Digg It |   Del.icio.us |   Printer Friendly |   PDF |   Email

3 investing lessons you "must" pass to your children

Thursday, June 26, 2008 | Dylan Jovine

Rating:
MY WIFE IS PREGNANT WITH OUR VERY FIRST CHILD...

And for the first time in my life I've found myself wondering what investing lessons I'd like to pass down to my child.

After giving it much thought, I've decided to recommend the following three books as a starting point:

1. Competitive Strategy: To learn how to study a business, I'd suggest he/she start by reading "Competitive Strategy" by Michael Porter. This is by far the best book ever written on how to determine the competitive position of a business.

2. Buffett's Annual Letters: Next, I'd recommend he/she read Warren Buffett's annual shareholder letters dating back to 1977 (www.berkshirehathaway.com) to learn how to value a business. Even today, most people don't realize just how lucky we are to have a giant such as Buffett openly share his thoughts with us.

3. Reminiscences of a Stock Operator: And finally, I'd suggest the classic "Reminiscences of a Stock Operator" by Edwin Lefevre to learn how to study the market.

Although the readings above are just a starting point, I think inside each you can discover links to other branches of knowledge in the investing tree.

But becoming a great investor isn't just about reading some books or making some money. It's an evolution; one that takes place over a long period of time.

The Evolution of an Investor


The evolution of a professional investor is a curious thing.

At a young age, most investors are still captive to their "institutional" programming. Thus, the ideas they have are based largely on what they've been told by their parents or taught in school. Facts are used to fit their preconceived notions of the world and the stock market.

Investors who operate at this level are still operating "within the box." All market moves are seen through a narrow lens.

But a good investor will begin to tear down conventional wisdom one experience at a time. He learns quickly that the market doesn't suffer fools gladly. If you don't have a healthy respect for the facts, the market will take your money from you, no questions asked.

At some point in his/her career – after gaining a certain amount of knowledge and experience – an investor begins to "see" things differently.

Instead of reacting to what the market does or what the headlines proclaim, you begin to act independently of them. At this stage of the game you have learned to trust your analysis of the facts to guide your decision making.

It's at this point that you realize cold-bloodedly that there actually is a "box", and 99% of all market participants operate within it. Personally, that's when I first looked in the mirror with pride and was able to call myself a professional investor.

But as you will see very soon, I was a bit early ...

To the Man with the Hammer, Everything Looks Like a Nail

Several years ago I made what was, at that point of my life, a large investment of time and money into an internet start-up. Looking back now, it's almost laughable – but at the tail end of the 1990's I thought the company was actually onto something.

The fact that most of America joined me in my folly was of no comfort to me. Not only did I have a great reputation as an investor, but I had earned a reputation as a savvy businessman when I sold my brokerage firm at the ripe age of 28. In my circle of friends, I'm known as the "wise skeptic".

I, of all people, should have known better.

That's why it didn't bother me to lose my money. From a very early age, the market trained me to study my losses objectively and move on to the next opportunity. I never carry losses with me for too long. Far worse was the humiliation I felt. How could I have done something so darn stupid, I asked myself repeatedly.

I remember one of my friends trying to console me one day over drinks. He said that it wasn't my fault. I had the "right idea at the wrong time".

But any businessperson worth his weight knows that's nonsense! Half the job of having a good idea is knowing when.

Mistakes Made ...

It took me almost a full year of anger and depression before I was even able to look at my actions properly. Believe me when I tell you I almost couldn't do it. To look at my actions objectively would require brutal honesty, which is hard to come by even on the best of days. But I knew that my primary goal in life was not to protect my ego – it was to become a great investor. And to continue on that road I had to be brutally honest with myself.

That brings me back to the second part of my answer.

It was this single experience that led to my understanding of the "intangibles" needed to continue on my road to become a great investor. While every great investor has gone through a watershed moment like this, I don't think it's possible to learn from their mistakes. Intellectually, I had read all the case studies and studied all the greats; but you don't "know it" until you experience it and recover from it.

I often meet older businesspeople who experience this moment of failure much later in their lives. In some ways I feel sorry for them. It's much harder on the ego, and, consequently much harder to recover, after you've had decades of success.

And certainly it doesn't help having the financial responsibility that comes with an established family. Fortunately for me, I was hindered by neither. But still, my path was extremely difficult.

Here's what I learned:

I first realized that my ego had gotten the better of me. Flushed with business success early in life, it simply never occurred to me that I could be wrong. Perhaps even worse was that my oversized ego led me to dismiss lessons learned as an investor: instead of taking my loss early, the company continued to wander around as a corporate zombie, half dead and half alive.

Since I was allocating capital personally, the buck stopped on my desk.

My inflated ego led me to myriad other problems that affected my decision making. However, due to the importance of each issue, each problem is worth noting on its own.

Secondly, I realized that I suffered from a tremendous lack of knowledge of both the markets and the industry I was operating in. My ignorance of both magnified the problems greatly.

With regard to the market, I should have realized that everything that was happening – cheap money, a booming stock market, the "new, new" thing – had happened before.

One need look no further than the 1960's boom in transistors, or the 19th century boom in railroad stocks to see it.

I actually remember picking up a copy of Ben Graham's "Intelligent Investor," written in 1934, and almost vomiting as he confessed to making the same mistakes earlier. The fact that he scolded himself for not picking up historical books earlier was a bit helpful – it seems that he also missed studying the many other bubbles throughout history.

Last but not least, I was hampered by plain, old-fashioned greed.

For some reason, I believed that I would parlay what I had already made on Wall Street into a Forbes type fortune from my internet investment. Even worse, many other great investors (who were actually on the Forbes 400 list) were making the same investment mistakes. "If they're doing it, it must be smart" was my thinking.

This is the height of folly when it comes to making investment decisions. It suggests a complete lack of independent thought, which is the hallmark of a novice investor.

Looking back now, I can say that my greed actually overwhelmed me. Curiously, I have always been a student of Warren Buffett's. His investment style has always fit my natural emotional disposition. But at the height of the boom, I even mocked his decision to stay on the sidelines. I convinced myself that he was "out of touch." As I studied my mistakes, I realized I was dead wrong about Buffett. He had done his homework and knew exactly what was going on. It was I who was truly out of touch.

How You Can Benefit from This

Whether you run a private business, own your own company, or simply invest in common stocks, you are an investor. We all do price/value calculations to determine where our time and money is best served.

But it's occurred to me that not many great investors discuss the single most important rule to becoming one: Having an awareness of our own human nature.

You see, without an understanding of your own nature, you will be controlled by your base emotions. Instead of using history and facts to see past the financial headlines, you will follow them; the result will be that your fear and greed instincts will control your investment decisions.

If that happens, mark my words, you will never make a killing in the field of investing. I know because I never made one until I transcended them.

Instead of the patience that comes with a strong understanding of history, you will be compelled to move at all times, which is a recipe for destruction. And finally, if you are unaware of yourself, your ego will find a way to cloud the facts, which will limit your ability to evolve.

When you are at the age when you sit on the porch with your grandchildren and they ask you about investing, one of two comments will come out. If you ignore this advice, you'll end up telling your grandchildren that Wall Street is a big casino that's rigged for the richest people in the world. This will have the intended effect: Your grandchildren will never take it seriously.

But, if you find yourself sitting on that porch one day and you're asked about Wall Street, you may say something far different indeed. You can pass on the knowledge that there is a "box," and the first order of business is to learn that it exists. Secondly, you will tell them that their ability to come back from ruin will mean far more than any success they ever have.

And finally, you will tell them that to be a master investor they have to understand and master their emotions. Then you will have truly passed on the kind of knowledge that allows our young ones to stand on our shoulders.

At least that's the way I see it at this point of my own evolution.

Enjoy the Week,

(Please let us know what you think about Dylan Jovine's article.)
Rate his article here »



Dylan Jovine
Chief Investment Officer
The Tycoon Report


Rate this article
Thank you for your vote!

16 Comments

Post your own comment
  1. Dylan (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Ken,



    Thanks for the question (and the understanding of my prior clarification).



    I am a value investor although the term itself has virtually zero meaning because it is used so often and with such disparate meaning.



    A more accurate description of what I do is I buy companies with "franchise pricing power" at what I consider to be a big discount to my estimated value. Since only 10percent of all publicly traded companies have pricing power (the by-product of a competitive moat so to speak) there are very few companies I can even purchase.



    As far as being a long-term investor: whenever I buy a business (either public or private) I take a 15 to 20 year time frame on my holding. (The lowest holding time I start an investment is 5 years).



    So yes, I guess you can say I'm a value investor in the sense that I try to buy companies for a large discount to what I think they're worth and I'm certainly a long-term investor as well.



    Cheers,



    Dylan Jovine
  2. Ken (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Dylan,



    Thanks, I do remember those heated conversations, and that is what I was refering to. I dont mean to pick on you, I dont recall exactly what you said, but it was more of a comeback than a recomendation. However my complaint was for everyone, at the time I recall it seemed like everyone decided to get on this bandwagon and support this stock pick, whether they directly recomended it as a pick of their own or not, none of them came out with any cautionary notes. All the caution, concerns, and secondary analysis were done by us, the readers. All your profesional staff could do was support the pick. The reason it comes back to you is that you are the head of this company, and therefor set presidence and are responsible for the overall attitude and tone.





    On a different note. How can you be a value investor and not be long term? The two terms seem to be kind of attached to each other.

    Are you perhaps more of a value trader, who uses value as a trading criteria, in conjuntion with other perhaps more important criteria, such as a chart pattern, or a good catalyst?

    Perhaps I have it all wrong. Do you consider yourself to be a value investor?
  3. Dylan (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Ken,



    I never recommended Citigroup. How do I know this? Because I never buy companies where I don't understand their balance sheets.



    You must go back and check my articles and see for yourself. I did mention it in one article I wrote because the week after Jason recommended it the stock declined and people wrote crazy comments and I just reminded them that Jay is a long term investor.



    But not I.



    Dylan
  4. Ken (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Dylan,



    Jason wasnt the only one to recomend CitiGroup in these pages. I'm pretty sure you did, I know Chris Rowe did, and I'm not sure about Teeka.



    I certainly dont mind you pointing out what you see fundamentaly, I find it very insightfull as its not something that I do very well, I do however mind you recomending that amateur investors buy distressed stocks without any safeguards, such as a better analysis of the risk involved, a properly set stop loss level, etc.



    I understand, your a value investor, most value investors would rather buy more when the bottom falls out, than attempt to manage a trade. Personaly I'd rather sit in cash than play that game. What I dont understand is the suposed traders on your staff, who got their readers into a dumb trade, like C, and didnt bother to get them out.



    Ken
  5. Dylan (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Jester:



    Would you like me to pass your Citigroup comment to the person who actually recommended the stock in the Tycoon Report - Jason Jovine?



    Otherwise I'm not quite sure why you'd post that comment in my column in relation to my article.



    (I know it's a bit confusing - two names, two different people, but the same last name) but based on what I've read from your writings you seem to be a fairly smart guy - at least smarter than such a simple mistake.



    One big difference between a professional and an amateur is the ability to admit mistakes (i.e. how would one ever advance if they were not able to admit mistakes).



    That being said, I once again suggest you use that powerful brain of yours to put Jason's Citigroup recommendation into some context:



    Citigroup is the only stock Jason recommended that didn't make money after the reco was made.



    How many other stocks did he recommend? What were the returns on them?



    Also: should I include, among your other suggested columns, a column for all the positive testimonials that Jason received from people that made money from his recommendations?



    Dylan Jovine
  6. W (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Love the story

    Where does the author live, Jacksonville?
  7. Ken (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Great article, it was great the first time I read it and it still is.



    I agree with Jester on the subject of C. I can undrstand you as a value investor recomending it, I dont expect much more from a true value investor. But somehow you managed to get all the other editors to hop on your bandwagon and pump it. I think its high time they came clean about where there alligiances lie, with the company stand on value, or with the trend and common sense.
  8. JJT (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Very good article - I'm sure you knew that Intelligent Investor was written in 1949 - you're thinking of Graham's other book Security Analysis 1934 (which is far heavier going).
  9. Penny (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    SICK JOKE Mahler! But.... that's you!
  10. jester112358 (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    While we're reviewing mistakes based upon a fundamental mis-reading of the true economic conditions, let's have a column outlining the bad reasoning behind the call to buy C, Citibank a couple of months ago at around $28 and then again at $22. Those who did the opposite, bought puts have profited greatly since they understood that banks have no meaningful way to generate income since they now must cut dividends and dilute shares to raise capital to cover unrealized, unrecognized losses.



    Let's have a column and comments from readers on the worst newsletter advice they have received and why they either believed the advice, ignored it, or did the opposite. And why do newsletters only mention the best advice they ever gave? A famous quote comes to mind: "those who can do, those who can't teach"

Add Your Comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed.

Please fill in the missing field(s).

Important: To comment on Tycoon Report articles, you must first log in. If you are a paying customer of Tycoon, you may use the same login and password that you use normally. If you do not yet have a login, please take a moment to register below. It’s free, and you only need to do it once.

Register

(email address and password information will NOT be displayed publicly)

Name *

Email *

Password *

Subscribe to The Tycoon Report
By registering, you agree to our terms of service.

Already a member? Log in!

(you will not be taken away from this page)

Email *

Password *

Remember?

Forgot Password?




Important Notice to all stock spammers, scammers and penny stock pump-and-dumpers: You will get no respect here. Don’t bother submitting fraudulent or misleading information in the guise of an article, because we will remove it. Any piece of content submitted on this site can be removed at the sole discretion of the Tycoon staff.