Digg It |   Del.icio.us |   Printer Friendly |   PDF |   Email

The Mortgage Industry Is Killing The Real Estate Market!

Friday, April 18, 2008 | Ethan Roberts

Rating:
In last week's Tycoon Report, I wrote about how the politicians continue to spit out one proposal after another, ostensibly designed to help poor homeowners who can't pay their subprime mortgage payments, but in reality just new ways to stick it to the taxpayers to foot the bill for the needy and the greedy. 

Today I want to tell you about another facet of the Real Estate fiasco.  This is the story that few in the general public really know about.  This is about how the mortgage industry itself is killing the Real Estate market!

Now, that would seem to be a contradiction, would it not?  I mean, isn't it suicidal for those who make their living selling mortgages to actually kill the golden goose (aka Real Estate) that creates those very loans?

This paradox does not go unnoticed by savvy individuals in the Real Estate industry.  The cause of this suicidal behavior is nothing more than fear.  The big money mortgage lenders are terrified of the ongoing risk of defaults, precipitated by falling home values.  Yet their latest actions, while designed for self protection (CYA), are ironically hurting the Real Estate industry even more.  It is akin to panicky people on a lifeboat in a stormy sea, rocking the boat in an effort to save themselves.  In so doing, the boat turns over, drowning them all.  Let me explain.

This week, Vertice Lending, the wholesale mortgage subsidiary of Wachovia Securities, put out a "Declining-Distressed Markets Policy Update" bulletin to all mortgage companies that in essence said the following:

Maximum financing should not be considered when property values are declining.  If Vertice has assessed that a particular area is "soft", i.e. declining in value, instead of the minimum 5% down payment that is now required, the minimum will be increased to 10%.  Plus the loan must be a "Full Doc" documentation type of loan.

In addition, if the appraiser indicates that there is an oversupply of properties in the subject neighborhood, or that the marketing time is over six months, or makes any other comments that might suggest a declining or distressed market, then again the maximum loan amount given must be reduced by 5%.

Included with the bulletin was an absurd 263 page PDF of the various "distressed" areas across the country, as identified by Vertice.  Had they put out a PDF of the "non-distressed" areas, it probably would have run about two pages and saved the reader a lot of time!  In my region of Florida, some of the nicest parts of town were said to be "distressed", including my own zip code!

What?!  Suddenly, I got so angry, I ran outside and like a mad man, started pulling all the weeds up from my lawn.  "Distressed?  Who, me?  I'll show them!" I said to nobody in particular.  But alas, an hour later, even though my lawn was now the absolute toast of the neighborhood, the Vertice PDF still contained my zip code, and my house was still listed as "distressed".  Oh, swell.

These days, mortgage loan officers just don't know what to do.  Mortgage standards keep changing on a weekly basis, and there is no consistency among the major lenders.  The underwriting process for FHA loans, which once took about two days, is now averaging more like nine days.  New regulations have the mortgage processors scrambling to get the correct documentation to the underwriters.  But if the documentation isn't correct or complete, the underwriters kick it back, and suspend the file until it is.  Conventional loans that once took 14-21 days to complete are now running 30-40 days.  Inexperienced mortgage companies are glutting up the system by sending application packages to multiple lenders, in an effort to guarantee their loans will go through.  Even among experienced Brokers, chaos is ruling the day.

So on the one hand, you have the FED and the Washington politicians doling out rate cuts and stimulus packages like it's Christmas morning.  But on the other hand, you have the mortgage industry, under pressure from Freddie Mac, tightening and tightening their own requirements.  The average consumer is caught in this holy war between Santa Claus and the Grinch. 

Average Joe says, "Honey, let's buy a house!  Rates are low, prices have come down, and this apartment is just too small for us."  So they go to a mortgage company to get pre-qualified for a loan.  A Realtor takes them out, and shows them 6-10 homes.  They find a home they like, their offer to the seller is accepted, and then begins the nightmare that is the 2008 mortgage process.  Initially, all goes well.  They meet with the mortgage loan officer, fill out some forms, and hand over documents such as their W-2's, and two years of tax returns.  They are filled with excitement, and start telling all their friends and relatives about the great home they have found.

But two weeks later, they receive the dreaded phone call.
 
"Hello, Average Joe?  This is Marty Mortgage.  I'm afraid I have some bad news.  Due to some new changes in the mortgage lender's requirements, they are saying that you need to increase your down payment from 5% to 10% for that house over on Blueberry Hill Lane.  Yes, that's right... What's that, you don't have enough money?  Hmmm, well, can you borrow from Mom or Dad?  Sell an old truck?  Anything? No? Well then we may have to go with an FHA loan, there's a much smaller down payment required...  What's that?  Why is the additional down payment needed?  Well, the lender says the house is considered distressed, because it's in an area with an oversupply of homes, declining home values, and..."

"CLICK!"

"Hello?...  Joe, are you still there?...  Hello?!"

There is a similar version of this phone call, in which Marty Mortgage calls Average Joe to tell him that due to changes in the lender's requirements, Joe's mediocre credit score is no longer acceptable without an additional 5% down or perhaps a 2% higher interest rate.  You can imagine how happy Joe is to receive that call as well.

I like to sit back in my chair sometimes, close my eyes, and dream a little.  In Ethan Roberts' perfect world, every potential first time home buyer has their 20% down payment already in savings, buys an affordable home with no more than a 15 year mortgage, and has at least a 700 credit score.  Then I open my eyes, and remember that in the real world, most potential first time buyers have $1500 or less in the bank, a credit score in the low 600's, a wallet full of maxed out credit cards, and would gladly take a 60 year mortgage if it were offered!

To reiterate a point that I made in my last article, if we are going to expect 1970 behavioral standards from a society with 2008 lifestyles, we will have a real problem. 

The mortgage industry is about to choke itself to death with their ever tightening requirements, simply as a means to protect themselves from having more defaults in the future.  As fewer and fewer people can qualify to buy a home, the inventory of unsold homes will continue to rise, and the prices will continue to fall.  As a result, we are nowhere near the bottom of the market yet.

I cannot say that I blame the mortgage industry for their timidity.  Once burned, twice shy is the old saying.  One reader called me to task last week for not providing any solutions myself for the housing mess.   So this week I will offer the following four suggestions:

1) Give a tax credit to anyone who buys a foreclosure home.  Owner occupants can get a larger credit, but investors should get a small one as well.  Let's clean up the blighted homes, get the huge supply of neglected foreclosures off the market which kill area values, and reward people for a change whose sweat and labor help to stabilize communities.  To those who say that doing this will keep non-foreclosure homes sitting longer on the market, I say bunk.  Despite the tax credit, most people still prefer to move into a home that does not need cosmetic and/or structural work.

2) The Government needs to pressure companies like Vertice to back off from their "Declining-Distressed" policy.  Any policies which reduce the number of potential home buyers are not going to help the home market to stabilize.  Let the lender raise the interest rate another 1/4 point if need be, but don't increase the down payment requirement.  Additionally, there should be a differentiation made between areas that are declining by just a few percent versus areas that are down 15-20%.  Not every zip code in the entire country is declining to the same degree!

3) Before they can get a mortgage, all potential home buyers with credit scores below 700 should be required to complete an extensive course in homeownership, with a heavy emphasis on budgeting and financial responsibility.  Our national failure to educate people on how to manage and maintain a home is one of the reasons we have so many mortgage defaults and subsequent foreclosures.

4) Make it mandatory that all new FHA mortgages are set up to have direct withdraws from the home owner's paycheck(s) sent directly from the employer to the mortgage company.  This could be done in the same way that pay is taken out for 401k plans or health care.  Businesses can be compensated via tax benefit for any costs incurred to do this.  In this way the mortgage gets paid before the home owner ever sees their pay check.  If the home owner gets paid twice a month, the amount deducted from each check can be half of each payment.  If both spouses work, the system can be set up for whatever way will be most convenient and best for them.

Another comment from last week's article questioned why I said that something needs to be done.  Why can't we just let the Real Estate market find its own level of price support? 

I think we need to realize that houses are not like apples, in that the free market takes care of prices and we should just let it be, no matter what happens. 

There are hundreds of thousands of jobs that depend on the Real Estate market.  Think about it:  Mortgage companies, Realtors, appraisers, surveyors, attorneys, title companies, home and termite inspectors, builders, roofers, tilers, plumbers, electricians, painters, landscapers, companies like Home Depot and Lowes, and on and on.  Many of those people are now underemployed or unemployed, and not spending money in your restaurant or beauty salon or retail store.  Then your small business loses money, so what do you do?  You are forced to lay off some of your staff.  Then those people cut back on what they can buy as well. 

According to the latest Associated Press-AOL poll, only 11% of the people asked said they will buy a house within the next two years, and 60% said they definitely won't buy, because they believe that prices will continue to decline over the next year.

So if we do NOTHING, and the housing market is allowed to decay, the ripple effect will throw us into a severe recession, perhaps even a depression, a la 1930.  Granted, homes did appreciate too much and too quickly between 2003-2006.  But if we do nothing, depreciation could mean that even homes that were purchased a dozen or more years ago will no longer have any equity left. 

Is that what we want?  Do you think that a Laissez Faire attitude toward our largest assets is really good for our economy and our future? 

My answer is NO, and so I implore Vertice, and all the other mortgage companies to:

 "Stop killing the Real Estate market!"


(Please let us know what you think about Ethan Roberts's article.)
Rate his article here »



Ethan Roberts
Contributing Editor
The Tycoon Report




Rate this article
Thank you for your vote!

37 Comments

Post your own comment
  1. pat (28 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    Laissez Faire attitude on the job is what help fuel this crap. You let coworkers do whatever they wanted to.Sit and do nothing hostile work environments .LIES, CONSTANT CHAOS AND OUTSOURCING.

    Crooks at the top not watching the crooks at the bottom . Rich people have no intention of paying off a house and can afford the large payments. For everyone else you can not.I stayed in a starter house for 18 years that is how much things changed in Chicago. Went fro two good jobs to not much hope for the future. Young people saw their parents get outsourced and downsized, get sick, die stuff happens and as it stands now no one has an extra nickel to help you out. You can not afford to stay home with your children .You tell people to look at homes a a lower price STARTER HOMES No one wants an old house that needs work if the new one has the same payment. NO one told them about taxes , assessments,schools.Older homes are made better the schools need help and the neighborhoods need some new life breathed into them. Taxes are lower for older homes . Not a very good environment for people like me .I had to have 20% I had to save first. RENT first.For 32 years i did not buy granite counter tops and redo the entire house every 5 years.If you are very rich and you did that fine. Some one has to be in Charge when human nature gets out of control.

    Perhaps a plan to fill in the foreclosed but the crime/drugs has got to go.
  2. Mike (28 weeks ago) Is this Spam?

    A very timely and accurate piece! I am an appraiser in Central Ohio and see this as absolute truth. What we are seeing recently is a shift of loan scrutinization towards the high credit and borrower with sizeable equity...What kind of sense does this make when we are told that the "meltdown" was driven by high loan to value products and unqualified borrowers.
  3. John (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Great article, even trying to refinance with lower interest rates is difficult if you don't have sterling credit.
  4. Gerald (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Mr Roberts,



    Your article is very much to the point. "Fear" is in today's driver seat. The truth is, no one has a good handle on solving the problem at hand, thus, bits and pieces are slowly coming into play that should eventually develop into a workable road map that all may follow. The sad part of the story is the wake of debris created in the first place by the greedy. The "anything goes to close the deal" and "we'll worry about it later" attitude of the entire housing industry is now causing much pain and suffering. The industry buzz word was always caveat-emptor, aka, "screw the public; make all we can while this lasts and let's get ours while we can!" So, what else is new?
  5. Jacque (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    I had this article forwarded to me and ironically enough; do I not only agree, I recently wrote a similar article for commentary in our local newspaper. Unfortunately, we will have to go higher than the Vertice Mortgage company and other lenders since they simply follow the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guidelines in which they dictate out the requirements as well as the declining markets across our country. And I agree; by the lenders running scared, it only causes the few borrowers/buyers that COULD get approved to also run scared and back off of the real estate market.



    We have to stop killing our economy and actually FIX the problems...not try to bandage them or cut off all blood flow altogether.



    Article published Friday, April, 18, 2008:



    Simply google: "Jacque Georgia Mortgage Monopoly Under Way? in Green Bay Press Gazette, April 18, 2008"



    Sincerely,



    Jacque Georgia
  6. R.B. (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Ethan, much of your article rings true and we share the same perspective as far as the avalanche effect this debacle is having on other sectors of the economy. Unfortunately, the lenders are not setting the guidelines - everyone is underwriting to Fannie & Freddie's guidelines because they don't want to be stuck with loans unsaleable to the secondary market. Make no mistake about it, the mortgage part of the stimulus package did nothing for the consumer, homebuyer or homeownere trying to stay in their own house. It merely bailed out the banks and upstream investors caught with a lot of secondary market product unsaleable when the jumbo and Alt-A market collapsed (not even addressing subprime).

    The current environment for new mortgages isn't great but it's not all that bad as you have described it. As a mortgage broker (19 years) in California and in a declining market area, I actually have had little problem getting QUALIFIED borrowers approvals within 2-3 days and lenders are eager to push through good loans. Now, maximum leverage is a different thing. With the 5% LTV hit and a whole menu of risk-based pricing add-ons, the high LTV, lower credit score mortgage is going to be pricey, as it should be. This misconception that it is everyone's god-given right to own a home and have a mortgage has got to go! And it's now the Mortgage Insurance companies that are giving us the smackdown as they try to retool their guidelines to manage current losses and avoid future huge UW losses. Okay, so we're going back to the lending landscape of the late 80s/early 90s but without the high rates from then. This will be for a while until the mortgage industry, which has a very short memory, starts trusting the market again. As with many cycles within the Real Estate industry, this one will swing back to reason sooner rather than later. We're already starting to see some new subprime programs coming back. But what we won't see for a long time is the No Money Down, low credit score, stated income liar loans that created huge losses for investors and have just decimated the CMO/CDO market that was keeping the industry humming. As for the foreclosures, savvy investors are quietly and quickly snapping up the bargains and by the time those who are waiting for prices to drop another 20% wake up, we will already have hit bottom and on the way up again. Happens every time.

    Bob in Monterey, CA
  7. george (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Apparently the lenders want to eliminate the mortgage brokers and "loan originators" because the lastest legislation is attempting to lower the payment rates for these people, plus adding additional documentation to show the borrowers capability to pay the loan.
  8. Marty (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    THIS IS CONSTRUCTIVE THINKING, NOTHING ELSE!!!!

    GOOD DONE, ETHAN=(:->)
  9. chiachuen (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    The house price increased parabolically from 2000 to 2005(2006?) while the income increased modestly. Unless the Fed engineers an income inflation to match the increases in house price, how can you afford to buy a house at inflated price? Just like the stock market, when the technology stocks were bid to sky high, it crushed down eventually. Housing bubble is the same as tech bubble. By the way, we bought a house in central Florid in 2004, and the price jumped more than 40% in one year. Do you think we can sell the house now for the peak price of 2006 or the current market price? Supply and demand rules.
  10. Harry G (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Ethan all I

    can say is EXCELLANT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



    Harry G.

Add Your Comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed.

Please fill in the missing field(s).

Important: To comment on Tycoon Report articles, you must first log in. If you are a paying customer of Tycoon, you may use the same login and password that you use normally. If you do not yet have a login, please take a moment to register below. It’s free, and you only need to do it once.

Register

(email address and password information will NOT be displayed publicly)

Name *

Email *

Password *

Subscribe to The Tycoon Report
By registering, you agree to our terms of service.

Already a member? Log in!

(you will not be taken away from this page)

Email *

Password *

Remember?

Forgot Password?




Important Notice to all stock spammers, scammers and penny stock pump-and-dumpers: You will get no respect here. Don’t bother submitting fraudulent or misleading information in the guise of an article, because we will remove it. Any piece of content submitted on this site can be removed at the sole discretion of the Tycoon staff.