Digg It |   Del.icio.us |   Printer Friendly |   PDF |   Email

InBev Goes Another Round With BUD

Tuesday, July 8, 2008 | Wall Street Strategies (laurac) Is this Spam?

Rating:

Down goes Stokes, down goes Stokes... It doesn't have quite the same ring to it that Howard Cosell's "Down goes Frazier" line referring to the 1973 World Heavyweight Championship. However, it is what InBev is trying to do the Board of Directors for Anheuser-Busch (ticker: BUD) in an effort to move along its $44.2 billion (65 per share) offer for St. Louis brewer.

On July 7, InBev announced that it intends to file a preliminary consent solicitation statement with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission to remove the board of Anheuser-Busch (AB) and give AB's shareholders a chance to vote on the potential takeover. InBev said that this move will provide AB shareholders with an opportunity to have a direct voice in the proposed combination of the two companies. InBev is proposing that Marjorie Bowen, Adolphus Busch, G. Peter D'Aloia, Ronald Dollens, James Healey, John Lilly, Allan Loren, Ernest Mario, Henry McKinnell, Paul Meister, William Vinson, Lawrence Keith Wimbush and Larry Yost will replace the current board of Anheuser-Busch directors.

The first round of punches has been thrown, with InBev's $44.2 billion ($65 per share) offer. AB's counter was to reject the offer saying it was not high enough, which left the door open for a higher price. As we stated previously, CEO August Busch IV and AB would not go down without a fight, but it seems that the Board is now trying to maneuver for a higher price. On Monday afternoon, AB's rebuttal was the following: "InBev's announced attempt to seek to replace Anheuser-Busch's existing board of directors with InBev's hand-picked nominees is a self-serving effort by InBev to try to purchase Anheuser-Busch for a price Anheuser-Busch's independent board already has determined to be financially inadequate and not in the best interest of shareholders..."

On June 11, after the news broke about the potential offer from InBev, we indicated that InBev would likely have to resort to a hostile takeover and all indications suggest that is where the transaction is heading now. While this back and forth isn't quite as riveting as the Joe Frazier and George Foreman battle royale from Jamaica in 1973, it does hold a national icon in limbo.

Written by David Silver, a Research Analyst for Wall Street Strategies (www.wstreet.com) covering companies in the Transports, Autos, and Beverage sectors.



Rate this article
Thank you for your vote!

Add Your Comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed.

Please fill in the missing field(s).

Important: To comment on Tycoon Report articles, you must first log in. If you are a paying customer of Tycoon, you may use the same login and password that you use normally. If you do not yet have a login, please take a moment to register below. It’s free, and you only need to do it once.

Register

(email address and password information will NOT be displayed publicly)

Name *

Email *

Password *

Subscribe to The Tycoon Report
By registering, you agree to our terms of service.

Already a member? Log in!

(you will not be taken away from this page)

Email *

Password *

Remember?

Forgot Password?




Important Notice to all stock spammers, scammers and penny stock pump-and-dumpers: You will get no respect here. Don’t bother submitting fraudulent or misleading information in the guise of an article, because we will remove it. Any piece of content submitted on this site can be removed at the sole discretion of the Tycoon staff.