Digg It |   Del.icio.us |   Printer Friendly |   PDF |   Email

Has Uncle Sam Put Closure To The Foreclosure?

Friday, August 8, 2008 | Ethan Roberts

Rating:
Alan Greenspan gave an interview on CNBC last week, in which he said the housing market is "nowhere near the bottom of the home price thing", and the US is "right on the brink" of a recession.

OUCH!  That's a 1-2 punch, and the market sold off 200 points in the final hour after Greenspan's speech.  Even his assurance that the U.S. is in remarkably good shape, given the financial system problems in the past year, failed to assuage the bear market's fervor for a sell off.

I remember how my father, an avid CNBC watcher for years before he passed away last year, would often plead with the TV, "Why can't that blankety blank Greenspan just shut up?!  Every time he opens his mouth, the market tanks!"



Greenspan added that the bottom of the housing market is the "critical statistic" in creating a balanced economy, and that "Until then, I hope we can get a sufficiently stable stock price because there is the fundamental source of capital  from which we get the ability to re-capitalize a goodly part of the financial system which surely needs it." 

Translation:  Real estate prices and the stock market are currently enmeshed.  Greenspan was echoing the words of the frequently maligned James Cramer, who predicted last autumn that the stock market will not stabilize until the real estate market does. 

Now this week, pouring gasoline on the fire, Oppenheimer analyst Meredith Whitney told CNBC that in her view, homes could fall another 30% in value before it is all over!  That means that if the  home for which you paid $350,000 is now worth $400,000, and if Meredith Whitney is right, your home will soon be worth $280,000.  Makes you want to scream, doesn't it?



Edvard Munch's 19th century expressionistic portrayal of the latest Meredith Whitney prediction.  Amazing how he knew it would happen...

I recently wrote an article for Tycoon, "Would You Journey 300 miles To Buy Investment Real Estate", in which I detailed a foreclosure purchase that I made on the Southwest Gulf Coast of Florida.  This past week I traveled back to that area to do some minor rehab work on the home, getting it ready to be rented.

When I asked a Realtor what was selling in her local area, she simply crowed, "FORECLOSURES!"

She added that regularly priced homes were still sitting unsold for many months.  Both investors and owner occupants alike are taking advantage of the lower priced bargains that are pervasive, and who can blame them?  Lower mortgage payments, greater return on investment, and protecting oneself with equity from continued decline, are all valid reasons to buy distressed property.  Many of the foreclosures are just as pristine as their more expensive counterparts.

In fact, while I was there, I bid on another foreclosure, and although my offer was fairly strong, another offer was superior to mine, and so I lost the bid.  Competition for a bargain is heating up.

In my own area of Northeast Florida, we now have 610 foreclosures listed for sale on our local Multiple Listing Service (MLS).  At the height of the seller's market in 2006, there were perhaps 35 or 40 foreclosures at any given time.  So we have vacillated from one extreme to another.  An additional 1725 short sales continue to clog inventory levels here.  After five consecutive months of slightly increasing closed sales on single family homes, the July closed sales are down 19% from June, and over 30% from July, 2007.  The condo closed sales figures are almost identical.  Although there are recent reports of improving sales in other areas of the U.S., these numbers do not bode well for my local Real Estate market in the second half of the year.

UNCLE SAM TO THE RESCUE?!

The American Housing Rescue and Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008 (H.R. 3221), which President Bush signed into law last week may help the real estate markets, but it will take some time to really make an impact.  The bill provides a $300 billion plan for helping some 400,000 homeowners to pay off sub prime mortgages, and replace them with more affordable FHA loans.  But the catch is that the lender must agree to reduce the principal of each loan to 90% of the current appraised value in order to refinance them, and the borrower must agree to share 50% of all future appreciation with FHA!

As prices continue to decline in many areas, it becomes increasingly more expensive for the lenders to reduce enough principal to make the loans sufficient.  The congressional budget office has estimated that as many as 35% of the refinanced loans could end up in default again.  That means Tommy and Tammy Taxpayer could be picking up the tax tab twice.  Now there's a tongue twister!

You may have heard that another feature of this bill is to provide a tax refund to first-time home buyers, worth up to 10% of a home's purchase price, but with a cap of $7,500.  Sounds like a great deal for first time home buyers, right?  What you may not have heard however, is that this tax refund is really an interest free loan that has to be paid back to the IRS in $500 installments over 15 years.  Uncle Sam has become like one of those automobile dealers, where the ads make the deal sounds fantastic, until you read the fine print!

     

There's nothing fine about fine print...

Another important aspect of the bill is that the U.S. treasury will offer Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac an unlimited line of credit over the next 18 months, and can even buy stock in those companies. 

Finally, the bill provides communities with $4 billion to buy and revitalize foreclosed properties.  President Bush had opposed this measure, because he felt that all it did was help the lenders, but ended his opposition to it when faced with political pressure.  It was argued that it would help to remove deserted and blighted homes from neighborhoods, stabilizing nearby values as a result.  In addition, it will provide jobs to thousands of contractors and their crews.

It remains to be seen what the states will do with these homes once they are purchased and rehabilitated.  One possibility would be to provide families, currently on long waiting lists, with rental homes, under the HUD Section 8 program.  Another option is to provide homes to persons who have lost their homes due to hurricanes and other natural disasters.

Hey, maybe they should just give these homes to people who have lost their own home to foreclosure!

(JUST KIDDING!!!  No hate mail, please)

                   

Applicants await Section 8 vouchers   Katrina victims cope with floods


Reviewing the Tycoon member comments over the last couple of months, I am struck by the dichotomy of opinions expressed about the Real Estate market, foreclosures, sub prime mess, etc.  Many of you have passionately expressed anger and frustration over the bailouts of lenders and home owners alike, saying the free market must be allowed to find its own bottom, while others have stated your case that we need to help home owners who were victimized, and stabilize the markets to avoid further damage. 

Someday we may all look back at 2008 as a crazy, chaotic period, in which our American society was confronted with serious issues of self-reliance, responsibility, the proper role of government, and perhaps even Machiavellian attitudes toward the financial system as a totality. 

In the meantime, there remains no closure yet to the ongoing foreclosure problem, and I am wondering how many more of them we will see as job layoffs continue.  Most of the foreclosures within the past two years have been from sub prime loans, but as the economy struggles, even those with conventional fixed rate loans who have lost their jobs and can't sell their homes, could be at risk for default.  Refinancing will not be an option for those with no jobs.

As always, there is money to be made from calamity, whether from the purchase of a home that sells for 40% less than it did two years ago, or from shorting the weakest Real Estate or financial stocks, or from buying ETF's that short these sectors, such as SRS or SKF.

However, in the long term, what is best for the country is to get closure on the foreclosure mess, before it drags us into a 1929 style depression.  Although like everyone else, I am not happy to be the Tommy Taxpayer who has to pick up the tab for this mess, I sincerely hope that the new government housing bill will provide some much needed stimulus for the end of the housing debacle. 

Tycoon Readers, have any better ideas on what to do?  Send them in!





See you next week!








(Please let us know what you think about Ethan Roberts's article.)
Rate his article here »



Ethan Roberts
Contributing Editor
The Tycoon Report




Rate this article
Thank you for your vote!

14 Comments

Post your own comment
  1. Durward (21 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    No financial writer ever mentions that all these bailouts and stimulus packages, as well as the "War" are paid for without any taxes being raised to cover the debt. In other words the government is just printing money.This is wiping out the life savings of those of us who are retired. The dollar "surged" this week to $1.50/Euro! The Euro entered the financial world at 1.19 Euro/dollar. you figure it out. Quite a "surge"!
  2. Florentina (21 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Maybe trying to improve our economy by producing more and creating more jobs instead of creating jobs for China. Nowadays everything is made in China. This is why their economy is developing while ours is dying...
  3. DONNA (21 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Great article Ethan, but I can't help but wonder why the Government sat around and did nothing to circumvent this, waiting only until the last minute to "find solutions". We now live in a new society that is grooming people to think they will be "bailed out" of all of their stupid decisions.



    No one is going to convince me that millions of home buyers had 'absolutely no clue' what they were signing. Sorry. Yeah, there were some crazy ideas for loans going around, but they were still pretty simple to understand. Also, did they just decide to buy a house with absolutely no planning or thought whatsoever? And were they in a catatonic state while the loan officer was 'explaining' it to them. Did they do any research at all before they signed the papers? Come on ! Freddie & Fannie not making money now ? Gee,too bad, they approved those loans.



    Real Estate agents are crying because their paychecks are going down. Did they save any of that money or did they think it was never going to end. We live in a clueless society today.



    This is a market people !



    Simple fix to the whole thing: Let 'em foreclose.



    There are plenty of people just hanging around waiting to snap up these houses. Only thing is we're not going to pay the price the banks want for them. Drop the 30% and see what happens. Buyers will be coming out of the woodwork. In the meantime they're looking to 'save' these people & use taxpayer dollars to do it. In the end the government makes a profit | taxpayers expense.



    Does this make sense? Or was it the plan all along?
  4. VINCE (21 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Zimbabwa recently removed ten zeros from it's Billion Dollar Bill in order to turn it into a One Dollar Bill. May be we can borrow those ten zeros and add them onto Our Dollar. !!!!
  5. jester112358 (21 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Banks, including all lien holders such as fanny (phoney) and freddy (fraudey) should simply quickly foreclose on all properties more than 120 days delinquent on payments, then contract with property management firms to rent out the collateral property they now own-perhaps to those they have foreclosed on if they make their payments. The banks will then be able to recapitalize via rental income instead of interest payments while having real assets on their books to balance all their bad liabilities.



    Viola, no more toxic balance sheets! Some banking regulations may need altering, however. Banks now suffer only the likely future property depreciation of ~20-30% which is much smaller than they would suffer via shorts sales (typical loss of 50%). In the meantime, lower housing prices will eventually bring new buyers into the market who, based upon real income and savings can make the new 20% down payment requirements on these seized properties, thus preventing a repeat of this fiasco. And everyone will have learned a great lesson about too much leverage without yet more transfer of capital from the private to the public sector via taxpayer bailouts.
  6. Michael O (21 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Ethan,



    There are some aspects of this credit crunch that I just don't understand.



    Where were the private industry auditors (inhouse type people screaming at what the CEOs were doing by leveraging these companies to extremely dangerous levels? These numbers should have shown up, even if buried, in company financial reports. Yes?



    Where were bank and financial industry state or federal agencies with oversight and compliance people?



    Considering the effect of the economic damage that has been done to the USA and the world at large, where are the media reports about ongoing criminal investigations, trials and convictions followed by lawsuits for the perpetrators of these schemes? Their actions were criminal for their lack of "Due Diligence" They'd fire a employee broker for non-compliance but reward a CEO with a Golden Parachute retirement to their country club life style.



    This credit crunch, if it had been orchestrated by an easily identifable foreign country would have been labled as economic terrorism, but the enemy is us. It was an inside job!



    Consider that the Fed decided to abandon the US dollar with a flood of dollars into the world economy devaluing our currency and shooting the price of crude and other commodities to US consumers into the stratosphere. I've heard the number given between 500 and 700 BILLIION dollars of US wealth being transfered to foreign countries on an annual basis to satisfy our need for energy and other products. Unprecedented. Scary. Those dollars will now be used to finance the purchase of US assets that we probably won't want to have transfered to foreign hands. What is the agenda of foreign entities who will now own important pieces of the US? What will their lobbists pay our Senators to vote for? Will our Senators take foreign lobbist money against the national interests of US citizens?



    The little guy eats the consequences of the actions of people too rich and important to prosecute. It's disgusting, and so is our politicans lack of leadership and wisdom. They can't even design a healthy energy policy for this country. What do we have? T. Boon Pickens (private citizen) running adds on the TV trying to get something going! Nancy Pelosi, where are you?
  7. Ethan R (21 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Dale and Mark, I agree with you both 100%.
  8. Dale (21 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    I’m not wishing for a depression or recession because of the housing crisis, but somewhere along the line people have to be responsible and have integrity for their own debt and the one’s cheating people need to be punished. I’m outrage that the taxpayers are having to bailout financial institutions while the CEOs/directors are paid millions in annual salaries (e.g. the directors for Fannie and Freddie). I’m not against anyone making 14.5 million dollars a year. They could work for Exxon Mobile or start their own company. If the government is going to bailout incompetent companies, the CEOs/directors should have their salaries reduced to a minimum (at least) of less than the President of the United States. Maybe that would ease taxpayer burden and get the economy turning again. We need to get control over our debt in this county or maybe some other country will in the next financial crisis.
  9. bradeddins (21 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    The money changers behind the real estate bubble will just keep reloaning and having us pick up the tab. Fixes are not going to take the money machine away from them. We need to understand what really happened:

    http://www.solari.com/blog/?p=1390#more-1390



    The economic situation
  10. John M (21 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Good Morning Ethan,



    Ethan Wrote:

    Now this week, pouring gasoline on the fire, Oppenheimer analyst Meredith Whitney told CNBC that in her view, homes could fall another 30% in value before it is all over! That means that if the home for which you paid $350,000 is now worth $400,000, and if Meredith Whitney is right, your home will soon be worth $280,000. Makes you want to scream, doesn't it?



    John replies:



    Legal Tender Notes are not money. LTN are receipts of debt used as currency. It has no value. It has less than zero value in a declining economy with high unemployment. LTN are nothing more than accountancy; as in the board game Monopoly.



    Purchasing power of LTN is what makes it valuable. Inflated LTN is ever more worthless as it is debased by inflation. Making big numbers of LTN in trade is stupid. Purchasing power is what counts. When LTN are debased by inflation and the market corrects by deflation, the purchasing value is still relatively the same. As Einstein discovered, "It's all relative". LOL



    Hurtful things come in several ways to tribute slaves. 1)Value is perceived in relation to time. And, the IRS taxes income at the time of trade. 2) Plurality of LTN being taxed on a percent basis seems to hurt more than when LTN are more plural. 3)Whether LTN are plural and inflated or less plural and deflated, the Central Bank steadily takes in interest (Usury) on the LTN it loans as long as those loans are in force. This is the classical definition of slavery.



    When the useful idiots realize this LTN will fall to ruin, as has every fiat currency historically; fiat currency will be seen as Continentals were at the founding of America. How long the Central Bankster's game can be played depends on how "dumbed down" the tribute slaves are presently and how willing they are to take honest assessment of themselves for the betterment of future generations of sovereign citizens.



    Gold backed notes equals citizen sovereignty.



    Debt backed LTN equals citizen slavery.





    John Mahler

Add Your Comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed.

Please fill in the missing field(s).

Important: To comment on Tycoon Report articles, you must first log in. If you are a paying customer of Tycoon, you may use the same login and password that you use normally. If you do not yet have a login, please take a moment to register below. It’s free, and you only need to do it once.

Register

(email address and password information will NOT be displayed publicly)

Name *

Email *

Password *

Subscribe to The Tycoon Report
By registering, you agree to our terms of service.

Already a member? Log in!

(you will not be taken away from this page)

Email *

Password *

Remember?

Forgot Password?




Important Notice to all stock spammers, scammers and penny stock pump-and-dumpers: You will get no respect here. Don’t bother submitting fraudulent or misleading information in the guise of an article, because we will remove it. Any piece of content submitted on this site can be removed at the sole discretion of the Tycoon staff.