Digg It |   Del.icio.us |   Printer Friendly |   PDF |   Email

China: Be Cautious Where You Invest! Part 2

Tuesday, February 12, 2008 | John M Is this Spam?

Rating:

In Part 1, I discussed China’s political situation and economic perception. In Part 2, I will take a closer look at their economy, and examine some of the strains it faces.

China’s economy is one-dimensional, and lacks concern for the future after manufacturing. Their economy is fueled by foreign demand, primarily to the U.S. The U.S. accounts for over 50% of all China’s exports. It is estimated that foreign demand causes 65% of all domestic investment in China.

The only way to truly continue China’s economic bomb is to retain strict controls over the population. Economically free people demand higher wages, better working conditions, healthcare, and education. Benefits in which the PRC is unwilling to invest.

Even as their society has grown wealthier, healthcare and social benefits severely lag behind modern nations.

Investing in social needs would be crippling to China’s manufacturing business fueled by cheap labor. Manufacturing is already feeling the costs of rising wages (which I will speak about more in depth later).

Another predicament influencing the future of China’s economic success: the PRC’s involvement in enterprise. The majority of China’s enterprises are state owned and operated. Private companies begin to feel party pressure as they find success.

To give you an idea, here is what analysts are saying about the effects of party influence in business:

"Successful businesses have to be successful in business terms - with managers freely exploiting opportunities, developing products and brands and promoting on ability. No such autonomy is possible, party needs come before those of business, enforced by a national system of party committees in every enterprise, finance from state-owned banks and a complex system of accounting and ownership rights that leaves majority ownership of most enterprises with the state," Hutton argues.

Investors are falsely led to believe publicly held companies are free from the state yet "private shareholders have very limited ownership rights; companies' fixed assets are separated out in company accounts and can still only be legally owned by state and public bodies," says MIT economist, Yasheng Huang.

"Government shareholders interfere, especially if a firm is successful. Countless Chinese firms have been driven to bankruptcy or thwarted in their growth ambitions because the government has exercised its ownership privileges to meet party objectives."

Hutton explains state owned enterprises produce significantly less than their private counterparts. "The performance of China's State Owned Enterprises (SOEs), which control two-thirds of industrial assets, has hardly improved during 20 years of reform... SOE’s are on a financial edge and barely profitable."

Call me crazy, but I don’t want any part of it. Think about this situation for a minute! In the U.S. securities industry, we look for quality management before making an investment. This type of analysis is almost obsolete in Chinese corporations.

Is this the type of investment you want to make? When I look around the U.S., the most inefficient companies are state owned and operated. I honestly would not want to invest in anything state owned or operated. But hey, that’s just me.

UNEMPLOYMENT & INFLATION

China's unemployment rate has been reported at a little over 4% since 2001. This figure is a farce and does not reflect actual labor conditions in China. Make no mistake about it, unemployment is a serious problem!

First of all, unemployment numbers are urban and do not account for the rural workers. Rural workers comprise the majority portion of China’s population. Yet, every media outlet gives you a 4% range as a true indicator.

Look a little closer, you will find half the urban workforce is migrant. Migrant workers are excluded from unemployment numbers because they are unable to register for unemployment benefits.

Actual unemployment in urban areas is more in the range of 7 to 8%. Add rural China to the equation, and unemployment is between 12-15%. These statistics also include working for less then a dollar a day as employment. I can go collect cans in the street for more then a dollar a day.

Rural China consists of 60% of the population; as of 2005, 340 million worked in agriculture, 44.8% of population’s total employment.

According to the World Bank, "China is still home to 18 percent of the world’s poor." Between 150 and 300 million people in China live on less than a dollar a day. Nevertheless, as the economy expands, so does inflation, at unprecedented rates.

The World Bank's Quarterly Report showed in September 2007 the consumer price index rose 6.5%, well above the bank's target of 3%. This was the highest rise in inflation in more then a decade.

To give you an idea how the rise in prices is affecting the public: 3 people died and 31 were injured during a stampede in the city of Congging. The stampede occurred while shoppers were trying to get some cooking oil selling at half price. These types of incidents are becoming common throughout China.

CNN reports, "Food prices jumped 17.6 percent in October over the same month last year, while the price of pork, China's staple meat, soared 54.9 percent," according to the National Bureau of Statistics. "The overall October inflation rate was higher than the 6.2 percent reported in September and matched August's 6.5 percent, the highest rate in 11 years." Yikes!

Inflation on food is truly being felt throughout the country, and "the food price spike is especially sensitive for the communist government, because China's poor majority spends as much as one-third of its income on food," according to CNN.

The broader price of food is up over 15% this year.

Officials are reporting inflation at 4.5% for the year. They missed the official target of 3% by 1 1/2 %, a large miss. Furthermore, this figure is what they are reporting; we have no way to know for sure!

CORRUPTION

Government corruption is threatening on many levels. Corruption makes it impossible to reign in pollution and the sale of pirated goods. Each of these factors negatively impacts the economy. Corruption is also the cause of the government's inability to enforce manufacturing standards and limit monetary theft

BBC news says, and a report by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace contends, corruption costs the Chinese economy $86bn a year.

The report points out bribery and theft by officials are rising, and cost China more than its annual education budget.

Carnegie concedes, however, party bosses have taken many measures to tackle the problem. But the report says the leaders have not gone far enough, because they fear losing their grip on power.

"Corruption has not yet derailed China's economic rise, sparked a social revolution, or deterred Western investors," the report states.

"But it would be foolish to conclude that the Chinese system has an infinite capacity to absorb the mounting costs of corruption." Says the report's author, Minxin Pei.

He estimated that 10% of the government's procurement budget and administrative spending was used as illicit payments, bribes, or was simply stolen. The total cost: 0.65% of gross domestic product (GDP). "Even after adjusting for inflation, the sums of money looted by government officials today are astonishing."

Mr. Pei argues the vast scale of corruption is possible "because of extensive state involvement in the economy, and the party's reluctance to adopt necessary reforms." Earlier this year, almost 1,800 officials confessed to corruption.

You must understand this is not a growing democracy weeding out corruption in their path to freedom. This is a communist country where corruption is embedded in the party of absolute rule. To weed out corruption is to weed out communism!

For example, when it comes to pirated goods and enforcing manufacturing standards, corruption is the main obstacle.

Party leaders that oversee provinces (like a governor) rule over vast areas with lower members acting as say, mayors. Pirates sell their knock off goods, and give kickbacks to local party members that send the money up the chain.

The same with manufacturing standards. If a company can produce a good cheaper alternative by ignoring safety measures, party members are paid to look the other way.

This type of corruption is inherent in the system and growing with the party’s wealth. Every aspect of government operation has this type of pay-to-play system.

The west has been pleading with China to increase manufacturing standards for years, and the PRC is still unwilling, or unable, to reign in party leaders and enforce standards.

Recalls, caused by short cuts allowed by corrupted officials, are beginning to hurt China’s imagine as a quality goods producer. Toys were just the latest in a series of recalls involving toothpaste, dog food, and prescription drugs, just to name a few.

Recalls are having an effect. During the holidays, a few relatives told me if I bought presents for the kids, make sure they are not from China. If I could only find toys from China, make sure they have no metal or paint.  To be safe I should probably just get some clothes. I personally think they are taking it to far, but this is the perception being created.

POLLUTION

The biggest problem facing China may be pollution! Manufacturing has been the catalyst behind China’s rise; it may also be the catalyst for their demise!

China's robust industrialization has created the worst pollution the world has ever seen. China has 20 of the world’s 30 most polluted cities. For your info, a significant amount of smog seen in California originates in China.

One scholar says, "Chinese cities often seem wrapped in a toxic gray shroud. Lakes run dry from the constant digging for natural resources."

Recently, the World Bank published a report titled, "The Costs of Pollution in China", detailing dangerously high pollution levels.

The PRC government has been petitioning the World Bank not to include mortality rates, for fear of civil unrest. The report, produced in co-operation with Chinese government’s ministries over several years, found about 750,000 people die prematurely in China each year from pollution, mainly from air pollution in large cities.

Other figures range as high as 1.5 million deaths a year related to pollution.

According to a National Geographic article, "Suppressed Information": "The World Bank is perceived as a staunch ally to China. The organization has committed roughly 40 billion U.S. dollars to Chinas development." They go on to argue World Bank's investment caused them to manipulate, or even leave out, the actual findings.

The most severe pollution problems of any nation in history, the report argues, the total cost of air and water pollution in China is about 5.8% of GDP. Other estimates run as high as 8%.

Air pollution alone produces damages costing 3.8% of GDP, including water pollution and crop damage form acid rain.

Pollution propelled cancer to be the number one cause of death in China. Nearly 500 million people do not have safe drinking water, and only 1% of the 560 million city residents breathe safe air.

Waste is dumped directly into rivers and lakes, causing large portions of the coastline to no longer support marine life. All these factors attribute to the skyrocketing healthcare costs.

Although the government admits there is a pollution problem, the New York Times reports, "most of the government’s targets for energy efficiency, as well as improving air and water quality, have gone unmet. And there are ample signs that the leadership is either unwilling or unable to make fundamental changes."

One analyst puts it this way, "China is more like a teenage smoker with emphysema. The costs of pollution have mounted well before it is ready to curtail economic development. Typically, industrial countries deal with green problems when they are rich, we have to deal with them while we are still poor. There is no model for us to follow," said Ren Yong, a climate expert at the Center for Environment and Economy in Beijing.

The World Bank's research provides alarming evidence that the environment has become one of the biggest causes of death in the nation.

LABOR

The “one birth policy” is one of the most concerning PRC controls morally, but it also affects the economy. The birth control policy has come with wide spread allegations of forced abortions and sterilization. Certain ethnic groups in China are only allowed one child, while others are allowed two.

The one child law created rapid drops in fertility during the 1970’s, yielding a large bulge in the working age.

An aging population, along with rising wages, is going to limit China’s labor surplus and become a significant problem for manufacturing going forward.

According to the World Bank, wages have been rising by "10-15% across all sectors." Even migrant workers are beginning to see increases in wages.

"Based on these trends a number of analysts have argued that China is approaching the end of its labor surplus phase and faces a tightening labor supply, which will inevitably lead to higher wages."

We all know low cost labor has been driving China’s economy, "prospects of rising labor costs are feeding concerns about future competitiveness among foreign investors, policymakers and academics."

Increased wages, along with decreasing demand, makes for a bad combination as manufacturing prices will rise with wages. (If you are interested in labor information, there is a ton out there. I could have written a book on that alone.)

CONCLUSION

Investing in China comes with a Communist government, a one-dimensional economy, skyrocketing inflation, high unemployment, an aging work force, corruption, debilitating pollution, and piracy, among other factors.

The majority of analysts believe China’s party is unable or unwilling to act on these problems. The effects of these problems grow in conjunction with industrial growth. Meaning as they produce more goods, they produce more pollution; as they increase business, they increase their influence over business; as they maintain a one-child policy, they add to the aging population; and so on.

China may very well continue their rapid pace of growth, but growth is just one aspect of an economy. Many other aspects are very, very, alarming.

To dismiss Communism’s affect on China’s economy is to be blinded buy their GDP growth. The government and economy work hand in hand.

My point here is to expose China’s troubles, and show investors China's cheeks are not as rosy as they seem. The political instability, which ways heavily on China’s economic success, should limit investors to only those that can sustain a tough loss.

China is not the type of investment vehicle for retirement or savings. When my dad (a postal worker), is asking me about Chinese stocks to invest in, I know the public is being misinformed. If you are looking for a secure investment for retirement, you are wise to keep your money in the good old US of A.

Investing in the U.S. is hard enough; we all know how unpredictable the U.S. stock markets can be. Trying to understand China’s economy, markets, and effects of government influence with out reliable information is impossible.

I want to be clear: for savvy investors and those with money to gamble, I believe there is money to be made in China!

Just be careful where you invest, and always know both sides of the story before you put your money in it.



Rate this article
Thank you for your vote!

14 Comments

Post your own comment
  1. Bill (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    John M. is, I would say, 100% on the money. There are a couple of minor things in his article I would be inclined to take exception to, but I honestly have not done any research into them. I am currently a resident in China. Expecially in regard to their economy, polution and government, John has described it all very well.



    I would certainly not, and I don't, invest in any individual stocks of Chinese companies. I base this on what my Chinese friends and student have told me, as well as what I can determine myself. If a person wants to use risk capital to invest in some ETFs with holdings in China, I could see that for the time being. Just don't turn your back on it.



    For the most part, the people in the cities are happy. They are enjoying the fruits of capitalism, at least for the time being.



    Thank you John for saying it all better than I could.



    Bill
  2. Fred (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    John:

    As with several other contributors to your article, I too made a mental note that total exports to the US are 17% of China's total - not 50%, which is what you wrote. Who is correct? Can you give us the source of your data. Other than that, I really appreciate your research and commentary thereof. Like others, I have been debating with myself about jumping onto the China bandwagon. But, I had that nagging feeling that China is not a good place for my hard earned money. I knew of some of the reasons for not doing so that you commented upon. Rather, I shifted some of my monies to large nationals that have business in China. This has been fruitful. For example, Procter and Gamble.



    Since you have developed so much interest and knowledge about the "business" of China, keep it up and write more about what is really going on there. Write an extensive article for a business magazine, and spread the word.



    Thank you for your efforts.
  3. John M (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Jester Im sorry, But you are wrong, the U.S. does account for over 50% of China's exports. Look it up.



    John M
  4. jester112358 (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    # I think you covered the nearly the full gamut of the problems China faces which are risk factors except for the problems stemming from the lack a of stable law system and respect for personal property rights. A bit of a joke in a communist society, but critical to capitalism.







    One error I believe you made was the claim that exports to the US are 50% of the total Chinese export. Its actually about 26%. This doesn't alter your well reasoned arguments concerning the fundamental instability of their corrupt political system.







    As one Chinese insider put it, there are hundred of Enrons listed on the Chinese exchanges. We just know who they are right now and won't find out from a closed society like China.

    #
  5. Zack (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    John, have you heard of SWF's (Sovereign wealth funds) China's very potent economic weapon. SWFs are government-run investments financed by excess foreign reserves fueled by chronic trade surpluses. Often acts as a nation's fiscal stabilizer. But China uses its excess foreign reserves in other ways – as a "loss leader" to achieve more nefarious economic goals. A perfect example is China's currency manipulation to boost its exports and create jobs – at the expense of American workers.

    To keep the Chinese yuan pegged and undervalued, China first "sterilizes" its export dollars by issuing bonds to Chinese citizens at high interest rates. China's central bank then maintains the dollar-yuan peg by buying US bonds at substantially lower interest rates. While China earns a negative return, its financial loss is more than offset by China's boost in exports and Gross Domestic Product.

    China also uses its foreign reserves as a political weapon. Whenever pressure builds in the US to curb China's currency manipulation or other unfair trade practices, Chinese government officials threaten to dump their vast US dollar reserves and stop buying US bonds. This "financial nuclear strike," which would cause interest and mortgage rates to soar and probably trigger a US recession, has effectively cowed US politicians.

    Because China has repeatedly demonstrated its willingness to use foreign reserves as an economic and political tool, America has much to lose from the rapidly growing ability of Chinese SWFs to acquire controlling interests in US corporations. One obvious strategic danger is that China may seek to gain control of critical sectors of the US economy – from ports and telecommunications to energy and defense.

    Chinese SWFs, with controlling interests in US corporations, may also try to offshore jobs, managerial best practices, and research and development to China. Even worse, they may also seek to promote technology transfer while nabbing customers in the US. The effect of offshoring jobs and poaching markets hits America's economy immediately – just ask Michigan. Moving America's R&D, managerial elite, and technologies to China significantly reduces future American productivity and growth.



    How our government deals with this real economic danger is something we have to keep an eye on.

    It's in our best interest to keep China as a friend rather than an enemy. Globalization is here. We cannot wish it away or just merely say keep our money in the good old USA. History has proven that isolationism dose not work. China has an untapped pool of cheap labor that will keep it formidable for years to come. There is a bubble on the horizon for China, some say look out now, some say it wont happen for a few years to come. As I have said before China has many pitfalls but if you do your homework it has many great opportunities as well.

    John, keep researching China. Give us as much info as you can gather. Keep in mind that there is an American presence firmly rooted in China as we speak and billions invested. The youth of our great nation needs to understand what is happening on a global scale and I hope your article "lights a fire" within them and any investors who want to trade in China. Remember, due diligence.

    John, thanks for your time and effort. Don't worry about the spelling your doing a lot better than our President. Keep enlightening us.
  6. John M (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    TO ALL: (From John M)



    If you would like to see the World Bank Report: Cost of Pollution: China



    Use the Link Below to Download the report.



    http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/EASTASIAPACIFICEXT/EXTEAPREGTOPENVIRONMENT/0,,contentMDK:21252897~pagePK:34004173~piPK:34003707~theSitePK:502886,00.html
  7. John (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Hot damn that was a good article. Very informative, especially for a person 1 year out of academia. This article should help many of us see the big picture.
  8. George (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    although the comments about China are all valid,part of a good quality investment program includes diversification, geographically as well as by sector and with careful attention to quality. There are many parts of the world where safe quality investments can be made - not just in the "good old US of A
  9. csmasterson (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Excellent, well defined and researched.
  10. C.J.Langley (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Send this to the Chinese embassy in the U.S. They will forward it home, and perhaps the govt. will take note and be motivated to make an even more concentrated effort to remove all of the legitmate complaints listed here. China would benefit from doing so, and investors, in turn, would also benefit.

Add Your Comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed.

Please fill in the missing field(s).

Important: To comment on Tycoon Report articles, you must first log in. If you are a paying customer of Tycoon, you may use the same login and password that you use normally. If you do not yet have a login, please take a moment to register below. It’s free, and you only need to do it once.

Register

(email address and password information will NOT be displayed publicly)

Name *

Email *

Password *

Subscribe to The Tycoon Report
By registering, you agree to our terms of service.

Already a member? Log in!

(you will not be taken away from this page)

Email *

Password *

Remember?

Forgot Password?




Important Notice to all stock spammers, scammers and penny stock pump-and-dumpers: You will get no respect here. Don’t bother submitting fraudulent or misleading information in the guise of an article, because we will remove it. Any piece of content submitted on this site can be removed at the sole discretion of the Tycoon staff.