Digg It |   Del.icio.us |   Printer Friendly |   PDF |   Email

Why Rising Education Cost May NOT be The Future

Tuesday, August 12, 2008 | Chris Rowe

Rating:
I just came back from lunch.  I met with a family of 6 from Chile that have been members of The Trend Rider, Point and Profit, the Internal Strength System and ETF Master Trader for a long time.

My article today is about why this family sets a great example for families around the world.  Specifically, I'm talking about their stance on their children's education (not to mention their own).  I was truly blown away and when I find something that I think most Tycoon readers can benefit from, I write about it.  Hopefully I can multiply their good fortune by a hundred thousand today.  And please leave comments on the subject if you have them. 

First let me start by setting the stage -

We are talking about a family of six (lovely couple with 4 children).  I almost never meet privately with members of our programs simply because my schedule is always slammed.  So to be honest, after agreeing to meet with them I started regretting the decision as the day was approaching, especially after I envisioned sitting at an awkward stiff lunch conversating superficially with the Brady Bunch. 


But from the time I shook hands and made eye contact with each of them I knew I was in for a relaxed and fun time.

Immediately we start talking about most societies' conventional educational process verses home schooling.  This was a family that believes in home schooling their children.  They were actually going to an entrepenure's seminar in Georgia - and they were going mainly for their kids!

My thinking on the subject of home schooling starts with three basic points:


1. Most people would label home schooling as a bad idea because it might be more difficult to get a job in the "real world" without a formal degree of some kind, and because it may rob the kid of the social environment that comes with school.

But when you think of home-schooling, keep an open mind for a second.  Don't just think about the cliche; parents standing over their kids and trying to force them to think the way they do in a very strict manner, or the ones who keep their kids in a bubble and talk about how evil the outside world is.  If you met this family, those images would shatter right away.


2. Traditional schooling leaves out so much.  This happens on many levels. 

For instance, schools in the U.S. tend to teach history from the United States' point of view.  They tell the stories of World Wars 1 and 2 as seen in the eyes of the United States.  The list goes on, but I'll stop at that example.  The point is there are always many different views of history, and it makes sense to understand things from more than one point of view. 

Something else traditional schooling tends to be seriously lacking on is financial education.  This doesn't mean we have to teach our kids how to trade stock options.  But managing money once you've made it is clearly something that 99% of people don't have a good understanding of. 

For instance, the way your credit score impacts your life.  It's the difference between being able to get a loan at a good interest rate, or even at all.  Traditional schooling at the basic level surely doesn't educate kids on the impact of compounding returns.  If you start with $10,000.00, and make 7% over 30 years, you end up with $76,112.  Some would think that if you make 14% in the same time frame you'd end up with twice as much, but the reality is you'd end up with $509,501.00.

Also, if you're someone in debt, you often find yourself on the wrong side of the "compounding interest" lesson.

3. While I constantly hear people talking about how expensive education is going to be in the next 10 years (the cost is already increasing fast), I wonder if people will begin to take a different view of how to educate their kids.  I know my kids will certainly acquire an education you won't find in schools today.

Think about this for a minute:

When we talk about how expensive education is going to be in the future, we're thinking the education system as we (people currently age 30 or over) have known it.   They now have a tool for education that we didn't have growing up called the "in-ter-net".  Instead of learning the Dewey Decimal system so they can figure out what shelf a book is on at the library so they can look up information, they can go to a website called "Goo-gle".  You've probably heard of it.

In a world where you can type a word, words or a phrase in a box and get the most relevant information found on the WORLD WIDE web, education is 1,000 times more fun.  Therefore, people digest the information much better and they learn much much faster.  So the difference is obviously navigating your own path verses structure that you'd find in a school.  Two positives about traditional schooling is structure, and being well rounded because you're forced to learn about certain subjects in order to get the degree you want.

But the structure found in school can be helpful or harmful, depending on the person, and the same is true on the flip side.  Different people need different options and until recently there have been few options available. 

In the "olden days" we were also interested in educating ourselves, but it was like sitting at a restaurant that has a very small menu of food that not everyone found appealing. 

In such an early stage of the information age it's hard to imagine, but my question is:  What will a world look like after 20 more years of having accessible, personally targeted, education available to you in the comfort of your home? 

What will the cost of education really be?  I ask because when we talk about the increased cost of education, we're considering the current, traditional education systems we have in place today around the world.  It's hard to imagine because the world with the internet - in the grand scheme of things - is still a very new concept, but my feeling is the change in the way many of us educate our children and ourselves is going to be enormous. 

Let's change the term from "home-schooling" to "independent schooling" for a second because, with the internet in our lives, home schooling should be viewed much differently than before.  And let's remember that independent schooling can vary from being very structured to a total free-for-all.

When I went to high school, there was so much "useless garbage" that I had zero interest in learning.  So I didn't.  I just passed the class (and not by much) just so I could advance to the next grade.  The subjects I did have interest in got my attention, but at the school's pace and not my own.  In some cases I wanted to move faster and others slower.  In both cases, it made it a bit more boring.   Does this sound familiar? Can anyone agree with me here? 

Now I am NOT knocking traditional forms of schooling and I'm not saying independent education is for everyone.   But imagine if all the time I spent in school that I felt was a waste, was spent learning about things I had tons of interest in.  Maybe the rule with "independent schooling" should be that the student must focus on at least one or two topics that could turn into a profitable career path.  But the fact is if you love what you do, you can be great at anything.  Maybe the world would be much more productive if it were a world of people that were incredibly good at their craft instead of one where people are well rounded and don't do their jobs well.

"Independent schooling" is not the norm, but this allows the freedom to learn what you want and you'd learn it at a much faster pace.  If you give them enough freedom, at some point they will find what they should find to be well rounded.  And let's consider that being too well rounded may not be a good thing.  Maybe it's like over-diversifying your stock portfolio.  I guess it all comes down to structuring your life so that you experience as much happiness as possible.

Finally, I want to tell you that this family of 6 was very intelligent, down to earth, and fun to talk to.  And that means a lot coming from someone from New York city who has had tons of exposure to all kinds of people in his life. 

The 20 year old daughter impressed the heck out of me.  Wow.  What was so cool about her was how sharp she was and what was beautiful about her (in such a classy way) was her confidence.  The reason I bring that up is it contradicted what I imagine many might be quick label a person who was independently educated.  If you spoke with her, you would see that not only are the parents doing a great job, but that self education seems to work very well.  She was clearly much brighter than your average person in many ways.

I think the key here is the parents commitment.  Here we have two parents that are traveling to another country taking their 4 kids to an entrepenurial seminar.  They go to many educational programs and purchase educational products.  These are highly motivated people, and they are focused on giving their kids enough freedom to make the right decision, but they are doing so while balancing that with the right amount of guidance. 

As we were walking back to their car we were talking.    I asked if home schooling appeared to be a growing trend in Chile.  The father said he didn't think so.  Hardly anyone does it - much like in the U.S. - and he said the reviews he got were that parents didn't want to take "the risk" of home-schooling. 

Doing something that goes against what everyone is trained to believe can be scary.  But don't misconstrue that with risk.  Be brave.  There is a risk in anything that you do.  It's risky to send your kids to school and hope they take care of everything.  Not checking to see what level your kids are operating at - that's risky. Not talking your kids about touchy subjects and hoping they learn for themselves - that's risky.  I would even say that restricting your kids too much is risky.  (Remember the kids when you were growing up that were over-sheltered?  They usually ended up swaying way to the other side the first chance they had.)

No family is perfect.  Every family has problems, from spousal relationships to siblings and parent-child relationships.  As a parent, keeping the right balance between staying involved, and allowing the freedom to chose the right path is key to your child's intellectual as well as their social development. 


(Please let us know what you think about Chris Rowe's article.)
Rate his article here »

“Profit from the Trend”

Chris Rowe
Chief Investment Officer
The Trend Rider




Rate this article
Thank you for your vote!

18 Comments

Post your own comment
  1. Inma (15 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Thx for the article my love. Te quiero. >*< (triple Hug).

    Now,

    the 'Home Schooling' issue has been around for more than three decades already. And it sounds great to me, with certain aspects to take care of, of course. Most of hippy parents in Calif. and Colorado went ahead with that option as education for their kids, and there's clear evidence that the results were positive....what else...in Spain (or let me give you another country as an example, so it's not always same old with MI país...) or countries that have had serious socio-political conflicts recenlty throughout the XXth century, (ie. old Yugoslavia) have had the 'Home Schooling' model implemented, not just as an option in their educational system, a trend as it is for North Americans, but as the only way schooling could be provided. Rural Families in these countries had the only option of education for their children at home. And did it work? In some cases it did, oh hell yeah! In some it didn't. Fate plays a crucial role in these cases as well. I agree official education is wrong in many ways and there's so much more that could be done, though no time is wasted when a child is at an early stage of education. Home schooling has the advantage of focussing on acquiring knowledge but it leaves behind the social and interactional development of the child with other individuals of their age, and that's also part of the learning/acquisition process. Unfortunately, part of present day middle class, Western families' problems is the lack of time to spend with their children, even after school...with this I don't mean a parent needs to stay home to educate the child, but it implies a closer supervision, organization and planning form a parent's perspective. Apart from that, the cost (and the trust) of a private educator at home can definitely be another challenge.

    When the author of this article mentions he learned many things he didn't like or were useless when attending High School, I could only take it as mere infantile comment on his behalf, and an argument proper of a teenager and not as an__________, since kids that age feel less motivated about learning and have no capacity to determine what is good or not good to learn.

    Then he 'innovates' :)) the term of 'Home Schooling' with a clever noun switch 'Independent'= 'Independent Schooling', and he defines it as a nouveau trend of learning at home with the presence of the Internet. WOW. Impressive. New technologies are definitely a crucial part of learning in our times, but it's a tool not an educational pattern. It could be in the future but it isn't yet, we are still very far from it. Besides, it will always require the backup of an educator. Thus, his arguments sound to me, again, blande and unfundamented.

    Later on he talks about money. Ideally education should be free for every human being as it should be healthcare and if we get radically rights oriented, a home and a job. But reality is different. If we pay thousands for our house to be built we should consider our education of the same importance. We are building the inner side, the abstaction of a person as an individual for the future, the construction of a potential self sufficient, competent, happy adult who is capable of managing the life he/she has been given. Why is that not worth our money? Why are there things in our daily life that we accept to pay high prices for and others not? I'm sorry but if we live in this system, this is it. Education should be payed for. The issue is what happens with those who can't afford it. It is there where we should be active. And there are ways, many ways. If I tell them now here, I would never end.

    Now, my knowledge is more oriented to Higher Education, which is optional. (And it shouldn't be). Colleges and Universities should and are already supervising their educational system, because it's a need. It is clear that a person should not attend to an institution to only become an Academic, but to be part of this world, and this world is not just books and bibliography and quotes and scholars and theories. The encrypted system should be opened up to pragmatism, alternative thinking, multidisciplinary strategies and knowledge, like the world and life itself is. It's all a question of ego that's coming to an end. And it will succeed, you'll see. (or die...).

    Therefore I can only disagree with this guy's arguments and I think he should go on with his Chief Officer duty. But you know what..? I'm glad education is STILL a topic, even for guys like this, and I'm so glad you amused my morning!

    I love you so much :*

    Bebé.
  2. todd (15 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Chris - as usual, your wisdom is awesome !! Not only in the financial world, but, regarding these subjects also... thx so much !!! Todd
  3. Dale (15 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    The bottom line, the patents are responsible for their children. We do have different "flavors" to go about educating them. We happen to use home and public schooling. My wife recently started helping in grades 1-3 and I am at times flabbergasted how far off our state education has become. I am glad we got our kids through but am somewhat fearful for the next generation.
  4. john (15 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    the one thing that i have seen that school at any level no longer teaches is thinking. the teach how to memorize the books all they know is what is in the book. if something comes up that was not in their book they don't know and have no idea how to figure it out. i currently live next to two universities and i am starting to believe that if you go there your IQ will drop. some of the high school dropouts appear smarter just because they have learned to think for themselves.

    i am one of those who got into trouble in school because long before the lesson was over i was bored with it and needed to move on. but class has to move at the pace of the slowest student. how many students get punished in public school just because the learn too fast?
  5. Chris (15 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    CHRIS ROWE HERE*******

    Ron,

    Not saying U.S. shouldn't teach U.S. point of view. Just saying all schools in all countries (in my version of a perfect world) would also at minimum touch on other countries' point of view. If you read "The Post-American World" by Fareed Zakaria (or most of what he writes) you would see how he gives points of view of may other countries and cultures. It helps Americans understand things more from a global perspective.

    And to take my point further, this is just one book and I enjoyed it so I breezed through it over a weekend. I think it wouldn't be asking much to ask the traditional school system to inject things like that at least at a minimal level. Or maybe traditional schooling should focus a bit more on getting students to venture out more to open minds of peers.

    The idea is to not just accept what one point of view says. The idea is to question what you learn. It's at minimum a good exercise. The idea is to learn a few different points of view, and to take something from each point of view and draw your own conclusions.

    This is a new world. This is a global world. The sooner people grasp that concept, the better, because the longer people take to grasp it, the further behind they will drop.

    In this world, it pays more to understand other cultures than it has in the past. And this shouldn't be looked at as MORE work. This should be embraced. To me it's inspiring and motivating. We are in a truly exciting time when everyone has a voice - not just the developed countries like the U.S.

    So again, this is not anti-American thinking. People would be more well rounded if they understood the way people outside of their world or country think about things. I think it pays to consider that there is more than one way to think about something.



    Chris
  6. Mike (15 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    We homeschooled our three kids and they turned out to be very well adjusted socially. WE did this not because we are anti social or anything, but because we felt it was best for our kids. They all handle money real well and aced all state required tests. They have never had problems getting jobs and have been good dependable workers for their employers. Three good solid citizens at no cost to the U.S. taxpayer.
  7. RAD (15 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Excellent work, Chris.



    Although I feel I had a great public school education, I'm not convinced today's schools have learning in mind. The No Child Left Behind Act has created this monster: a school system where test results are more important than the proper education of the students.



    I have good friends who have home-schooled their three children. These kids have never acted out (I'm not kidding. It helps that both parents are brilliant therapists). And each of them has been free to pursue whatever it is that tickles their fancy. The oldest daughter was admitted to Brown University and just got back from studying abroad for a year (in Florence - yeesh, am I jealous!) The middle son taught himself the bass guitar and is amazing. Not only that, he's halfway through translating Ovid's "Metamorphoses" from the Latin. The youngest daughter has a flair for fashion and the theatre. These kids know no bounds.



    I applaud their parents for taking the time, in spite of their quite full work schedules, to give their kids what they need.
  8. G. (15 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    I know a family that home-schooled their 2 boys. They made the decision after trying to find a decent education in the public and private sector, and just were not satisfied.

    The mother had no special skills in home schooling, but she and her husband loved and cared for their boys, and wanted the best for them.

    Just like most of us.

    The result?

    The elder boy started college at 14, and graduated from Oxford (yes, the one in England) with his Ph.D. at 21.

    The younger boy is still in college; he'll graduate with his Ph.D. at a similar age. Currently he's ranked in the top 10 EE's in the NATION. Not his class, but in the USA.

    Special boys and parents? No. Just responsible parents who love their kids and raised them properly.

    The parents made the necessary changes in their lifestyle to accommodate home schooling (1 working parent) so their kids could succeed.

    The parents are naturally proud of their kids.

    By the way, both kids got a full free ride, so their higher education was free.

    How much $$ do you need to SAVE to afford 2 Ph.D.'s for 2 kids? It's well over $100K in savings, what to speak of earnings, per child.
  9. Lisa (15 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Great education is too precious to left to other people. We did not home school our four as we felt somewhat unqualified, but encouraged lively discussions, open critiques of what and how they were learning, and challenged them (and they also challenged us) to go further and broader than what they got in school. By making learning a priority, we have four adults who will never loose their curiosity or love for learning.
  10. Lin H (15 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Chris, comparing to the US education system, the Asian education system is even worse. In China, Japan, Singapore, and etc. People studies mainly for passing exams. Most of the parents are only looking at marks to evaluate their kid. Some parents even beat the kid is the kid did not meet their expectation.

    So based on the exam focused education system, the financial education would be even more difficult to be implemented. Although parents may be financial minded, but not many parents will teach their kids. Such as in China, many parents will form an image to the kids that as long as you do your exam well, don't care about other things.

    Therefore, relatively US education system is much better. However, no perfect system. There are lot more to do, lot more to improve.

Add Your Comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed.

Please fill in the missing field(s).

Important: To comment on Tycoon Report articles, you must first log in. If you are a paying customer of Tycoon, you may use the same login and password that you use normally. If you do not yet have a login, please take a moment to register below. It’s free, and you only need to do it once.

Register

(email address and password information will NOT be displayed publicly)

Name *

Email *

Password *

Subscribe to The Tycoon Report
By registering, you agree to our terms of service.

Already a member? Log in!

(you will not be taken away from this page)

Email *

Password *

Remember?

Forgot Password?




Important Notice to all stock spammers, scammers and penny stock pump-and-dumpers: You will get no respect here. Don’t bother submitting fraudulent or misleading information in the guise of an article, because we will remove it. Any piece of content submitted on this site can be removed at the sole discretion of the Tycoon staff.