Digg It |   Del.icio.us |   Printer Friendly |   PDF |   Email

Big Profits in Big Oil Still?

Monday, April 7, 2008 | Dylan Jovine

Rating:
HAVE YOU SEEN THE LATEST POLITICAL AD ATTACKING BIG OIL?

This one was made by the Obama campaign, and has been playing all over Pennsylvania ahead of the coming Democratic primary elections.

It's called "Nothing's Changed," and here's an excerpt:

"Since the gas lines of the ’70’s, Democrats and Republicans have talked about energy independence, but nothing’s changed — except now Exxon’s making $40 billion a year, and we’re paying $3.50 for gas.

I’m Barack Obama.  I don’t take money from oil companies or Washington lobbyists, and I won’t let them block change anymore.  They’ll pay a penalty on windfall profits.  We’ll invest in alternative energy, create jobs and free ourselves from foreign oil.

I approve this message because it’s time that Washington worked for you.  Not them."
Although there was nothing original in this silly attack on big oil, I did spend a few minutes wondering how such smart guys like Barack Obama and his chief political strategist David Axelrod let this ad fly.

Here's what I've come up with:


LOCATION:  Barack Obama for President National Campaign Headquarters.

SCENE:  Two people are standing in a conference room that has been converted into a political "War Room."  On the table is a big electoral map of Pennsylvania.  Both people are talking feverishly and pointing at different locations on the map.  One person, Barack Obama, looks far more energized than does his Chief Political Advisor David Axelrod.

David Alexrod:  You can't go there.  It's too far to the left.

Obama:  I have to.  It's the only way I can even think about winning PA.

Axelrod:  No, you can't.  Look — as your senior political advisor, I have to warn you that moving that far to the left would be political suicide.

Obama:  But David, I just don't see a choice here.  The longer this goes on, it moves to Hillary's advantage.  If I don't make strong inroads in PA I could be ruined.

Axelrod:  But don't forget rule #1 of running an "insurgent" campaign — move too far to the left during the primaries and you can't move to the center during a general election.  Frankly, Bill Clinton almost made the same mistake in 1992, but fortunately his senses got the better of him.

Obama:  You mean you and Carville and Stephenopolous got the better of him.

(Axelrod smiles.  Yes, he loved insurgent campaigns indeed.  And he couldn't believe his luck.  Lightning did strike twice in his lifetime.  Bill Clinton in '92 and Barack Obama in '08.  And all he had to do was dust off the same play-book Clinton used in '92 and Viola!  Here we are.  Bob Strum eat your heart out.)

Obama (coughing loud so David will stop daydreaming):  So what ... I'm going after big oil?  Everybody hates big oil.  They're robbing American citizens left and right.  Gas is now $3.50 per gallon!

Axelrod (explaining it patiently, once again):  But remember Barack.  There's really no such thing as "windfall profits."  Companies like ExxonMobil — well the whole oil industry really — they make big profits when oil is high and little profits when oil is low.  Throughout the 1990's oil was really cheap.  From 1998 to 2003 oil was floating around $12 per barrel.  So the oil companies had 10 years of making little profits, and then come 10 years of big profits ...

Obama (finishing David's sentence):  "And in the end it really all averages out."  I know, I know.  Come on David.  Of course I know that.

Axelrod:  The truth is that big oil hasn't made "windfall profits" since Rockefeller was running Standard Oil and they broke the monopoly.

Obama (cutting David off):  Look David, that's not the point here.  We all know we need big oil.  What are we gonna do?  Let the Saudis and Venezuelans run rampant around the globe?  Not on my watch.  I know we need big oil to compete with the big oil companies worldwide.

(Obama pauses for a moment to catch his breath.)

Obama:  And I know that 99% of the stock of big oil is owned by American investors.  Heck, 99% of the people in the audience who applaud when I attack big oil own the stocks through their IRA and don't even know it.  So obviously they haven't put 2 and 2 together, or they wouldn't be clapping.

Axelrod:  But ...

Obama (cutting him off):  There's no "but" about it David.  You see their faces when we attack big oil.  It works all the time.  The reason it works is because they're feeling the pain at the pump.  It doesn't matter to them that every time gas prices at the pump rise 50 cents, the Exxon stock they own goes up 10%.  They don't care about making money later — they need relief now!

Axelrod (trying to calm his young protege):  Yes Barack, but remember, you already have 3 strikes left of center.  During the general election all Republicans have to do is show you (1) hugging Ted Kennedy, (2) being supported by MoveOn.org, and (3) pictures of your pastor Mr. Wright.  They will Swift-Boat you into the radical hippie-left before you can say "Jimmy Carter."

Obama (sighing knowingly):  I know, I know.  But we first have to get to the general election.  Even if that means making stupid anti-capitalist, ultra-populist, far-left attacks on big oil.  And don't forget David — big oil knows the game, too.  They know the pendulum has swung to the left of center in this election cycle.


Anyway, that's as far as I've taken the conversation.  Anybody want to help extend the conversation by adding to it?

Please do so by clicking on "Post a Comment" below ...


(Please let us know what you think about Dylan Jovine's article.)
Rate his article here »



Dylan Jovine
Contributing Editor
The Tycoon Report


Mark Your Economic Calendar: What's ahead for the week of April 7, 2008
Economic Calendar for the Week of April 07 - April 11

Wednesday, April 9

8:30AM - Initial Claims

Release Details
  • Importance (A-F): This release merits a C .
  • Source: The Employment and Training Administration of the Department of Labor.
  • Release Time: 8:30 ET each Thursday (data for week ended prior Saturday).
  • Raw Data Available At: http://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/eta/main.htm.
Initial jobless claims measure the number of filings for state jobless benefits. This report provides a timely, but often misleading, indicator of the direction of the economy, with increases (decreases) in claims potential signalling slowing (accelerating) job growth. On a week-to-week basis, claims are quite volatile, and many analysts therefore track a four week moving average to get a better sense of the underlying trend. It typically takes a sustained move of at least 30K in claims to signal a meaningful change in job growth.

There are two other statistics in this report -- the number of people receiving state benefits and the insured unemployment rate; neither is watched closely by the market. Some analysts track the number of people receiving state benefits from month to month as a guide for job growth, though this series has a poor track record in predicting the monthly employment report. The insured unemployment rate changes little on a weekly basis and is never a factor for the market.

Highlights
  • Initial claims shot 38K higher to 407K in the week of March 29.
  • Continued claims jumped 97K higher to 2.937 mln in the week of March 22.
Key Factors
  • The surge to above 400K marks a significant worsening in the labor market.
  • The American Axle strike is partly behind the lift in mid-March, but not this week's.
  • 4-week average rose to 375K.
  • The 4-week average of continued claims has now surpassed the Hurricane Katrina effects and well above level at the start of last two recessions.
Big Picture

The early January lows near 300K compared to the 370K levels in late January, February and March as the last week of March reached a high 407K.  The current 375K 4-week average is above the averages at the start of the last two recessions.  Continued claims (a better read on hiring) also reached the highest level in 3 1/2 years as the 4-week average stands well above the levels at the start of the last two recessions.  Claims provide a nearly real time read on layoffs and the labor market as the employment report reflects the broader combined read of layoffs and hiring. 


Thursday, April 10

08:30AM - International Trade

Release Details
  • Importance (A-F): This release merits a C .
  • Source: The Census Bureau and the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the Department of Commerce.
  • Release Time: 8:30 ET around the 20th of the month (data for two months prior).
  • Raw Data Available At: http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/www/press.html.
The trade report is most widely watched for trends in the overall trade balance. But trends in both exports and imports of goods and services bear watching as well. The export data in particular are important to watch for indications that a strengthening competitive position at home and/or strengthening economies overseas are boosting U.S. growth. Imports provide an indication of domestic demand, but given the severe lag of this report relative to other consumption indicators, it is not particularly valuable for this purpose.

The volatility in the monthly trade balance can play an important role in GDP forecasts. Net exports are a relatively volatile component of GDP, and the trade report provides the only early clues to the net export performance each quarter.

Highlights
  • Raw Data Available At: http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/www/press.html

Friday, April 11

10:00AM - University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index

Release Details
  • Importance (A-F): This release merits a B-.
  • Source: The University of Michigan.
  • Release Time: Preliminary: 10:00 ET on the second Friday of the month (data for current month); Final: 10:00 ET on the fourth Friday of the month (data for current month).
The Michigan index is almost identical to the Conference Board Consumer Confidence index, though there are two monthly releases, a preliminary and final reading. Like the Conference Board index, it has two subindexes - expectations and current conditions. The expectations index is a component of the Conference Board's Leading Indicators index.



Rate this article
Thank you for your vote!

22 Comments

Post your own comment
  1. MARY (15 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    vERY INFORMATIVE....WILL HAVE TO GO BACK OVER PART

    OF IT AGAIN.

    WAS THERE SUSPOSE TO BE A RECOMENDATION OF STOCK... OR DID I MISS IT...
  2. Don (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Great dialogue. Most fun I've had beginning a day in a long time. have you submitted it to SNL yet? Make a good skit. There, now commentors can bitch at me instead of you but that's okay.
  3. mile (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Shame on you for mis-titling your article about how to make Big Oil Profits and giving us a bunch crap instead.
  4. Julia (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    The Tycoon Report became popular for its financial advice - not politics; delving into politics, with a specific focus on one candidate is NOT advantageous. I expect more from "The Tycoon Report" than that. Maybe my expectations are too high.
  5. mike (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    great work dylan. you might take a few hits for this one but they only get mad because they believe you to be right and want you to be wrong.

    ethan r. great comments, i agree that McCain is right on with his advice and people will hate him for being so blunt with the truth.
  6. Sue (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    One of the factors related to gasoline pricing, is that we have not built any refineries, in the last several decades. As I understand it,much of the oil from Alaska is shipped to Panama for refining and then shipped back to the U.S.

    Perhaps Sen. Obama needs to be reminded that the Dems have put up the road blocks to further drilling in places like ANWAR.

    Lastly, I don't think any of the candidates has the slightest idea what the voting public is thinking! One thing for sure, it's not "shared prosperity", Mr. Obama!
  7. Victor J (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Obama, is long on the slick rhetoric, but very short on solutions.He has no track record of any substance, and he is a Marxist/ socialist.Check out his Senate voting record both in Illinois, and the U.S.Senate.

    He plays well to the ultraliberal,and some Democrats but Independents,Republicans and consevative Democrats are not going to vote for him for President, should he be the Democrat Nominee.
  8. Vincent (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Axelrod (brightening up): But wait, maybe there is a way to make your attack on big oil and without being tagged as a radical leftie. Think about this, what has McCain been saying been and over throughout his campaign?

    Obama: “I’m going after Osama?”

    Axelrod: Don’t even go there! No, it’s something even more ludicrous. He’s gone and jumped on the Goreball warming, alarmist scare. He’s either swallowed that hook, line and sinker, or he’s playing a political ploy, and tapping into a groundswell of public opinion.

    Obama (looking indignant): David, let me remind you that is also one of my cards. Why, McCain’s only promised a 60% cut in carbon emissions, and I, – I have promised 80%.

    Axelrod: Exactly! And here’s what we do. We go after big oil, but only on the basis that we’ve got to save the planet – show pictures of some polar bears and some melting glaciers. If the McCain camp comes back with any of that left wing nonsense, we’ll just shout ‘hypocrite!’ His own pledge of a 60% cut in carbon emissions is no less than a stealth attack on the oil industry. And if we promise to continue with Bush’s plan of producing 35 billion gallons of ethanol a year with enormous subsidies to the farm industry, we’ll clean up in the Mid West as well.
  9. Ethan R (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Hi Dylan, EthanR here. This Obama guy is one smart cookie. You have to be to be able to be on the verge of putting the Clintons away. It's like one baseball team getting three outs, while their opponents get five. Somehow, the odds are always stacked against the Clinton opponent.



    People need to realize that a weak US dollar will make both gold and oil prices rise. So what makes the US dollar weak? That's right our national debt and deficit spending. It starts with the congress, which loves to throw pork around like a Memorial day barbecue in Texas, and it only gets worse with the U.S. consumer, who never met a credit card or a five year car loan they didn't love.



    I want to address Barbara's comment about John McCain's 8 houses, and his comment that people facing foreclosure should get a second job and skip their vacation. While he may sound arrogant and flip for not being more compassionate, McCain (and believe me I am not a huge fan of his either) does at least have the antidote for economic problems. When it comes to budgets, one can either earn more money, or spend less, or both. So McCain is right on with his advice, if not his bedside manner.



    Let's stop punishing hard work and the rewards that come from it! So what if he has eight houses. The man earned every dime to buy them. And for all you know he could be mortgaged to the hilt on them, and have very little equity. By the same token, lets stop taxing successful companies to death. If Exxon-Mobil loses 20 Billion dollars next year, and some alternative energy company makes a 20 Billion Dollar profit, will the Democrats call the alt energy boys before congress, give them a tongue lashing, and then demand that they pay a rebate to Exxon-Mobil? That I have to see with my own eyes.



    John M., you make me laugh so hard with your descriptive icons. A bit too stereotyped perhaps, but you are not far from being 100% on the money.



    Dylan, you will definitely take some shots for writing this article, but kudos to you for sticking your neck out to put forth such a controversial subject.
  10. Norm (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Thank you #6 Joe...Why do liberals-proud shareholders in their newest endeavor, the Liberial Oil Corporation--seem to think they are the cornerstone of the world?...I'm glad they are finally taking the time to obtain and refine oil(How hard could it be? Ever heard of Jed Clampett). I'm sure within a matter of months they will be #1 baby!

    On another note, if gas was cheap, cheap, cheap, wouldn't it be gone, gone, gone! So what will ultimately harness green house emissions-- readily available cheap carbon fuel or prudent usage of same? Who will research alternate fuels--non-profit corporations or innovative corporations with a ample research budget?...SIGH...Buy a Harley, I did at 56...Damn it's fun! Do you also realize one half of the people driving have IQ's under 100...Make gasoline consumption the privilege it really is by getting idiots-both young and old--off the road...

Add Your Comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed.

Please fill in the missing field(s).

Important: To comment on Tycoon Report articles, you must first log in. If you are a paying customer of Tycoon, you may use the same login and password that you use normally. If you do not yet have a login, please take a moment to register below. It’s free, and you only need to do it once.

Register

(email address and password information will NOT be displayed publicly)

Name *

Email *

Password *

Subscribe to The Tycoon Report
By registering, you agree to our terms of service.

Already a member? Log in!

(you will not be taken away from this page)

Email *

Password *

Remember?

Forgot Password?




Important Notice to all stock spammers, scammers and penny stock pump-and-dumpers: You will get no respect here. Don’t bother submitting fraudulent or misleading information in the guise of an article, because we will remove it. Any piece of content submitted on this site can be removed at the sole discretion of the Tycoon staff.