Digg It |   Del.icio.us |   Printer Friendly |   PDF |   Email

How to Solve this Crisis

Thursday, October 2, 2008 | Marie Albin

Rating:
Boy, I thought the upcoming election would be the polarizing event of the year. But the McCain/Obama showdown looks like a love fest compared to the visceral reaction to the proposed bailout plan.

Tycoon readers have been understandably vocal about the credit crisis, the Paulson proposal, and the House’s subsequent rejection of the plan. As of this writing, it appears that the Senate will pass the new and improved version of the bailout plan, which comes complete with more tax cuts to send the deficit even more into the red.

I thought I’d use today’s issue to compile some of the best Tycoon reader comments and share them with you. Some of you have put forth your own bailout plans. Others of you have used our forum to rant. We welcome all of your comments. Keep them coming.

Let’s focus on the solutions offered by Tycoon readers.

Frank offered this advice based on his three-plus decades in the investment business in response to Teeka’s article, “Should AIG be Saved?”:
    1. Decrease leverage to a maximum of 20 to 1.

    2. Each investment firm must have a qualified risk management department that is not compensated by the performance of the trading desks.

    3. Management at the top has to be educated on the risk of new products and not get involved until they do understand the risks.

    4. Compensation should be geared to completed transactions not on mark to market.
Helmut seems to agree with Frank’s assessment that leverage is the problem here, and advocates going back to an 11 to 1 ratio.
    Speculators thrive on leverage. At 100:1, a 1% move in the right direction means a 100% profit. Of course, in the wrong direction it means a wipe-out. And more than 1% the wrong way, without backup assets, it means someone else goes down with you.

    In the good old days, before deregulation by Congress, commercial banks were required to have a ratio of assets to capital somewhere in the 11:1 range.

    When Long-Term Capital Management went bust, it had a ratio of 28:1, which everyone thought was insane.

    Bear Stearns went belly up with a 33:1 ratio!

    Back in March, the Wall Street Journal reported the leverage ratios of major operators: Morgan Stanley 33:1; Lehman 31:1; Merrill Lynch 28:1, and Goldman Sachs 26:1.

    Leverage is great in a bull market, deadly in a bear market. How deadly for these big names? Lehman is gone already. Bank of America took over Merrill Lynch. Morgan Stanley took over Bear Sterns. What's next?

    I think the "man in the street" shows more sense than the government when he rejects the proposed bailout of the banks, even though he fears that his rejection may lead to another great depression. However, there is no guarantee that the depression will be avoided with the bailout, anyway.

    The "domino effect" has already started and can't be stopped until the last domino has fallen. The government should keep its $700B in reserve until that time and then use it to rebuild the great USA.
[Editor’s Note: Find out how to profit from the crisis on Wall Street. Go here now.]

In response to Teeka’s, “6 Gold & Oil Stocks to Profit from Inflation” article, Mark outlines his ideas on how to fix the system.
    Standardization: All mortgage forms, applications, and trust deeds should be standardized nationwide and capable of having someone with an 8th grade education understand exactly what they are getting into. A minimum of 10% down-payment on the property. If you are not willing to put your own money into a property, then why should we? Anyone putting less than 20% down must carry mortgage insurance until their payments have reached 20% of the original purchase price.

    Due Diligence: If you are not willing to perform due diligence on an application, then you have no business being in the market to start with. You have to know exactly what the property is, where it is located and whether the applicant can truly afford the payments or not.

    Education: I would like to see mandatory basic financial education in our schools nationwide. I don't think you should be able to graduate high school without being able to read and fully understand a mortgage application and how the payments are figured. If the schools won't do it, then Wall Street and bankers nationwide should volunteer their time to the school systems for assemblies. We, the people of the United States, had better start learning how money works before we start spending what we don't have.

    Also under education, the next time Congress or a President comes up with a plan to increase home ownership by reducing the mortgage standards, Wall Street should:

    a. Tell them to take a flying leap off a rolling doughnut and...
    b. Spend the money to produce the TV commercials and remind the American people about what we are all going through now.

    Responsibility: If you walk away from a house and mortgage, then you can never get another mortgage in the USA. If you trash your house before it goes into foreclosure, you are responsible for the cleanup costs. If your house goes into a short sale, you have to work with the lender to find a common amount that you still owe before you can ever get another mortgage in the USA.

    On the lender side, it is better to work with your clients than to just hang them out to dry. If someone loses their job or other source of income, then work with them. It is still better to get some payment each month than to go into foreclosure. Especially in times like these when property values keep falling. If it becomes a habit though, give them 60-days notice and then sell it.
Chester puts forth some rather creative ideas to help resolve the financial crisis.
    The government should not only allow, but insist that every person that has a 401K that is tied into a sub-prime or prime loan that is in danger of default must use their 401K -- without any penalties for early withdrawal and without any taxes applied to the 401K balance – toward paying off their current mortgage holder to lower the loan balance. In return, the mortgage holder must refinance the remaining balance at an attractive fixed-rate 30-year (or fewer) mortgage with no creativity allowed. For a refinance, that is less than:

    - 70% of current "fair and reasonable" appraisal value a 3% or less rate

    - 70% to 75% to 3.5% to 4.0% rate

    - 75% to 80% to 4.1% to 5.0% rate

    - 80% to 95% to 5.1% to a maximum of 6.5% rate

    If applying one’s entire 401K to their outstanding mortgage balance does not bring the mortgage balance to at or below 95% of the "fair and reasonable" market value, then that individual or couples, in cases of the married, 401K is not to be used and be left alone. If their mortgage goes into default, it will be up to the market forces at hand to resolve the issue.
Others made specific recommendations for where to put your money in the current climate. Fijiisland advises buying gold and silver. “Even better, buy gold and silver miners. A 20% increase in their commodities prices translates into a 50% increase in profits. No matter what the government does, gold and silver go higher.”

Cpr48 says that banks will lead the rally when the bull market returns. “Financials will have to finance big companies and little companies to grow and expand. They have big fears of loaning money to risky investments right now but they will loan money on safe bets that have a good credit risk. In doing so, their stocks will lead the bull market return whenever it does happen!”

Thanks, everybody, for submitting your thoughts on the current economic crisis. Keep them coming!


(Please let us know what you think about Marie Albin's article.)
Rate his article here »



Marie Albin
Managing Editor
The Tycoon Report


Rate this article
Thank you for your vote!

21 Comments

Post your own comment
  1. Cuadra (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Marie,

    Fantastic job with the comments on the different articles. They really add a good new dimension.

    Congratulations!
  2. Noel (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    As a 35 year real estate investor(landlord) with dozens of rentals, I can say unequivocally that if you haven't been a landlord or read a good textbook on the subject, you have NO IDEA how the money "works" in real estate investing. So get a TEXTBOOK on the subject before making pronouncements about it... you'll be surprised--but not mystified--about the realities of how it all really works.

    EX: Unbeknownst to the vast majority of tenants, the landlord is charging you, on nationwide average, ONE-HALF of the true cost of owning the property you occupy. Tax shelters pay the rest, and your rents would DOUBLE if the shelters disappeared.. Those "shelters-$$" are given to you by the landlord, cutting your rent in half.



    This is only one example of many of how the money really works. Tenants have it far better than they realize, on a monthly cost basis.



    My "education" in this business came in the classroom, studying many additional books, and 35 yrs of experience--living it. Please at least educate yourself and your kids before commenting about it. "Everyone has a right to an opinion, but no one has the right to be wrong about the facts." Please get 'em straight--at least your children may benefit from facts instead of listening to ill-informed guesswork.
  3. mike (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    You are right on !!! now how can we get the powers to be on this line of thinking??
  4. Neena (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    It sounds like you've never been a part of the middle class, let alone the lower middle class or among the poor. In order to get the largest tax deduction available to individuals, and the only deduction available on any outstanding credit obligation a consumer can hold since the Carter administration, a person or family needs to have a mortgage, otherwise they are handing their biggest tax deduction to straight to their landlord and receiving no benefit from it.



    Making home ownership possible is a valid and needed driver for our economy. Your suggestions, while admirable in some sense, neglect to consider this.



    A 10% down requirement on a home loan without exception leaves persons completely out of the market even though they could afford the payment on the mortgage. While they are already paying a rental amount equal to that mortgage amount, they will be trying to save for 10 years for a 10% down, by which time the price of a home that is suited to their lifestyle will have increased to a point they no longer have 10% to pay down. If the person can pay the mortgage payment, what does it matter if they make a down payment or not? Credit checks are done to determine credit worthiness as a matter of course. The mortgage lender, if the loan is held to maturity, will collect, depending on the interest rate on the note, between 2 and 3 times its original face value.



    You've painted a pretty broad stroke of generalizations when it comes to walking away from a house and mortgage. I agree that someone who walks away should be penalized, but a ban for life from a mortgage in the US seems excessive to say the least! Circumstances change, divorces and remarriages occur, as do job situations, medical emergencies can happen, and any number of other issues.



    Along with standardized mortgage applications, fixed rate mortgages should be the law of the land. ARM's should become nothing but a painful memory.



    Second mortgages, now know as either home equity loans or home equity lines of credit, should be banned completely. Marketing firms must have come up with those terms: they sound so much less like mortgaging your future.



    Adjustable rate home loans and second mortgages cause the artificial inflation of home values. Face it, the huge jump in home prices over the last 5 or 6 years was not driven by actual increases in home values, (you should see some of the dilapidated shacks that appraise now at $150K in Salt Lake City) but by the greed and lack of common sense of home owners and lenders alike, with increasing pressure on appraisers to artificially inflate the value of homes, so that higher loans could be written, which artificially inflated home values overall. This is compounded by homeowners' expectation (fueled in part by the house-flipping craze) that if they remodel a room for $10K they will earn an equity bump of $15K or more, so they can turn around and do the same for a new kitchen, and so on.



    I do agree that mortgage lenders be required to accept less than the full outstanding amount in arrears. I also know that there are circumstances beyond loss of primary employment that should be recognized as hardship situations.



    Allowing use of funds from one's 401K to catch up mortgage payment make perfect sense, though for those of use whose employers have dropped their previous retirement plans in favor of 401K's should be allowed to take a loan instead if there is a reasonable expectation the loan would be repaid.
  5. chris (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    The only way to do this is ; some thing for every one ;;;;seeing as how their greed & lack of

    risk knowledge caused this ; the lenders should

    have to help not just get a free ride / hand out..lets use a old rule . KISS.....

    keep it simple/stupid is the old rule ; dont complcate it ; give them some money to get out

    of trouble , but not for free & give main street some thing ... how to fix this mess '''''''..make them discount all the existing loans they hold be it 1st , 2nd , 3rd , or equity line. by 15% to..25%. lower the instrest rates nationaly to 4.5 to 5.0% max , buy the notes at a discount of 30% to 50%... they are spending more than this is foreclosuser costs & loss of value in their company stocks.....

    as the market justed showed you... help every body not just the banks, investers & wall

    strreet.. reinstate the over site thAt was there in the pre bush years when Regan was Pressident..

    Make the short sellers either own or buy the opiton rto do so , no mare naked short selling ... reduce the amount of leverage allowed..nationalize fanni & freddi ( I know what this sounds like ) but that is what they

    were to begin with goverment enities... use them

    to lower the instrest rates .... If some thing

    isn't done in this aspect/reguard instrest rates will go thru the roof because the lenders have their heads up their rears as usual ... when money is cheep they give it away like just happened & caused this mess to any warm body ; not cking to see if they could repay ... now when

    they should be reasonable abount lending they

    wont give out a dime ( realistic lenders,loan on value not air/pipe dreams ) ... so if congress

    & the goverment dont do something about this side ,all the money they just spent will be for

    nought , thrown in the trash , a hell of a waste of good money...it is not only the credit markets that have a issue the people have ost faith .. that is what needs to be restored ...

    help them, also or this will not work ....
  6. George (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    I am appauled at the fact that one person such as the president of our country can dictate removal of a regulation.

    If cogressioal approval is required to pass laws, it should also be required to rescind regulations that were enacted with much deliberation initially.
  7. oloeru (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    XX
  8. brijtoofar (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Correction Marie: JP Morgan took over BS, not Morgan Stanley



    BS=Bear Stearns; how appropriate
  9. Lois (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    I wish I knew what the solution was. Today I was watching the news and they were talking about all of this unnecessary pork spending which was going into this what they call bailout and I'm thinking things are not going to change even when the people are voicing their opinions. I can't believe it. Then today I received the following link which made me even more angry.



    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RZVw3no2A4&feature=iv&annotation_id=event_597487
  10. Michael O (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Ethan,



    Thank you. Use whatever you like. It would be an honor. Tycoon has been very good to me.



    Mike

Add Your Comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed.

Please fill in the missing field(s).

Important: To comment on Tycoon Report articles, you must first log in. If you are a paying customer of Tycoon, you may use the same login and password that you use normally. If you do not yet have a login, please take a moment to register below. It’s free, and you only need to do it once.

Register

(email address and password information will NOT be displayed publicly)

Name *

Email *

Password *

Subscribe to The Tycoon Report
By registering, you agree to our terms of service.

Already a member? Log in!

(you will not be taken away from this page)

Email *

Password *

Remember?

Forgot Password?




Important Notice to all stock spammers, scammers and penny stock pump-and-dumpers: You will get no respect here. Don’t bother submitting fraudulent or misleading information in the guise of an article, because we will remove it. Any piece of content submitted on this site can be removed at the sole discretion of the Tycoon staff.