Digg It |   Del.icio.us |   Printer Friendly |   PDF |   Email

How to Rob an Individual Investor

Wednesday, June 27, 2007 | Dylan Jovine

Rating:
THE RICH HAVE BEEN DOING IT TO THE POOR SINCE THE BEGINNING OF TIME.

Fortunately for us, it’s a heck of a lot more blatant (and therefore easier to spot) on Wall Street than it is in many places.

Some call it a “hustle”.  Others call it a “con job”.  Whatever your pet name for it is, one thing is certain: if you don’t see it coming, you’ll likely wind up much poorer as a result and very, very sorry you ever ran into it.

On Wall Street, as opposed to Main Street, the con takes a couple of different shapes.  One is the famous and well discussed “bucket-shop hustle”.

Now, many people automatically think of small, dingy firms – akin to a boiler room – when they hear the name “bucket-shop”.  But those firms are responsible for a small fraction of the damage done to individual investors.  To this very day, the most harmful “bucket-shop” practices are engaged in by many of the largest brokerage firms in the world.

It goes a little something like this: you get a call from a well-intentioned broker who has the “deal of a lifetime” for you.  After getting you all worked up into a lather, you’re convinced that it’s something you should purchase.  What you don’t know is that the broker who just convinced you to buy shares of XYZ was secretly selling them for one of the firm's largest customers.  Before you know it, you’re left holding shares of a stock or bond that have decreased in value by as much as 90%.

Although these kinds of shenanigans continue to this very day, the last really blatant example was during the height of the dot com crash in the late 1990s.

The “commission cartwheel” is another variation of the same hustle.  The only thing that changes is that, instead of asking you to buy a stock that somebody else is selling, you’re asked to purchase shares in a stock that gives the salesman an extraordinarily large commission.

What’s particularly damaging about this little hustle is that it comes in forms that most people couldn’t imagine.

Sure, some folks expect to get hustled when buying shares of a stock.  But oftentimes, people practicing the “commission cartwheel” hide their hustle behind otherwise innocent sounding securities such as bonds and mutual funds.  Yikes!

And of course, let’s not forget the traditional classic, the “pump and dump”.  In its older incarnations, investors get called to buy a stock that is secretly being liquidated by the owners of the firms (as opposed to large clients of the firm).

For example, you get a call to own shares of XYZ for $2 per share.  What you don’t know is that the firm calling you had an investment banking relationship with the company and is selling the shares allotted to them at sometimes pennies per share.  So every time you purchase 1,000 shares of stock, you are really making the firm an “investment banking” profit of $1,998 if the bank owns the shares at $0.02 each.

These days, the classic “pump and dump” has taken on a new and much hipper flavor with the use of email.  This new and improved “electronic pump and dump” does largely the same thing, but via email instead of phone calls.

I can’t tell you how many friends of mine – largely smart and successful people – shoot me the occasional email asking my opinion on a stock they’ve just been given the greatest tip about.

I don’t even respond any longer if the symbol ends in the letters “.PK” denoting a pink sheet security.  If they don’t know to beware of those types of advertisements at this point (after years and years of my warnings), then nothing I can say will change that.

Last but not least, there is another classic Wall Street hustle that I’ve failed to mention so far.  Of all the hustles I’ve discussed, it is by far the sleekest and smoothest.  In fact, it’s such a smooth and silky hustle that it isn’t even illegal!  But make no mistake about it – it’s just as dangerous (if not more so) than the rest of them.

We’ll refer to it as the “IPO – Icicle” and it goes a little something like this:

When a specific industry group has a great run – say 5 or 10 years of excellent business conditions – the founders plan to sell their stock at the very top of the market.

For example, right now – for the first time in history – private equity firms of all stripes are planning to go public.  This is largely a result of the success (or the illusion thereof) of Blackstone’s recent IPO.

Why on earth would these otherwise greedy private equity mavens want to suddenly sell shares to the investing public?  Is it that they’ve grown a conscience and want small investors across America to make some great money owning their shares?

Of course not!

What they’re saying to themselves is that we’re at the top of a bubble in private equity.  With low interest rates, a business-friendly administration and a low tax environment, things are simply never going to get this good ever again.

So they’re cashing out now.  Right at the peak of the private equity bubble, when small investors who don’t understand the cyclical nature of things are at their most fascinated by the billions of dollars they’re making.

This is by far the most dangerous of all hustles because it comes gift-wrapped by some of the biggest names in business whom you read about each day in The Wall Street Journal (Steve Schwarzman from Blackstone, Henry Kravis from KKR) and seems perfectly legitimate.  And on the surface, it is; it’s not like they’ve planned a criminal enterprise with you as the victim.

But that’s just what makes it so darn dangerous.  They know that you’re buying their stock from them at the top of a bubble.  And yes, they’re definitely taking advantage of that.  But that’s really what Wall Street is all about, isn’t it: smart investors taking advantage of less informed investors?

So consider this as fulfilling my job to inform you.  Indeed, folks, trust me on this: you want to avoid these private equity firms like the plague right now. 

I’m not saying they're not fundamentally good businesses. 

What I’m saying is that buying shares in these companies now would be like buying into the Florida real estate market a year or so ago: a bad idea, by any stretch of the imagination.

For those of you sitting around right now in the middle of summer looking for things to buy, beware.

Mark my words when I say the private equity firms aren’t the profit pond you want to be fishing in.

(Please let us know what you think about Dylan Jovine's article.)
Rate his article here »



Dylan Jovine
Chief Investment Officer
The Tycoon Report


Rate this article
Thank you for your vote!

51 Comments

Post your own comment
  1. mark (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    I was ask to invest in a company call Trimersion for $10.000. It is a new company not on the stock market. It is surpose to be a up and comming and wil pay you about %30 in a quater. It will grow as time goes on the sale man says. He has sent me some info and faxes from the CEO. It sounds too good to be true. Has any one else been called buy this Company. What do you think of this?? It has a web site I would like any bodys take on this. It is part of 3001ad and it has a wed too. It is in video games. Has any one heard of them.



    Mark
  2. Dana (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Thank you so much. It is unusual and so needed to have someone actually give protective advice to the small player!
  3. Jim C (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Great article and we all know that they will never be able to rid the market of all the crooks out there.Does help the small invester to have someone like you to point some of the crooks out to us.Thanks a bunch
  4. Peter (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Dylan,



    I agree, and thank you for being the "bigger man".



    One quick correction on your last note (and maybe it was a Freudian slip) - Blackstone, not Blackrock.



    As for submitting an article - I would have to do it anonymously as I am not licensed in all states, and for me and my position, the internet is therefore out of my jurisdiction. If I could keep it anonymous I just may.



    Regards,

    Peter
  5. Dylan (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Ok Peter, I think it's fair to call a stalemate. You have to understand that I'm not just picking on brokers just to pick on them. I've worked on Wall Street as a broker myself! I TOTALLY appreciate what it takes to do the job and be a good broker. And of course, I know that most people who do it have good intentions.

    (The major theme of the article was about buying companies like Blackrock anyway).

    SUBMIT AN ARTICLE ON HOW TO PICK A GOOD BROKER

    I would like to invite you to submit an article on the top 5 or 10 things an investor needs to do to find a good broker (Use the "Submit An Article" button).

    You could really use your experience to guide people to the right financial advisers which would benefit everybody.

    (It's also a great potential way for you to get leads, if people want to contact you directly via email or something).

    Anyway, I do wish you the best and I hope you keep reading!

    Cheers & Have a Good 4th of July!

    --DYLAN
  6. Peter (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Dylan,



    I see that you felt it necessary to provide feedback on my comment. Thank you, I will take that as a compliment.



    My point is exactly this. The large brokerages that you refer to in your statement, and let me quote you for accuracy:



    "To this very day, the most harmful “bucket-shop” practices are engaged in by many of the largest brokerage firms in the world."



    Here is the practice that you suggest is practiced frequently enough to warrant your column warning the common investor. Again, your words:



    "It goes a little something like this: you get a call from a well-intentioned broker who has the “deal of a lifetime” for you. After getting you all worked up into a lather, you’re convinced that it’s something you should purchase. What you don’t know is that the broker who just convinced you to buy shares of XYZ was secretly selling them for one of the firm's largest customers. Before you know it, you’re left holding shares of a stock or bond that have decreased in value by as much as 90%"





    This does not happen. Our firm does not suggest stock or mutual funds in any favorable way. Knowing this, I have colleagues at many of the other top firms. What you refer to does not exist in the large wirehouses as you say it does.





    In response to your personal note: Naive? No. There is a lot that can happen on Wall Street, however, our entire firm is aligned in such a way to be either a Broker or Dealer to any one customer, not both. We report on a consistent basis to regulators. They aid in the oversight of the ongoing design of our trading systems to digital and paper file storage.



    Do you?



    As far as are there bad brokers? Sure. Are there misleading columnists and/or "internet investment research authors"? I would say there are more.



    Playing to the fears of the common investor? Are your solutions comprehensive? Are your stock picks diversified? Do you advise that your subcribers who have less money not put all there $$ on any one of your picks?



    I am sure you do your best. So do a great majority of Financial Advisors employed by large wirehouses. Most of us have retained our CFP, or other respected credential, and continually work to better our value to clients.



    Also, most of us would not have the time to read your article, nor care to respond to it. You just struck a nerve.





    Peter
  7. jhc1122 (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    You hit a "bulls eye" this time! I've been trying to tell my Mom this for so long - all of my attempts to get her to move her money (she doesn't have a lot, but none the less) from her commission brokerage account to an online account has failed. I intend to show her this article. I've been reading the Tycoon Report for some time now, and I can always count on you guys to be "honest" and upfront. Thanks much!
  8. Harry G (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Dylan, you really said a mouthful. I read your comments to my wife, who has over #2,000,000.00 with a large financial entity. The same thing happened to her for 4 yrs. Until, I took over her account and transfered half a mil. to a onling account. Making all kinds of returns. We haven't bought or sold anything from her broker in two years. I can't THANK YOU ENOUGH. HP.
  9. jim1wolverine (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    This was a very eye opening report to the new

    invester Thank you

    Jim1wolverine|aol.com
  10. Dylan (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Peter:

    you sound as if it is you and other honest brokers who I am calling "guilty" of dishonest practices.

    What, do you think you represent all "legit" brokers in America? Do you think that the article was written by somebody who is so narrow minded that he doesn't think that most brokers really do care about their clients?

    My point is that by you saying the article is "ludicrous" you are essentially saying that these scams I highlighted don't exist.

    Are you that naive? Are you actually saying that there aren't bad brokers and they don't scam customers?

    If so, I truly feel very sorry for your customers...

    DYLAN

Add Your Comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed.

Please fill in the missing field(s).

Important: To comment on Tycoon Report articles, you must first log in. If you are a paying customer of Tycoon, you may use the same login and password that you use normally. If you do not yet have a login, please take a moment to register below. It’s free, and you only need to do it once.

Register

(email address and password information will NOT be displayed publicly)

Name *

Email *

Password *

Subscribe to The Tycoon Report
By registering, you agree to our terms of service.

Already a member? Log in!

(you will not be taken away from this page)

Email *

Password *

Remember?

Forgot Password?




Important Notice to all stock spammers, scammers and penny stock pump-and-dumpers: You will get no respect here. Don’t bother submitting fraudulent or misleading information in the guise of an article, because we will remove it. Any piece of content submitted on this site can be removed at the sole discretion of the Tycoon staff.