Digg It |   Del.icio.us |   Printer Friendly |   PDF |   Email

Fed's Latest $800B Plan: Will it Work?

Wednesday, November 26, 2008 | Teeka Tiwari

Rating:
[Editor's Note: All of us in the Tycoon family are taking some time off for the Thanksgiving holiday. We'll be back on Monday, December 1. Happy Thanksgiving, Tycoon readers!]

Ah it’s good to be the king! When you can make money appear out of thin air, have little to no oversight and can make decisions that affect the lives of billions of people, how can you not feel like a king? Hank Paulson and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke now have more power over the global economy than any ancient ruler of old.

I’m not suggesting that these fellows are doing anything untoward, but it is a little unnerving how much power these guys have. What happens if either one has a heart attack or slips in the tub? Will the rest of the financial system slip away with them? Does anybody in the government even know how to handle our current economic situation? It sure looks like they are making it up as they go along.

The latest scheme hatched by the brilliant minds at the Fed involves another $800 billion being pumped into the finance system.

Here’s the problem, the Fed and the Treasury have been pumping billions of pesos err … I mean dollars into the banking system in an attempt to shore up their balance sheets and spur lending, but the banks are refusing to lend. The consumer finance market in particular has collapsed, I mean seriously disappeared. We went from doing $50 billion in consumer finance backed bonds back in October 2007 (which was already a slow month) to a measly $500 million in October 2008.

That’s terrifying for the Fed because it means that we are looking at a complete shutdown of consumer-driven purchases. Consumer credit is the grease of consumer spending. Without it, the whole machine seizes up. It’s not all the banks' fault either. Fear of impending job losses is causing many Americans to ratchet back their lifestyle in a big way. Even if consumer credit were readily available, I don’t know that we’d see a stampede of people taking advantage of it.

The Fed is proposing making $200 billion available through what they call a “term asset-backed securities loan facility” or TALF. It’s essentially going to be used to support bonds that are backed by consumer and small business debt like credit cards, student loans, and auto loans. In the past the providers of consumer credit would simply package their loan portfolios into bonds, sell them off, and originate more loans.

What’s happening now is that no one is buying these bonds so the loan originators don’t have the liquidity they need to make more loans. Let’s look at this logically; can we really blame the marketplace for not wanting to buy great big slugs of American credit card and auto loan debt right now???

Will a government guarantee even matter? Fannie's and Freddie's bonds are government guaranteed, but they are still trading like they have the black plague. This recent initiative just doesn’t look like enough to get liquidity back into the consumer debt market.

From a macro point of view, the consumer still has a ways to go before bottoming out. Consumer spending hasn’t bottomed yet, consumer credit defaults haven’t bottomed yet, and most importantly unemployment hasn’t bottomed yet. Until that actually occurs or there is a market perception of that occurring at a specific time in the future, then the consumer credit market will remain on lockdown.

Put yourself in the shoes of an institutional risk manager. As a professional, you want to be expanding credit into an economic up cycle and contracting credit during an economic down cycle. Why would you accelerate your lending going into a down cycle? It makes no sense for the Fed to try and incentivize lending going into a down cycle. It’s actually irresponsible. Try as he might, Ben Bernanke and the U.S. economy are not above the inexorable power of the business cycle, nobody is.

So what turns this around?

The number 1 issue plaguing both debt and equity markets right now is lack of earnings and business conditions visibility. Until that visibility returns, we will be mired in the to-and-fro of a manic depressive, sentiment-driven stock market. As soon as the smart money can get a clear bead on when business conditions and corporate earnings have bottomed, we will see this market have an explosive and prolonged move to the upside.

We as investors want to keep our eyes out for some of the tell-tale signs. They include stabilizing housing prices, stabilizing building permits, declining foreclosures, upside earnings surprises, and consumer and business credit expansion.

Think about this, when housing does finally stabilize, it will set the stage for a torrent of new bank lending which will reignite both consumers and corporations. Every month that housing prices go down, the banks have to keep marking down their vast real estate portfolios. When the bottom finally hits in housing, the banks will be in a position where their net capital will actually be increasing each quarter, not declining. They will be able to lend against a growing equity base rather than a shrinking one. In short, they will have the confidence to lend again that comes with asset value visibility.
 
So my recommendation is to look at housing. It’s the banks' biggest asset, as soon as housing prices stop going down, the banks will start lending again and it will be the beginning of a brand, new up cycle.



(Please let us know what you think about Teeka Tiwari's article.)
Rate his article here »

“Let the Game Come to You.”

Teeka Tiwari
Chief Investment Officer
Point & Profit




Rate this article
Thank you for your vote!

22 Comments

Post your own comment
  1. K (4 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    The only way out of this mess is to put people back to work. That means producing real products that people want and need. That means reindustrialization. That means producing our own cars, steel, energy, electronics, etc. That means limiting, taxing, or banning certain imported products while production and demand ramps back up here. We can't pay off our debt to the world by serving each other hamburgers! The "service economy" rides on the back of a "production economy".



    Secondly, the usurous banks are destroying the personal finances of thousands of people trying to make it on minimum wage incomes. Banks borrow money from the people (the Fed) at 1% and charge customers anywhere from 18% to 32% for loans. Once anybody gets caught in that web, they will be sucked dry. We need usury laws again.



    Until the clowns in government realize that it is the people who need saving and not the banks there will never be any hope of recovery from this depression.
  2. Roger (5 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Dusty has a CLUE as to what to expect when he wrote

    of the Credit Suisse chart on [Mortgage Resets]

    Find it on Google and see that Sub-Prime is just

    Tip o'the Iceberg for what lies ahead. When home

    values plateaued in 2005 <www.zillow.com> it setup

    SubPrimes to default in 2007/08 because borrowers

    could not reset by simple refinancing- home had lost its value. Defaults should subside in 2009 but ahead are RESETS for other ARMS in 2010/11

    This means get ready for another round of melt

    downs as a new wave of foreclosures ensues. Any

    one who thinks we are halfway thru a Recession

    just hasn't got the facts, hasn't got a CLUE!

    We are seeing the onset of a 2nd Great Depression

    Solution was to limit family size like China, but

    us Americans didn't do that did we?
  3. Joseph (5 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    No!
  4. Craig (5 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    These last rallies seem to be more than just an oversold market gasping for breath. After the announcement of $800B+ it appears as though many in the market believe that this will provide the final support to the financials and real estate markets.



    SRS and SKF hit 52week highs just before these rallies and are now off by almost 50%. Is it the wrong time to be in SKF and SRS?
  5. Thomas (5 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Thanks Teeka for your insight - a good time for us to stick together and ride this storm to our advantage, while keeping a prayer for the survival of the good old USA!
  6. jester112358 (5 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    You can't solve a debt addiction problem by either individuals, companies or the government by taking on more debt. You can only postpone it-like the slow torture Japan has been enduring for the last 20 years. Its better to have a quick and even catastrophic credit contraction and get it over with. Booms are always followed by busts-and the last 20 years have been the biggest boom ever so it will likely be the largest bust. This asset deflation rewards savers, companies and investors who did not overleverage and have low debt/equity. These are the entities who should survive. An example is apple with over $24B in cash and no debt. What does apple care if it can borrow money for operations? Or what to I care that credit is difficult to obtain-I'll pay cash like I did for my last vehicle a couple of years back. Unfortunately, governments and politicians hate deflation and only favor inflation.



    As another commentor indicated, we need to stop borrowing from other more productive nations like China and start producing and saving more ourselves. Otherwise, the US itself will be forced into default. We need to de-leverage our debt before another expansion cycle can begin. Even the government cannot prevent this natural phenomena of asset deflation-particularly housing which is a very unproductive asset class. Less capital for the FIRE economy (finance, insurance, real estate) and more for the real economy-energy production, drug discovery, biotech, etc. will allow us to innovate and produce our way to prospersity.



    I would look for median/average house prices to reach the $150K level from the current $180-190K level. This would bring them into the historical 3:1 range of price:mean income. And we are likely to overshoot this to the downside. So, average or median house prices of $130K would be a safe re-entry point for a bottom to the market.
  7. tipalia (5 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Thanks Teeka for sharing some thoughts with us .

    Can you tell us if the 800 billions for the consumers are in place instead of the 700 billions to bailout the financial institutions or on top of the 700 billions? it gets so confusing numbers are coming from everywhere these days. Thanks again,

    tipalia
  8. Earl (6 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Teeka is correct, I think, in stressing the poor and cloudy earnings outlook in view of the national and indeed international weakness in business of all types. I do not quite see how Teeka indicates that banks have their future in rising housing markets. They do not, I believe, own much real estate but they have a regretably large investment in mortgages which gives them a contingent interest in the real estate market. With the market declining there they will have momre delinguencies and have to write down and even write off many mortagage loans, as we all know now. However, I find it hard to believe that banks like Citi which has now had the benefit of investments from the great Buffet, Prince Walid (?) and others plus the infusion of $ 10billion of U.S. taxpayer's money plus the guarantee by the US against more losses on their paper, lost all this money on real estate. How many of their cdos, cmos and other toxic assets derived from soured loans made to the business community? I do not see how the government can properly put a floor under housing prices as some now suggest. There never was a ceiling put on when these prices rose beyond all reason. No one ever complains while Greenspan sets prime rates at 1% or less - and continues that during prosperous times. Everyone wants immediate satisfaction now. Phil Graham was right when he said this is a nation of whiners. The whines will continue until the next market drop - when they will rise to a howl.
  9. Paul (6 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Instead of bailing out banks why doesn't the US Govt. set up a public housing trust and go out to the market to buy up on foreclosed housing. That would soon put a floor under the housing market. It would also provide a lot of new govt jobs setting it up.

    Of course it's a bit more work than just printing money to buy paper (or electronic blips in a machine). Then in the next housing upturn they can offload at a profit to prevent a repeat of the bubble.



    Just a simplisitc view from across the Pacific...
  10. alan (6 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    these government bailouts are idiotic. one of the reasons for the credit mess is that consumers borrowed too much and saved too little. now the government is encouraging consumers to take on more debt? it is a combination of banks being afraid to lend and consumers being afraid to borrow. the only solution to the economic mess is TIME! people are losing their jobs. they need time to find employment and pay down their current debt, not to take on new debt. the government needs to let nature take its course. if corporations fail, so be it. new ones will eventually arise to replace the ones that fail.

Add Your Comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed.

Please fill in the missing field(s).

Important: To comment on Tycoon Report articles, you must first log in. If you are a paying customer of Tycoon, you may use the same login and password that you use normally. If you do not yet have a login, please take a moment to register below. It’s free, and you only need to do it once.

Register

(email address and password information will NOT be displayed publicly)

Name *

Email *

Password *

Subscribe to The Tycoon Report
By registering, you agree to our terms of service.

Already a member? Log in!

(you will not be taken away from this page)

Email *

Password *

Remember?

Forgot Password?




Important Notice to all stock spammers, scammers and penny stock pump-and-dumpers: You will get no respect here. Don’t bother submitting fraudulent or misleading information in the guise of an article, because we will remove it. Any piece of content submitted on this site can be removed at the sole discretion of the Tycoon staff.