Digg It |   Del.icio.us |   Printer Friendly |   PDF |   Email

What a Democrat in the White House Means to Your Wallet

Thursday, November 6, 2008 | Marie Albin

Rating:
Okay, so your preferred presidential candidate may or may not have won the election on Tuesday, but you have to admit that it is nice to know that we live in a free democracy where opinions can differ and the ruling party can change hands without bloodshed.

Right? Right?!

So let’s focus on the bright side today. Did you know that the stock market historically performs better under Democratic presidents? Certainly, yesterday’s nearly 500-point drubbing on the Dow doesn’t exactly bode well. But the data does.

According to the bible on historic stock market trends, Stock Trader’s Almanac, the Dow has posted bigger average returns under Democratic presidents during election cycles since World War II. Since 1953, Democratic presidents have presided over a 9.1% increase in the Dow, while Republicans have seen an 8% increase.

Granted, that’s not a big spread, but post-election years prove to be much better for Democrats and the Dow. The Dow has historically risen 9.7% in a post-election year when a Democrat won vs. falling 1.2% when a Republican took office.

Jeffrey Hirsch, editor-in-chief of the Stock Trader’s Almanac, tells PBS’ Nightly Business Report, “The first year of the post-election year, as we call it, has been better under Democrats. We've had some decent gains. Only Carter had a really bad first year and then Republicans have fared much worse with about a 1 or 2 percent average loss for the post-election year since Eisenhower.”

  Overall Avg. since 1953 Post-Election Year
Republicans 8.0% -1.2%
Democrats 9.1% 9.7%
source: Stock Trader's Almanac

If history is any indication, the stock market could make some nice gains this year. At least perhaps they will regain some of the losses they’ve experienced over the past year. Of course, I should point out that past performance is no indication of future returns.

Still, data from Ibbotson Associates in Chicago backs up the Stock Trader’s Almanac. From 1926 through the end of August 2008, the S&P 500 rose 9.2% annually after inflation under Democrats compared to a 4.6% increase under Republicans. And that’s not counting the market’s most recent breakdown.

A 2000 study from two finance professors at UCLA, "The Presidential Puzzle: Political Cycles and the Stock Market,” looked at stock market performance under Democrats and Republicans compared to the performance of safer, three-month Treasury bills. Over the 72-year period from 1927-1999, the S&P 500 yielded an 11 percent return a year on average under Democrats versus three-month Treasury bills. Under Republicans, the S&P 500 returned just 2 percent more than three-month T-bills over the 72-year period.

The study also compared the performance of two portfolios during a Democratic and a Republican administration – a “value-weighted portfolio” that ranks all stocks in the index according to their total market value and an “equal-weighted portfolio” that ranks all the stocks the same.

Democrats prevailed again. On average, the value-weighted portfolio returned 9% more under Democrats than Republicans and the equal-weighted portfolio returned 16% more during Democratic administrations over the 72-year period.

So, while the prevailing assumption on Wall Street is that Republicans – with lower taxes and less regulation – are better for stocks, the data says otherwise. Will these statistics hold true for Barack Obama’s presidency?

Regardless of your personal political affiliations, there is unprecedented opportunity in the stock market right now. As Chris said in his article on Tuesday, our focus at Tycoon is always on helping you make money. Dylan, Chris, Teeka, and Ethan have all pointed out potential stock market winners over the past weeks.

In fact, the three Chinese stocks that Chris mentioned last week are up 30% (CEO), 18% (PTR), and 10.5% (LFC). Five out of the six stocks Teeka mentioned in his article last week are up between 12% (PUW) and 38% (ENER). The lone loser is down just 2.7% (CVA).

Now is the time for you to start plotting your course for more profits. And if history is any guide, we are in for a good year!



(Please let us know what you think about Marie Albin's article.)
Rate his article here »



Marie Albin
Managing Editor
The Tycoon Report




Rate this article
Thank you for your vote!

24 Comments

Post your own comment
  1. RAD (8 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    For an insightful article about confidence, Wall Street, and the election: http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=0c3d27be96c2424f859396a2079ff2e9&siteid=nwhwk&sguid=m7dUkKATlkaynvXTE1onXA

    8]
  2. jester112358 (8 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    History is a nice guide to well "history". Just like charts are an excellent way to see what you should have done in the past. Your whole thesis that there is a causal relationship between a limited set of data and future market behavior is absurd and I pity the fool who follows such advice.



    And why not mention the great call for the US$ to go down a few weeks back? Didn't work out too well did it? Want to understand why? When people sell stocks they buy dollars! That lead to a shortage of dollars as people unwind their positions. How about buying C at $28? Not too good, eh as its now trading a around 11.5. And is probably only worth 6-8/share.



    By the way, CEO was at $70 10 days ago and its trading at $68 now. How is that a 30% gain? Check your math.
  3. Lee (8 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Democrats keep saying that and it's ridiculous. Take Bill Clinton, for example. He was fortunate in taking office at a time when the market was poised to take off. It was the end of the cold war, the end to the savings and loan crisis, when productivity was increasing due to computers. Anyone coming into office at this time was going to do well. We had been in a very slight recession...it had already ended....the GDP was 4.5%...very strong....and gaining. Bill Clinton then promoted and enjoyed two bubbles...the dot.com bubble and the housing bubble. He and Rubin promoted this by forcing banks to make loans to unqualified buyers. This caused a huge housing bubble as everyone could now "afford" a home. Congress went to Republicans in l994..They cut spending, helped end welfare. Huge boom in dot com and housing caused huge revenue gains which made it possible to balance the budget. Of course bubbles are not sustainable...Before Clinton left office, the stock market crashed. Unemployment went up, GDP slowed almost to zero. He came at the perfect time, things were bad when he left...we were in recession months before he left. You have to consider how did they find it? Did they improve things? Or were they beneficiaries of a great economy they did not cause?
  4. John M (8 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Yea, but...



    We can say that on average Dems have had a better first year, but I think the world macro view is probably a better indicator then this marginal statistic. Would I bet on an up market because of this statistic, or would I look at the finance crisis in Europe, the market in China, the empty shopping malls, the decline in car sales, the deficit, and the national debt and conclude that the odds favor down.
  5. DH (8 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    The idea a Democrat won the election is erroneous as traditional Democrat is understood. A Socialist won the election and is accompanied by a majority of Socialists in Democrat clothing. My Grandmother was a Democrat who thankfully she has passed for the behavior of the current group of Democrat pretenders would have caused her to go.



    Could be the markets decline over the past two years and now the even more marked decline in the poast two days is a result of Socialist behavior!
  6. Peter (8 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    For marie, Your assumptions are inane that we live in a free democracy. here ois a little objective reality for you.

    "The American people pretend to live in a Free country, and the rulers in Washington pretend to agree".

    Thomas Jefferson is dead.

    Long live the Reppublic.

    Death to Tyrants and Swindlers.
  7. John M (8 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Its really discouraging how easily manipulated the majority of our public is especially educated democrats, its almost embarrassing, I feel bad for them.



    Hopefully Obama only ran on a spread the wealth platform but hes smart enough to realize these policies wont work. We can already see them going back on significant policies. I will give him the benefit of the doubt.
  8. John M (8 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    WE CAN BLAME OBAMA FOR THINGS THAT HAPPEN NOW. The markets trade on what will happen in the future not based on what is happening today. In the future we have higher taxes and less expansion. So investors are selling to avoid tomorrow. get it. If McCain won the financial mess wouldnt be over but I bet the markets would have been up based on what he would do in the future. All this selling is not solely based on Obama but the selling has without questions been intensified by Obama win. Their is to much uncertainty about his plans and his anti-business, anti-capitalim, pro-distribution, anti-free trade, anti-business, pro-increased government spending, pro0universal health care positions. Of course most of the country loves him because he wants to give then the big bad rich guys money. The nasty rich guy who employs them, feeds them, pays for all their services like garbage, mail, fire department, police force, housing. Poor usually uneducated, so it is hard for them to understand the importance rich people play in their daily lives. Most educated democrats still cant understand. They believe the same beliefs they were taught in elementary school and college. No ability to think for them selves.
  9. Terri (8 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Thankyou for your comment. I have great hope for our new leader., he has alot of work ahead,
  10. John M (8 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    7000 a year sorry bout that.

Add Your Comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed.

Please fill in the missing field(s).

Important: To comment on Tycoon Report articles, you must first log in. If you are a paying customer of Tycoon, you may use the same login and password that you use normally. If you do not yet have a login, please take a moment to register below. It’s free, and you only need to do it once.

Register

(email address and password information will NOT be displayed publicly)

Name *

Email *

Password *

Subscribe to The Tycoon Report
By registering, you agree to our terms of service.

Already a member? Log in!

(you will not be taken away from this page)

Email *

Password *

Remember?

Forgot Password?




Important Notice to all stock spammers, scammers and penny stock pump-and-dumpers: You will get no respect here. Don’t bother submitting fraudulent or misleading information in the guise of an article, because we will remove it. Any piece of content submitted on this site can be removed at the sole discretion of the Tycoon staff.