Digg It |   Del.icio.us |   Printer Friendly |   PDF |   Email

The Right Time to Buy Countrywide Financial Corp. (CFC)

Tuesday, November 13, 2007 | John M (jmicheline) Is this Spam?

Rating:

Countrywide Financial CORP. (NYSE: CFC) is offering investors the opportunity to buy a quality Fortune 500 company cheap, very cheap.

Buying low and selling high is a strategy most covet, but never truly understand how to accomplish. When the market creates buying opportunities, most investors shy away, scared off by the prospect of continued loss in the investment. The art of buying low and selling high is finding a quality company that has been beaten down by the market, but is ripe for a comeback.

Countrywide is presenting investors this opportunity. I know your first reaction is “yeah right, there is no way I am going to put my money into this mortgage meltdown.” As a Wall Street broker, I often heard that same response when I presented an opportunity like this one to my clients.

It’s a valid feeling. The problem is, feelings and emotions should have zero to do with investing. Investing is about buying quality companies cheap (unless you’re a day trader, but we are talking about investing). Warren Buffett has created an empire on this very principle.

There are three factors driving this particular stock down:

1. Their exposure to the sub-prime mess;

2. Third quarter losses the company reported;

3. An overall panic in the housing market.

The question is: Do these factors support this low valuation?

Right now CFC is trading at $13.60 per share after a down trend that began in May at $41.00. At today’s price, the valuation is less than a third of the 52-week high of $45.26 which was set in January.

The current valuation is not validated when looking at Countrywide’s overall position in the housing market. We’re talking about the largest mortgage lender in the country, originating $3 trillion in mortgage loans since 1969. This quarter, their mortgage loan portfolio continued to grow, reaching $1.47 trillion in October, an increase of $202 billion, or 16%, from October 2006.

Only 1% of all loans originated in Countrywide’s history have completed foreclosure. Of their sub-prime loans, the driving force behind the housing “crisis”, less than 4% are currently in default. This percentage truly puts Countrywide’s exposure into perspective.

Really beating down Countrywide’s stock was their reported net loss of $1.2 billion in the 3rd quarter of 2007. This was their first quarterly loss in 25 years ... safe to say an anomaly supplied by sub-prime woes. The troubles affecting Countrywide are industry broad, not a specific operating mistake of Countrywide itself, and seem to be part of a correction in the overall housing market.

Looking forward, losses accrued in the 3rd quarter are not re-accruing, as the company projects a profit in the fourth quarter of 2007 and throughout 2008. Countrywide is trading at a trailing P/E ration of 3.81, while Bank of America (BAC) is trading at a P/E of 10.46 and Fannie Mae (FNM) at 13.26.

Obviously, Countrywide is trading at a considerable discount to their direct competitors.
 

 
Countrywide has great management, and they are not sitting back waiting for the storm to blow over. Management is taking proactive actions to right the ship. In order to deal with the sub-prime issues, Countrywide has embarked on several ventures to help home borrowers maintain their payments and avoid default. They currently have $33.6 billion of “highly reliable liquidity” to help deal with housing defaults, and assigned 2,700 staff members to mitigate default losses.

Countrywide expects to cut foreclosures by 35% in 2007 from 2006. The company has shown consistent quality growth over the years, and I don’t believe that the management completely lost their ability to manage based on one quarter. 25 years without even one quarter of reported losses is pretty amazing, and a signal that the company will rebound.

Federal inquiries into Countrywide’s lending practices do not appear validated. The company has been lending since 1969, and embarked on a “we house America program” to fund $1 trillion in home loans to help lower income and minority individuals buy homes and acquire mortgages. In this program, Countrywide loaned $789 billion as of August 2007. They are the leading lender in home mortgages to all minorities, including African Americans, Asians, and Hispanics.

The company once championed for their efforts is now being demonized for their lending practices. In order to protect themselves going forward, Countrywide will “tighten underwriting guidelines and enhance controls,” requiring higher FICA scores from prospective borrowers. Tightened restrictions are a bad sign for lower income and minority homebuyers. Nevertheless, a stricter mortgage criterion is a positive sign for investors, as Countrywide will have substantially fewer sub-prime mortgages to worry about going forward.

Aside from their mortgage business, Countrywide has large revenue streams from other services and subsidiaries. For example, Countrywide is the third largest Federal Reserve Bank in the nation. Banking Operations' assets were $106 billion in October 2007, compared to $83 billion in October 2006.

Countrywide’s mortgage refinance division is sure to see an increase in business as the Fed continues to lower interest rates. Panic in the housing market -- which helped pummel Countrywide’s stock -- may also be a catalyst for lower interest rates, and in turn lay the groundwork for Countrywide’s comeback.

Of course, in the short term, Countrywide’s stock could remain volatile. I am not saying this is the lowest point to come, but the stock is cheap for a company of this quality. Countrywide may trade to $10, or even $9 in the short term. But from a technical standpoint, the stock does appear to have bottomed out.

Recall other leaders of their industries that nobody wanted:

Merrill Lynch (Symbol: MER), a Wall Street leader that dropped from around $55.00 to $15.00 in another financial “crisis” -- October 1998.

- Up 200% within 6 months. Today it’s at $57.00.

Yahoo Inc. (Symbol: YHOO), king of the web, from as high as $125.00, then dropped to $4.00 when the dot-com bubble burst -- October 2002.

- Up 1000% in 4 years. Today it’s at $26.10.

EMC Corp. (Symbol: EMC), leader of data storage that traded from around $104 to $4.00 -- October 2002.

- Up over 400% in recent weeks near $25.00. Today it trades at $19.72.

The list goes on, but my point is that nobody wanted to go near these industry leaders, which is why they were so cheap. The common denominator was that in each case investors were saying that “this is different.”

In 1 to 2 years, Countrywide’s stock could trade up to $26 easily, which would still be $20 off the 52-week high.

It takes a lot of guts to buy a stock getting hammered in a bear industry. The market presents opportunities, leaving it up to the sharp investor to have the guts to take advantage.

-- John Micheline



Rate this article
Thank you for your vote!

35 Comments

Post your own comment
  1. Harold (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    I wonder if Countrywide is really cheap. I read the opposite in a post from Aidis Zunde, who is short selling CFC:



    www.vestopia.com/Blogs/DirectorBlogEntry.aspx?postId=13878&piid=51
  2. Arohan (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    John M, do not think owning or not owning a stock makes any difference to how your recommendation should be interpreted. I would love to point out that the readers of this or any other investing blog are savvy enough to do their own due diligence. Disclosing your position is also purely voluntary but I think it should be understood by default that the authors have some interest in the stock they are writing about



    On a related topic, sorry to know you sold. I am still holding and I think the stock will do fine over the next few months to a year



    http://arohanvalue.blogspot.com
  3. John M (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Rick (John M) I am sorry you feel that way. What is the difference if I owned the stock or not? I dont know why you or anyone would feel duped. I owned the stock and sold the stock. I wrote article about why I was "buying the stock". But even if I didn’t own the stock i do not understand the difference. We are not talking about a penny stock that I owned and tried to get others to push the price up. I believe you would feel better about any recommendations I made when I owned them. Putting my money where my mouth is.

    But please Rick explain why i should have told others I owned the stock before writing about it? Do you believe that enough people read what i write to move a stock? I can tell you for fact that is not the case. What are you concerned about?



    John
  4. Rick (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Nice of you to post that you actually were holding the stock, but shouldn't you have disclosed that fact before you pimped it to the public?



    I can understand offering investment advice, but offering a rosy picture of a company under failing market conditions smacks of shilling. You've done your readers a disservice, and for that you should be rewarded with fewer readers. I'll be the first. Buh-bye.
  5. John M (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    To Everyone: from (John M).



    I sold my position after Fannie MAe and Freddie Mac released their numbers. Although I still be live in the compnay, the limitation on liquiditiy from Fannie and Freddy was eye opening to say the least. I lost roughly $4 per share. I will not take any more of a loss then that. Again not emotional, limit the loss. If Countrywide survives and makes a run up to 12 with a little more stability in the morgage industry I will jump back in.



    www.johnmicheline.blogspot.com
  6. Mark (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    ABC did a Nightline report last week, basically depicting CFC as a money hungry big corporation out to bilk the little guy by encouraging their brokers to sign up as many people as they could, regardless of their credit worthiness.



    While this is a ridiculous permise, it is one that resonates with the public. CFC came off as incompetent at best, totally evil at worst.



    If the mortgage troubles are as big as many believe, there will have to be a scapegoat, and CFC, as the largest mortgage company in the country, will probably be it.



    Here in the US, we don't simply forgive and forget. If hundreds of thousands of people are going be forced out of their homes because of poor brokerage practices, then some big corporation will have to take the fall.



    Right now, the target in squarely on CFC.
  7. Moky (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Economy path and CFC,

    Fiscal national policy is in shambles, government budget sustainbility is shaking, economic outlook is a conditional temporary recession. FED rate cuts are not the answer. Dollar value declines, tragically, are an international 75% taxation on US WEALTH!!! Export rise effects represent a drop in the bucket of US wealth losses. Consumers "run" to WMT and MCD are the symbols of recession and a sign of more trade deficit w/ China. Full employment represent transition from professional and technical to Wal-Mart and McDonald services, a shift in income distribution.

    Relativaly it's a scene of the 1930s standing in line for free soup.

    The only cure is : FISCAL RESPONSABLE POLICY, i.e. tightening the belt, Energy independence and oil taxation - Europe style.

    A FED cut will represent the most irresponsible policy.
  8. Ethan R (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Just to add to Arohan's note, two insiders at BAC bought 14,000 shares between them (about $636,000 total) a few weeks ago at prices between 45.13 and 45.50. So at the current price of 42.77, one can purchase at a better price than the insiders.
  9. Arohan (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    John, I completely agree with you. Most value/contrarian investors would be falling over themselves to buy CFC at this time. Yes, there is a risk of bankruptcy but the risk is very little and at today's prices (about $9.2 as I write) it would appear to me that CFC is probably the safest stock in the market in terms of risk/reward.



    Another stock to consider in the same vein is Washington Mutual, now trading at close to 5 PE and about 11% dividend yield. Even if they cut the dividend down by 50%, it is still an attractive yield. However when the business turns, the dividend will quickly get ratcheted up providing a very attractive yield on initial investment



    I also think BAC is a buy here



    I have written about Financials including countrywide at my blog http://arohanvalue.blogspot.com



    Take care

    Arohan
  10. Tom (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    As a novice first-time investor , I'm deeply appreciative of the advice given by the Tycoon staff , and also the various member comments. The more I read ,the more I realize that I am the one who is actually and finally accountable for my investing decisions.Therefore ,it behooves me to start my investing career with a solid groundwork of education on the subject in order to be able to evaluate varying opinions and ideas about a particular investment for myself. When it comes to the act of putting my money on the line , the buck stops here .

Add Your Comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed.

Please fill in the missing field(s).

Important: To comment on Tycoon Report articles, you must first log in. If you are a paying customer of Tycoon, you may use the same login and password that you use normally. If you do not yet have a login, please take a moment to register below. It’s free, and you only need to do it once.

Register

(email address and password information will NOT be displayed publicly)

Name *

Email *

Password *

Subscribe to The Tycoon Report
By registering, you agree to our terms of service.

Already a member? Log in!

(you will not be taken away from this page)

Email *

Password *

Remember?

Forgot Password?




Important Notice to all stock spammers, scammers and penny stock pump-and-dumpers: You will get no respect here. Don’t bother submitting fraudulent or misleading information in the guise of an article, because we will remove it. Any piece of content submitted on this site can be removed at the sole discretion of the Tycoon staff.