Digg It |   Del.icio.us |   Printer Friendly |   PDF |   Email

Should Investing Courses Be Mandatory In High Schools?

Sunday, August 26, 2007 | Ethan Roberts (fuss1) Is this Spam?

Rating:

When I was growing up, we had High School courses like English, Math, Social Studies,and Science. There were no classes on Economics, nor Business, nor Investments. My parents taught me the importance of savings, but never about "investing" in stocks or real estate or commodities. That was for rich people only. We used to laugh at the pictures of the Real Estate Tycoons on the Monopoly board.

We had Christmas clubs, and used to get our savings passbook stamped at the bank each time we put in a few bucks, courtesy of Uncle Davey or Aunt Irene. Money that wasn't saved usually went towards baseball cards- but those were the days when you "flipped" the cards against the wall, well before the days when you put them into $2 plastic holders and sold them on Ebay.

I saw a debate the other day on CNBC between Robert Reich, the former Labor Secretary, and Steve Moore, of the Wall Street Journal. The subject was "should there be mandatory meetings with credit counselors for people taking out mortgage loans". Reich argued that it was a good idea, and would only take an hour of the applicant's time, while Moore said we are creating a "nanny state" by mandating meetings like that. Moore added that it was Congress and the Feds who urged banks to make loans to low income persons, and asked increduously "why didn't they (the borrowers) read the contract?"

I thought about both sides for awhile, and came to the conclusion that people don't read the contracts because they don't truly understand finances and investments, but they are too embarrassed to admit it. So they just sign, putting their trust and faith in the banks who are advising them. And as we have seen, this has now led to huge problems in the housing market.

Financial illiteracy is rampant in American society. Many people have difficulty balancing a check book or doing simple budgeting. Credit card balances are through the roof, and Americans are saving less than any time since the depression. Many people have 401k programs through work, but have no idea what they're even investing in each month. The lessons of Enron and World Com have now taught us to diversify, but not until thousands of people had already lost their life savings.

Although economics and finances are taught in College curriculums, there are still a large number of people who either don't go to college, or who go but do not take these courses. While one can learn all about investing from independent reading, this is not the norm for most people.

So in my mind, the answer lies in teaching mandatory programs of Economics, Finances, and Investing at the high school level. Schools already teach life skills such as Drivers Ed and Computers, and these are additional areas that are just as important.

Perhaps if people learned more about budeting, staying out of debt, and investing, there would be far less need for the high risk mortgage loans, such as interest only, ARM's, or no money down. And those who still choose to take alternative loans will at least understand better what they are getting into. Why wait until you are signing for a mortgage to learn the lessons you could be learning years earlier?

I think Mr. Reich is correct. A one hour, mandatory course is not too much to ask of a person who is applying for any type of non- conventional financing. But the requirement should come from the banks, not from the Federal Government. I think if banks are going to lend money in non-traditional ways, they should have the right to make sure the borrower understands what they are taking on. The responsibility needs to be shared between lender and borrower. Recent attempts to portray one as the lamb and the other as the wolf are simply narrow sighted and skewed.

Since so few parents have the time nor the knowledge to teach their children the financial fundamentals of life, we simply had better leave it to the High Schools to provide the skills that all of us so desparately need. If we continue to send young people out into the world with no financial skills, and then tell them "go invest in Real Estate, stocks, and other financial instruments", then we will continue to endure melt downs like the recent one which may yet cripple financial institutions and markets around the world.



Rate this article
Thank you for your vote!

4 Comments

Post your own comment
  • Most recent
  • 1
  • Oldest
  1. Ken L (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    I think Moore just supports the staus quo, and his buddies who already know this stuff and profit off the knowledge.



    I definately think this kind of information should be more available at a grade school level, outside of regular business courses, and mandatory for any one planning to take on debt. At the very least people should be required to acknowledge that they understand the risks involved, kind of like opening an options trading account.



    Ken
  2. Ben S (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Ethan - Nicely argued. I would guess, however, that home buyers not reading the fine print has less to do with their lack of financial knowledge, and more to do with the sheer volume of paperwork that you've gotta fill out, sign, initial, notarize, etc. during the process. I still have nightmares about the stack of paperwork we had to go through when buying our last house. A high school course is a good idea, but I also think it's something that college econ courses should incorporate. I took a lot of economics in college - everything from micro to macro to international econ - and not one of my professors ever thought to relate what they were teaching to an individual investment decision.
  3. chaos_nantuko (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    The problem with making it a mandatory high school course is that entering high school, there is a very wide range of knowledge when it comes to the topic. Unlike in math, science, or even to a large extrent english, where everyone is around the same level when they enter high school, the expertise of people in a business class varies widely. For those who are completely clueless, it could easily take a whole semester just learning the bare minimum. Yet those who have any experiance with business could understand all this within 2 weeks, and the other 4 months becomes a waste of time. To get those who were completely clueless to the point where they can be considered "financially literate" would take at least 2 courses (which would have to be compulsary, because the first course is composed of very dry material, and the second one is of the utmost importance). Yet forcing all students to take extremely basic investing courses for 2 years is unreasonable, because some of these students are already financially literate, and will learn almost nothing even after putting almost 200 hours into it.

    I agree that everyone should know this stuff, so as i see it, the solution is to start teaching it in grade 6. By then, they have the mathamatical ability to deal with it, yet its new enough that your not wasting anybodys time. Also, it means that by the time they leave high school, investing would seem seem natural to them.
  4. Joseph C (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    I wish I could give this 4.5 out of 5 stars. The only thing I think you didn't cover was the fact that some people don't want to learn about this sort of thing, just like they don't want to learn about math or English, etc.

    I had an economics class in high school, and we covered balancing a check book and rudimentary stock investing. I am fortunate that my father, a CPA, taught me a lot about finances. I wish that I had been able to learn more in school.

    In a sense, I think you may be preaching to the choir here. :) We're here because we want to learn more about finances. It would be great to teach at least the basics to those who don't share the desire to learn more, and I'm especially glad that there are places like The Tycoon Report available for those who are willing to put forth some effort to learn more.

    Great work! Keep 'em coming!
  • Most recent
  • 1
  • Oldest

Add Your Comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed.

Please fill in the missing field(s).

Important: To comment on Tycoon Report articles, you must first log in. If you are a paying customer of Tycoon, you may use the same login and password that you use normally. If you do not yet have a login, please take a moment to register below. It’s free, and you only need to do it once.

Register

(email address and password information will NOT be displayed publicly)

Name *

Email *

Password *

Subscribe to The Tycoon Report
By registering, you agree to our terms of service.

Already a member? Log in!

(you will not be taken away from this page)

Email *

Password *

Remember?

Forgot Password?




Important Notice to all stock spammers, scammers and penny stock pump-and-dumpers: You will get no respect here. Don’t bother submitting fraudulent or misleading information in the guise of an article, because we will remove it. Any piece of content submitted on this site can be removed at the sole discretion of the Tycoon staff.