn’t it: smart investors taking advantage of less informed investors?

So consider this as fulfilling my job to inform you.  Indeed, folks, trust me on this: you want to avoid these private equity firms like the plague right now.

I’m not saying they're not fundamentally good businesses.

What I’m saying is that buying shares in these companies now would be like buying into the Florida real estate market a year or so ago: a bad idea, by any stretch of the imagination.

For those of you sitting around right now in the middle of summer looking for things to buy, beware.

Mark my words when I say the private equity firms aren’t the profit pond you want to be fishing in.

(Please let us know what you think about Dylan Jovine's article.)
Rate his article here »



Dylan Jovine
Contributing Editor
The Tycoon Report




Rate this article
Thank you for your vote!

11 Comments

Post your own comment
  1. Tom (8 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    As to your example of a firm owning shares at $0.02 each, their profit would be $1980, not $1998.
  2. dieter (8 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    I#m full with you. The world of exchanges and brokers, anaylist aso are all conmen.

    I do hope y got my sense, cause my english is very bad.
  3. Florentina (8 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Very good article. Thank you for sharing your knowledge and experience with us for free. Very good critical thinking. Hope to be able to read more from you. Pls don't take the comments below (from other people) personally, just ignorant people who think they know everything. They will probably learn from their own mistakes later.
  4. Stevie88 (8 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Poorly informative article. Factually you have no LBO firms coming to market with an IPO. Factually the IPO market is for the foreseeable future moribund. KKR while continuing to have its paperwork filed with the SEC has no immediate plans to take part of the firm public, and if any given firm were going to attempt such a thing, it would be KKR.
  5. shawn (8 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    dylan i have been trying my level best to get folks to take notice of this sort of thing.

    i dont know if you have read this but i would like to share it with you and your readers.

    http://www.deepcapture.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/deepcapture-the-story-v1.pdf



    thank you for your article
  6. KLong (8 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Not a lot to say. Just a good article. I dont care if it says .pk or otcbb, its all the same. You had better know what your doing with it, some of these stocks are good, some arent. Many, not the ones they pump on the internet, are good for trading provided you run a stop loss. On the other hand some might be good for investing.



    There are scams everywhere. Some are worse than others. Everyone has an agenda. I dont care how noble or honerable they act, everyone wants something.
  7. ashwin (8 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Neal R Bruckman,it's nice you disagree and correcting about pink s.and buckett shop not every body knows about it. instead being harsh it will be nice if you contribute your knowlge to people?
  8. Ralph (8 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    The Tycoon staff make it impossible to contact

    anybody that's 98.2. I've done everything I

    had instructions about and looking forward to a

    way to hear any part of the Pyramid trade, Webinar

    I'd enjoy some communication with anybody including e-mails. Ralph Lowry randrlowry|cox.net
  9. Alexander H (8 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Mark, I would say this is not discussed because you are losing buying power with this strategy. If you consider the real rate of inflation and not the cooked numbers from Washington, you lose.



    Sure, this is far better than being invested in the wrong places and losing even more. However, I would assume that the writers of this site would not consider this a strategy worth recommending since there is always a bull market somewhere.



    Just my two cents...



    Maybe one of the authors here is going to answer that question?
  10. Mark (8 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    I don't hear a lot on this site about what I did. Almost a year ago I saw a lot of things going on globally that made me anxious. The wars, trade deficit, housing meltdown, finanacial institutions ripping people off or going broke. Since I don't have the money to day trade, I put all of my company 401K money in fixed income. I may have only made 4 to 5% (not including company matching contributions equalling 8% of anual income) but at least for the last year, while all the major indices have lost 15 to 20%, I have not lost a dime of my monthly contributions or any of what was already in my 401K. I am waiting for better times to get back into the market but I don't see that happening any time soon. Why does Tycoon report not discuss this as an option for us older folks who want to keep our money safe in unstable times?

Add Your Comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed.

Please fill in the missing field(s).

Important: To comment on Tycoon Report articles, you must first log in. If you are a paying customer of Tycoon, you may use the same login and password that you use normally. If you do not yet have a login, please take a moment to register below. It’s free, and you only need to do it once.

Register

(email address and password information will NOT be displayed publicly)

Name *

Email *

Password *

Subscribe to The Tycoon Report
By registering, you agree to our terms of service.

Already a member? Log in!

(you will not be taken away from this page)

Email *

Password *

Remember?

Forgot Password?




Important Notice to all stock spammers, scammers and penny stock pump-and-dumpers: You will get no respect here. Don’t bother submitting fraudulent or misleading information in the guise of an article, because we will remove it. Any piece of content submitted on this site can be removed at the sole discretion of the Tycoon staff.