A Stimulative Federal Spending Cut
Monday, September 8, 2008 | N/A (dixon757) Is this Spam?The number one problem with our republic is that it has become a democratic tyranny which contravenes much of the Constitution. Literally thousands of special handouts to special interests (mostly but not entirely Democrat constituencies) rob us daily. Following Federal legally authorized powers, only national defense and international relations are legit. And of course regulation of interstate commerce, which meant only in the case of tariffs between states.
With that in mind, why should we tolerate 18% spending? How about 16%? The effect of this 2% left in the productive private economy rather than the unproductive federal bureaucracy would be more efficient money use with lasting job creation, higher productivity, lower interst rates, and lower inflation. Keynes would not approve, but he was wrong about government making more efficient investment than private enterprise.
Taxes are an entirely separate issue. although taxation inevitably matches spending (considering that fiat money creation or deficit financing is simply a form of taxation). The Federal tax code is used as a vast nightmarish complex of conflicting provisions to reward specific constituencies. The best thing would be to replace it with a consumption tax, like the Fair Tax. This would have many benefits; more competitive internationally, encourage investment, minimal compliance cost.
Add this all up; a lower federal piece of the economy along with more efficient taxation equals greater prosperity and freedom for all.
Next year we will talk about 14% spending.


