Digg It |   Del.icio.us |   Printer Friendly |   PDF |   Email

What This Year's Holiday Party Can Teach You About Market Bubbles

Thursday, November 13, 2008 | Dylan Jovine

Rating:

GOSH, I LOVE A GOOD PARTY.

In my 20s I used to live for them. Every Thursday, Friday and Saturday night my friends and I would go club hopping in the City just looking to capture that moment. The one moment that defined all great parties for me:The exact moment in time when the right girl, the right drink and the right song come together not just for you - but for the entire room. The crowd goes wild.

The lifelong study of the psychology of crowds has been a large part of my professional career as an investor. I've always been fascinated by the "ingredients" it takes to affect the way a group of people in a certain setting perceive events.

What I've discovered is that the three key "ingredients" for a great party in my 20s - the Disc Jockey, alcohol and social acceptance - are the same that have been used to create bubbles in all financial markets throughout history.

The only difference is that in a market bubble people don't have to be in the same room together physically to have their perceptions manipulated. They just have to be in the same room together mentally.

Here's how it works:

Perception Altering Ingredient #1: The Disc Jockey. The "Disc Jockey" of the 1929 crash was the mass media at the time: radio and newspapers. The "soundtrack" they were playing is the same one played through all bull markets in history: Get Rich Quick.

Now I'm not saying that it's the media's fault alone. Although many newspaper writers were literally on Wall Street's pump-and-dump payroll, the media tends to reflect the desires of the culture. Like any good DJ, the media plays the songs that people get up and dance to.

Indeed, one of the most popular songs of the year was "Blue Skies Are Here to Stay," a song that reflected America's belief that prosperity had become permanent.

My personal favorite hit that year was  "I'm in the Market for You":
    I'll have to see my broker

    Find out what he can do.

    'Cause I'm in the market for you.

    There won't be any joker,

    With margin I'm all through.

    'Cause I want you outright it's true.

    You're going up, up ,up in my estimation.

    I want a thousand shares of your caresses too.

    We'll count the hugs and kisses,

    When dividends are due,

    'Cause I'm in the market for you.

    (http://bss.sfsu.edu/tygiel/Hist427/427sound/Crashsound/inthemkt.wav)

Perception Altering Ingredient #2: Alcohol. The "alcohol" of all financial bubbles is, has always been and will always be easy money. Like alcohol, easy money is very intoxicating. The more of it you have, the better you feel. The better you feel, the more of it you want to get.

Richard Pryor once said that doing a line of cocaine made him feel like a new man. And the first thing that new man wanted to do was another line of cocaine.

I view easy money the same way. Since it's difficult to earn money under normal circumstances, when easy money starts coming into your wallet the very first thing you want to do is get more of it.

Just like alcohol, the more easy money you make, the more your perception becomes altered. Instead of stopping after you "get a good buzz," you begin to get that invincible feeling that you've got everything under control.

And like all Greek Tragedies, hubris is often a big killer.

Like "I work hard for the money I make - I deserve this new car." Or "We'll pay back the billion dollars we borrow from the bank to take this firm private before you know it." Or "Goldman Sachs (GS) isn't that special. If they could make a gazillion trading their own accounts so can we at Merrill Lynch (MER)."

And that ties in to...

Perception Altering Ingredient #3: Social Acceptance. In my 20s, it was the youthful, silly and completely normal goal of meeting the perfect girl for the perfect night. Looking back now, that form of social acceptance seems almost silly.

But how does it play out as we get older?

I would argue that the pressures of social acceptance are as intense for a 50-year old couple with 2 kids as they are for teenage girls. Much of how we perceive ourselves is based on how we think people perceive us.

And that's just human nature. It always feels good to drive a new expensive car in part because it conveys what in any society is a powerful message - the ability to acquire resources. And those who are best at acquiring resources are usually those who have the most power to determine the "pecking order" of their social group, whether it be in choosing "mates" or "friends."

The trap that most people fall into is that whether they know it or not they "compete" with those in their "peer group" whom they perceive to be most "successful" at acquiring resources. Not only do they compete with them but they actually determine their own worth by judging themselves in relation to them.

Teenage girls want to be skinny because Britney Spears is skinny. Men want to work out because Brad Pitt looks great with his shirt off. My wife and I want a bigger house because our son spends his afternoons playing at the Jones' house and they have a pool, etc.

And in an easy money environment, the competition becomes far more intense as many of our peers begin to acquire excess resources in a much more accelerated fashion than normal.

As with all financial bubbles, the greater the bubble, the easier cheap money becomes available. And the easier it is to get cheap money the faster it is for our peers to acquire resources. And the faster it is for our peers to acquire resources, the more intense the competition for resources becomes and so on.

We all fall victim to it in different ways. The key is to know when the ingredients are at play and to avoid the perception traps the accompany groupthink.



(Please let us know what you think about Dylan Jovine's article.)
Rate his article here »



Dylan Jovine
Chief Investment Officer
The Tycoon Report


Rate this article
Thank you for your vote!

11 Comments

Post your own comment
  1. Sally (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    NIgel, You arae right. Dylan had me with the first two ingredients, but as I come from a family of nonconformists who valued rational decisions and quality more than "keeping up with the Joneses" and peer approval, he lost me with point three. However, I realize that we have been the minority, and only in this economic crisis are more people beginning to see the fallacy of "bigger (more expensive?) is always better". I hope we have reached a turning point.
  2. matan (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Jester- I really must correct you because your comments about markets always being zero-sume games is completely incorrect:



    Options and future contracts are examples of zero-sum games (excluding costs). For every person who gains on a contract, there is a counter-party who loses. Gambling is also an example of a zero-sum game.



    A stock market, however, is not a zero-sum game because wealth can be created in a stock market. Your gain is not neccessarily anothers loss and is definitely not a zero net change in wealth.



    A zero-sume game means the net change in total wealth among participants is zero.
  3. AZ (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    yo
  4. Dylan (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    THANK YOU SO MUCH JESSICA!



    There's an old expression: "To the man with the hammer everything looks like a nail."



    Every time I hear jester comment that's what comes to my mind.



    --DYLAN JOVINE
  5. jessica (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    But jester... I'm pretty sure these guys have already made their money in the market. In fact, I suspect that Dylan and the like (who do NOT own paid products... remember - This is FREE) continue to make their money in the market, even while **GASP** helping others do the same.



    Get a clue, man. Some people are genuinely interested in helping others.
  6. Nigel (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Dylan includes in his article:



    "And that's just human nature. It always feels good to drive a new expensive car in part because it conveys what in any society is a powerful message - the ability to acquire resources."



    Sorry, Dylan, I have to disagree with you. Your absolutist phraseology is not only incorrect, it's passe and dangerous.



    "It always feels good to drive a new expensive car" - not in my book, and not in the books of an increasing number of friends. What's starting to feel good is the understanding that we can do just as well, and can often be a lot more satisfied, with less rather than more. "Bigger" is no longer better. "More" is no longer to be sought after. "Enough" is the new buzzword, and the sooner society as a whole realises this, the faster we'll be on the road to fixing this disastrous economic uncertainty, into which we got ourselves precisely because of the "bigger" and "more" chasing of so many people.
  7. jester112358 (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    The thing to remember is that in any transaction in any market, up down, or sideways, there is a winner and a loser. Its a zero sum game. So the question each individual must ask, what makes me so special that I think I can only profit while other lose? What do I know that others don't? If you don't have that edge and most don't, why are you in any market at any time?



    And take this thought experiment one step further, why would anyone who knew enough to have an edge, say a newsletter writer who makes his living, not by trading, but by giving advice, want to help you by giving away his edge? The answer: a steady income from subscription fees sure beats gambling. QED
  8. Brian (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Thank you Dylan for providing your readers with a clever way of comprehending the indiscernable.
  9. KLong (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    All the more reason to ignore the market completely and just trade the charts. A purely mechanical approach may not be perfect, but it certainly does remove the emotion. And over the long haul mechanical trading usualy beats discresionary trading.
  10. Jim (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Dylan,



    Very insightful. You are wise beyond your years. Like most people, I wish I knew 25 years ago what I know now.



    Keep up the good work!

Add Your Comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed.

Please fill in the missing field(s).

Important: To comment on Tycoon Report articles, you must first log in. If you are a paying customer of Tycoon, you may use the same login and password that you use normally. If you do not yet have a login, please take a moment to register below. It’s free, and you only need to do it once.

Register

(email address and password information will NOT be displayed publicly)

Name *

Email *

Password *

Subscribe to The Tycoon Report
By registering, you agree to our terms of service.

Already a member? Log in!

(you will not be taken away from this page)

Email *

Password *

Remember?

Forgot Password?




Important Notice to all stock spammers, scammers and penny stock pump-and-dumpers: You will get no respect here. Don’t bother submitting fraudulent or misleading information in the guise of an article, because we will remove it. Any piece of content submitted on this site can be removed at the sole discretion of the Tycoon staff.