Digg It |   Del.icio.us |   Printer Friendly |   PDF |   Email

Finding Entry Points in an Uptrend. Buying on a pullback...

Thursday, October 4, 2007 | Chris Rowe

Rating:
Members of The Trend Rider made big profits by taking bearish positions before and in the very early stages of the recent correction.  At the bottom of the correction, we went bullish on certain positions, some of which moved 40% - 50% higher in about a month.

There are SO MANY reasons to be bullish right now, it's scary.  But at the same time, you want to stay calm and not be emotional.  You want to buy at the right price, not chase stocks (or call options) higher, right?

It's hard to be patient when the market is gunning higher, isn't it?

What you want to do is to buy the strongest stocks within the strongest sectors - but you want to buy them on a pullback.  But how do we know how much a stock is going to retreat before its next advance?

There are a number of ways, most having to do with past support levels, many in the form of popular moving averages and trend lines.  I have a number of simple indicators that I use to decide what to trade and when.

But today I'm going to go over one of the most basic "Technical Analysis 101" principles that will lay down a foundation for understanding how far a stock is likely to retreat before the next bull run.

Don't forget, these are just the basics, and you will increase your accuracy when you consider the following principle in conjunction with identification of past support and resistance levels.

“The 50% Retracement” Rule








You always want to trade in the direction of the trend.  And a trend is obviously a series of zig-zags.  These zig-zags obviously move in the direction of the trend and then retrace before continuing in that same direction.  (Like I said, technical analysis 101.)

While secondary parameters are set at 33% and 66%, the most common percentage retracement before resumption is the 50% retracement.

I know, this might sound absolutely crazy if this is your first time hearing it, but if you look at a bunch of stock or index charts after reading this article and apply these percentage retracement principles, you’ll be absolutely amazed!

The way that traders use this application, for example, would be to look for approximately a 5-point retracement after a stock advances by 10 points from a low to a new high (because 5 points is 50% of the 10-point gain).

So when a stock trades 10 points higher from $15.00 to $25.00 and then reverses lower, traders would look for support around $20.00.

Again, this is certainly not a strict rule, and the secondary parameters wouldn’t have been set near 33% and 66% if it were.  In fact, other theories set retracement parameters around 62% and 38% while maintaining the 50% point as the average retracement.

Secondary Parameters

When it comes to retracements, 66% is a critical area.  For instance, in the case of an uptrend, if a stock retraces 66% of the recent move and starts to bounce higher again, it’s considered to be a relatively low-risk buying opportunity.  But if the 66% retracement area is violated, a reversal of the prior uptrend is very likely. 

This is also true in the case of a downtrend.  If a downtrending stock retraces about 66% of the recent decline and resumes its downtrend, that area is a good place to sell-short the stock or buy put options.  If the downtrending stock retraces more than 66% of the recent decline, then the downtrend is likely to reverse to an uptrend.

But, keep in mind that in a stronger trending stock (or stock market), the retracements are much more likely to be between 33% - 50% of the recent gain.  And this is, of course, a strong trending market. 

The market corrected by over 10% to oversold levels not seen since the 2002-2003 bear market bottom.  A correction like that is incredibly healthy.  And the next market advance would likely have stood on weak legs had this recent decline not been so brutal. 

The correction shook out lots of weak institutional investors that otherwise would have been quick to take trading profits on every stock market advance, thus adding supply pressure to the market.

So don't be afraid to get bullish, and don't get so crazy that you're chasing stock.

Test this out by staring at five charts, and I bet you'll be shocked (if this concept is new to you).  Let me show you what to look for with one example...


Stock Example





- Stock moves from about $2.20 to about $3.50 (not counting intraday movement).  This is a $1.30 advance, half of which is 65 cents.  The stock retraced by about 60 cents.  (This retracement also coincided with the gap higher, which tends to act as the new support level.)

-  Stock then moves from about $2.90 to $3.25 (a 35-cent move).  Fifty percent of that is 17.5 cents.  The stock retraced by nearly that amount before moving higher.

- Then focus on the blue box.  You can see that after a 50% pullback, the stock gapped even lower, and the trend reversed from an uptrend to a downtrend.

- Between August and September, the stock traded from about $2.60 to $3.20 (a 60-cent move), followed by a retracement of about 30 cents.

- Then, if you check out the blue line, the intermediate move was from $2.90 to about $4.20 (a $1.30 move), followed by a retracement of nearly 65 cents.

- If you look at many of the short-term retracements and resumptions within the intermediate move (blue line), you'll see similar action.

This chart happens to have lots of 50% retracements.  But remember the secondary parameters, and try to match them with past established support or resistance levels to estimate retracements.

And remember, this is a very basic principle.  I thought I would give you something today that was far from complex.  The good news is that other, more "sophisticated" parameters that traders look for are just as easy to understand!

(Please let us know what you think about Chris Rowe's article.)
Rate his article here »

“Profit from the Trend”

Chris Rowe
Chief Investment Officer
The Trend Rider


Rate this article
Thank you for your vote!

44 Comments

Post your own comment
  1. dennis (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    LOL. I commented on your commentary at financialsence. LOL> THis article is kinda interesting. So what do you figure on a stock like Etrade? 50% kinda went out the window on that one. Can't say I wasn't warned though. I gotta believe that this bank thing is a complete miscarriage on reality.Banks have never been profitable, because they are lending institutions under federal reserve control. If the Fed were abolished, then banks may once again become profitable.(non Politically controlled) Of course they could become suseptable to robbery once again. Anymore I can't think of anyone who would want to rob a digital computer scam politically controlled.LOL
  2. dennis (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Gotta say that was quite cute.Can't say as I have reached lion statis yet. I often trade or act like all the animals in the jungle at one time or another.Its just getting out before my face molds into any particular animal look a like that concerns me.LOL.
  3. Judy (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Whst a enjoyable article to read.
  4. Teri (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    About customer service...I work for a small ISP and have done tech support for Charter and Verizon wireless. Companies consider customer service to be an expense and can't wait to get rid of skilled employees. They prefer to replace them with someone working for an outsourcer or overseas.



    You might be surprised to learn what it is like on the other side of the phone. I routinely have people scream at me. I had a woman yesterday tell me that I'd better have someone out there by five to fix her service or she'd call the attorney general. When I asked for her name again, so I could get the right account, she hung up on me. I quite often get lectures from customers about what they consider customer service to be. Mostly, that seems to be, do what I want immediately. However, I'm not in charge of the company I work for. If there are not enough field techs or if someone is out sick, there's not a lot I can do to fix that. I try to offer whatever solution I have, but sometimes I simply don't have a solution. When I worked for Charter, there was a known problem in Morgan Hill area. They told us to tell the customers that there were no problems, but they were repaired when they replaced equipment. Their internet service was problematic for over a month. This is a problem at the corporate level.



    It has been my experience that many people in customer service truly want to help resolve the issue. Sometime, we just get ground down by the working conditions. The outsourcer for Verizon wireless did not even provide us with foam rubber for our phone headsets. Some women there crocheted covers, to keep the headsets from digging into your ears. You carried them with you from seat to seat, as you did not have an assigned place to work. If you would like more, feel free to drop me a line. At least my current job really is tech support. At Charter, they wanted me to focus on sales. You can't do that, when you can't provide good service.
  5. Mark (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Ha, I bet you get thousands of comments like the one I want to make; I went to a Burger King, in Crescent City California early in 2003 and ordered a Whopper, and I was halfway finished consuming it when I removed the rest of the paper wrapper and discovered to my horror that there was a large bite already missing from it. I nearly wretched then took it to the counter and complained, the high school girl at the counter got the "manager" who said I was a liar because they NEVER return rejected food items to the inventory, that I had taken that bite myself in order to get a refund. I asked how to contact BK to complain, but these are franchises are individually owned and BK has nothing to do with them, so I was told. And sure enough an extensive web search revealed a website for BK but no way to contact anything resembling a customer care page. You have to do a property assessors search to find out who owns the restaurant in question, and then you have to figure out how to find the owner and hope if you can they will listen to you. If I were litigious I would have sued because the whole episode still bothers me more than 4 years later, and while I found out who owned the store it did not good because the owners are very hard to contact and did not return any calls. Guess what? I have never spent another dime in ANY Burger King since. And that was my exclusive fast food joint, getting at least two or three visits a week for years preceding the episode. So, their compartmentalization of ownership might be a great business model from some points of view, but all BK owners are suffering the loss of my business because of one bad owner. And, this also wrecked my faith in the cleanliness of fast food for good, I do still hit some of them for a quick meal occasionally, but the number is down to a few times a year not per week.
  6. Paul (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Perhaps you should consult the website wwww.shadowstats.com before making ridiculous comments like we're at "full employment" - I believe the real unemployment rate, as calculated logically, is OVER 12%. Furthermore, the BLS is now using a so-called "birth-death" model to predict the net number of new jobs resulting from the "birth" of more new businesses than from the loss of jobs from the "death" of others. Conceptually, the idea is valid. Yet, the BLS refuses to share the model with anyone. I suppose it just wouldn't do for someone to be able refute the "phantom" jobs created by the aforementioned model, now would it? For many of the last 6 or 8 months, the vast majority of new jobs supposed created have been "added?" to the economy via the birth-death model. To my knowledge, no one has independently validated the accuracy of this model. So, go ahead and believe the lies. Just don't expect anyone with "half a lick" of sense to listen..>>.. paulb
  7. IP (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    interesting article, but you completely ignore the time value of money. By your approach, you've been sitting with Microsoft for 5 years, while I just got in 2 weeks ago. While your money has been tied up in a dead investment, I've been in oil stocks. Your approach may allow you to sleep at night, but unless you are a lucky investor, your portfolio is hung with crap like Wal-Mart and Dupont that are going nowhere. Stocks can stay cheap for years. Livermore was right. You should adopt his approach, it works.
  8. Donald (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    This is one of the best articles I've read on entry points. Very well illustrated and concise and to the point.



    Don
  9. Julia (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Thanks for the simplicity of the article - I understood everything! Now I can better gauge when to get into a stock/option.
  10. Victor (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Great information Chris - does this info relate back to Fibonnacci retracement levels?

Add Your Comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed.

Please fill in the missing field(s).

Important: To comment on Tycoon Report articles, you must first log in. If you are a paying customer of Tycoon, you may use the same login and password that you use normally. If you do not yet have a login, please take a moment to register below. It’s free, and you only need to do it once.

Register

(email address and password information will NOT be displayed publicly)

Name *

Email *

Password *

Subscribe to The Tycoon Report
By registering, you agree to our terms of service.

Already a member? Log in!

(you will not be taken away from this page)

Email *

Password *

Remember?

Forgot Password?




Important Notice to all stock spammers, scammers and penny stock pump-and-dumpers: You will get no respect here. Don’t bother submitting fraudulent or misleading information in the guise of an article, because we will remove it. Any piece of content submitted on this site can be removed at the sole discretion of the Tycoon staff.