Digg It |   Del.icio.us |   Printer Friendly |   PDF |   Email

Are Home Prices Falling, or Being Pushed Down?

Friday, April 10, 2009 | Ethan Roberts

Rating:
One of the most frequent questions that I am asked these days is, "Are we close to a bottom in the housing market yet?"

It's a tough question because, just like with stocks, there are multiple forces at work that are all painting a rather confusing picture of the real estate market.  And every time I think I just about have it figured out, something else happens that simply leaves me scratching my head in bewilderment.



Dang it, now what?!

Take this past week, for example.  The stock market was moving up on word that pending home sales were once again higher.  Now, I don't put a lot of stock (no pun intended) into pending home sales, because almost 40% of the current pending contracts are failing to close because the buyers can't get loan approval!  Even though the buyers are pre-qualified, usually by automated underwriting systems, when the files go to the underwriters, they are still being rejected.

I'll give you one example.  Let's say someone decides they want to move out of their home, rent it out and then move into another home.  At one time, this would have been a simple loan to approve, with a contingency of course, that the borrower would have to have a valid lease on their former home in place prior to closing on the new one. 

But now, underwriters have become concerned about something known as "Buy and bail."  This is the term for a person who moves out of an expensive home that was financed near the market peak with a zero-down mortgage, moves into a similar (but now less-expensive) home, rents out the old home for a while, but then just lets it go into foreclosure. 

The owner knows that their credit will take a hit, but they have already bought another home. And especially if they have a well-running car, they may not even care whether their credit is ruined for a few years.  They just walk away from the upside-down mortgage, which is usually much more than the rent payments they are receiving.  Therefore, the underwriters do not want to approve a new loan for borrowers in this situation, whether they have any intention or not of doing the "buy and bail."

Essentially, all will suffer for the sins of a few.

So the only valid real estate statistic, as I have mentioned before, is the closed sale.  That means a done deal, with the escrow closed and the keys handed over to the new buyer.  Wall Street gets all excited when the National Association of Realtors puts out statistics about the pending sales, but right now it's really just a public relations shell game.



 A young homebuyer gets a lesson in pending home sales

Now, I always have to be careful not to make assumptions about the national real estate market based solely on the statistics of my own region in Northeast Florida.  But I can tell you that, for the last year or two, the monthly sales here have been a surprisingly accurate forecast for how the rest of the country will do.  In fact, knowing how my area has done before the national real estate news comes out, gives me an advantage in knowing whether to trade stock indexes long or short prior to the announcements.

Interestingly, the recent sales in my area are showing improvement.  The March closed sales numbers were higher than the ones in February, and February was also up from January.  Folks, this is a very good sign. 

Also, the March 2009 year-over-year closed sales were almost identical to the March 2008 number.  This is a trend that actual began last September, and has continued each and every month since then, and would suggest a bottoming process.

However, as I also mentioned in last week's article, close to half of all the sales right now are either foreclosures or short sales.   While this is reducing the huge total inventory of unsold homes, it is doing very little for the majority of unsold non-distressed homes on the market.  In fact, the cheaper prices of the foreclosures are steering people away from the non-distressed homes.

There was a time when a foreclosure or two in a neighborhood would not have much of an effect upon the appraisal on a non-distressed home sale.  It was typical for appraisers to use three regular sales within the last six months from the same neighborhood, when determining a home value for a sale or a refinance.  When there weren't enough sales in that specific neighborhood, they were permitted to look within a two-mile radius to find comparative sales. 

However, things are changing radically.  New announcements are mandating that appraisers to use at least two comparable sales from only the last 90 days, and only from within a one-mile radius.  Since there have been fewer sales, they have to use foreclosure or short sales more often when doing appraisals, and this is trouncing the value of the subject homes.

One has to wonder if the forces from above (i.e., FHA, Fannie Mae) are now putting pressure on appraisers to push prices down in an effort to force a price bottom and an increase in sales.  Question:  Is this the capitulation stage of the real estate market, and is it being artificially induced so as to speed up the U.S. recovery? 

Or am I just being paranoid?

 


Ethan, with another paranoia-induced sleepless night ...
 
Another kick in the real estate teeth was an announcement that I saw from Wells Fargo Wholesale Lending, changing their minimum credit score requirements for conventional loans from 620 to 720, a reduction in debt-to-income ratios from 45% to 41%, and an increase from 80% to 85% loan-to-value for cash-out refinances.  These changes are likely due to pressure from the Private Mortgage Insurance companies, who are looking to reduce their risk of loss.

Another negative is that we are also seeing an increase in the default rate for FHA loans.  The default rate has recently risen from 5% to 7%.  Default is defined as either 90 days overdue or already in foreclosure.  If this continues, taxpayer dollars may have to be used to subsidize the FHA mortgage insurance program for the very first time.  Said HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan, "We should, within a few weeks, be able to present to you our estimates of whether (or not) it will be self-financing."

Donovan also defended the default increase by comparing FHA to the subprime loans and noting that the subprime default rate of 23% was much higher. 

What kind of rationale is that?  Seven out of every 100 loans are going into default, but that's OK with Mr. Donovan because 23 out of every 100 subprime loans have defaulted? 

This is the very same program that President Obama and other government officials boasted would NOT have to be subsidized by Average Joe and Sally because the Mortgage Insurance Premium (MIP) built into in all FHA loans would cover any and all defaults.


 
Even the normally stoic feline had to laugh at that one ...

What we are left with is an interesting tug-of-war between the government's stimulus and home-ownership programs, versus the ever-tightening of the (government-controlled) Fannie Mae and FHA credit markets.  Give the first-time homebuyer an $8,000 tax credit for buying a home, but then pressure the lenders to make it as difficult as possible for that buyer to qualify.  Lower the interest rates to historically low levels, then increase the mandatory FICO scores, downpayments and debt-to-income ratio.



It's the government vs the government in an absurd tug-of-war ...

I'm not saying that these increased lender restrictions are bad.  Far from it; I do think we need to make the standards tougher than in previous years, to decrease the threat of future defaults.  My objection is with a government that pretends to really want to help the little guy while, behind the scenes, it does everything it can do to prevent the little guy from obtaining his dream. 

So, that giant screeching noise you may be hearing right now is not the sound of home prices falling, so much as it is the sound of home prices being artificially pushed down as quickly as possible.  When the bottom will actually come is still anybody's guess!



Capitulation, anyone?


 
See you next week!
 


(Please let us know what you think about Ethan Roberts's article.)
Rate his article here »



Ethan Roberts
Contributing Editor
The Tycoon Report


Rate this article
Thank you for your vote!

17 Comments

Post your own comment
  1. marilyn (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    This is a *****...great commentary and informative! Keep up the good work. We

    really appreciate it. I believe you are

    correct about prices in real estate being

    pushed down.
  2. jim (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Why does the goverment have to be so involved when a person buys a home? It seems they are worried about the 8% who can't make their house payment,not the 92% who are doing just fine. I had a home loan in the mid 1980's that started out a 10% interest and then moved to 13 1/2%. Did I complain about the bank or expect the goverment to do something.? No I just tighten my belt and paid as much as possible on my house payment. Then I paid off a 20 year note in 7 1/2 years. I was not in a high paying job, in fact I was in the lowest paying job the company had. I am not patting myself on the back, but the bank or the goverment didn't get me into that loan. Of course I was raised back in the depression and was taught when you made your bed you layed in it. With common sence, hard work, in a free America you can make it.
  3. sandy (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Mr. Roberts blog questioning is the home market bottoming or being pushed down is right on in addressing the economic issue of our times. But it is clear that we learned that this problem was caused by getting people who were poor risks to buy homes. Now the problem is to get people who cannot afford the homes they bought into apartments and the people in apartments who can afford to buy homes to do so. Hence the mixed message in policy. The other part of the problem is what to do with the excess of housing in the different markets. That means looking at vacancy rates in housing and apartments. For some reason I do not see much information about vacancy rates. I am sure that lots of the foreclosed homes are being bought by investors as rentals at this time. I think what I am trying to say is that we cannot separate the overall housing market from the market for houses. To me that seems to be a part of the discussion that is being inadequately covered.
  4. Clyde (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Bravo! Excellent article and evaluation of the current situation. I have been saying pretty much the same thing for the last several months. The only people that can qualify are the wealthy. Once again the rich get richer, the poor get poorer and the middle class foots the bill.



    I can see a way to help this situation, but no one (meaning the banks and government) would want to consider it. The banks and subprime lenders got us into this mess now let them get us out of it. Lower the interest rates on all existing and new home loans to 2% APR across the board. Imagine what this would do for the economy. A home owner paying 8% APR on a $200,000.00 (or roughly $16,000.00 interest per year) would now only have to pay 2% APR (or roughly $4,000.00 inerest per year). This gives the home owner an extra $1,000.00 each month to put back into circulation. Forget the refunds and rebates to the home owners, give them interest rates that will put money into their pockets and back into the economy that will make a difference. I have email Obama regarding this idea twice but never heard back and did not think that I would. The idea is to controversial and would probably never be accepted. I could say a lot more on this subject but will leave it for now.
  5. Gilbert (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Too bad the "little guy" on the street doesn't understand how he is being "screwed" by the government, both past and present. His tax money is going to prop up the same people that is hurting the housing market and raising the interest rates on his last source of working capital, his credit cards, while he struggles to hold onto his small business awaiting recovery. Now, let's hit him with the carbon tax in his utilty bill. That's good for the poor and the retirees. However, paradise is just ahead, because everyone knows how efficient the government is in taking our money and deciding how to re-distribute it for just what we need.
  6. delbertino (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    I appreciate your illuminating article and agree that the government is turning life into a partial differential equation. But I can't understand why anyone would buy a house in the US. Obama is a socialist and will rip the profit from any enterprise. It's OK to be paranoid if someone really is out to 'get' you; the government is out to get you, really; especially this one. thanx for the article and your time and thoughtfulness and urgency in imparting savvy.
  7. Brian (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    What does the government (Obama) have to do with banks tightening their lending standards?



    Please clarify this because as far as I can tell, they are trying to get banks to LOOSEN lending to get cash flowing again?



    Please, what does Obama have to do with lending standards? I realize the political landscape has a lot to do with finances, but Obama isn't telling banks to raise their lending standards.
  8. Hans (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Here's a relevant link to the worsening commercial RE crisis that Dusty mentions. Does this disaster ever end?

    http://www.investmentnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081026/REG/310279976
  9. Clint (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    We are near the housing market bottom for one huge reason:



    I am currently in escrow (closing in 2 weeks) to buy a home that's value has been cut in half and with the mortgage payment I'll have I can actually rent the home for more than it costs to own it. At that level the logical bottom has already been surpassed. I believe this is the opportunity of a lifetime for young people to be buying their first home. Unfortunately VERY few people my age have been raised with the basics of finance and/or the lessons and benefits of frugality. Those that have will be owning homes for less than it costs to rent. The others will be left with no choice but to continue to rent and throw money away.
  10. Hans (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Ethan, excellent article! Thank you for giving us the data and the explanations for what is really happening.

Add Your Comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed.

Please fill in the missing field(s).

Important: To comment on Tycoon Report articles, you must first log in. If you are a paying customer of Tycoon, you may use the same login and password that you use normally. If you do not yet have a login, please take a moment to register below. It’s free, and you only need to do it once.

Register

(email address and password information will NOT be displayed publicly)

Name *

Email *

Password *

Subscribe to The Tycoon Report
By registering, you agree to our terms of service.

Already a member? Log in!

(you will not be taken away from this page)

Email *

Password *

Remember?

Forgot Password?




Important Notice to all stock spammers, scammers and penny stock pump-and-dumpers: You will get no respect here. Don’t bother submitting fraudulent or misleading information in the guise of an article, because we will remove it. Any piece of content submitted on this site can be removed at the sole discretion of the Tycoon staff.