Digg It |   Del.icio.us |   Printer Friendly |   PDF |   Email

The Million Dollar Article...

Tuesday, December 18, 2007 | Jason Jovine

Rating:
If last week taught you or reinforced anything in your mind, it should have been that:

1)    The risk from your not being invested in the stock market is greater than your risk from being invested in the stock market.
2)    You must act now and get serious.
3)    You must be in the market - no ifs, ands or buts!

Why do I say this?  Let me explain...

INFLATION!

Last week, folks, the CPI (Consumer Price Index) was released for November, and prices jumped 4.3% from a year earlier, the highest jump since 2006.  The historical arithmetic average for inflation from 1926 until today has been over 3%.

What this means in layman’s terms is that one dollar today will get you approximately what ten cents would get you in 1926.  Do you remember when your father or grandfather used to tell you that a dollar isn’t what it used to be?  He was talking about inflation.

Now, last time I checked, here is what a bank is paying you in some basic “Average Joe” accounts (this is courtesy of www.bankrate.com):



Now, as you can see, the banks are paying you, on average, a little over 3% on all of these types of accounts.  The bottom line is that you are effectively breaking even by keeping your money in a bank, and it is likely to get even worse.

Why?

Because we are in a global economy, folks, and as countries such as China and India continue to develop, and many millions of their people join the middle class, they will want middle class things.  They will want foods like meat and milk over rice alone.  They will want nice cars that require oil.  Just to name a few.

Remember that China has about 1.3 billion people, and India has over 1 billion.  Those two countries alone account for about a third of the entire world’s population.  Since it is the holiday season, look at where the toys that you are buying for your children are made, and chances are, it will say China.

We have outsourced roughly all of our manufacturing to this part of the world, and we are primarily a service economy now.

Inflation was kept at bay for a very long time in the 1990s and the first several years of this decade, as well.  It was kept at bay because the labor there was very cheap, and the people were very poor.  Our corporations were able to produce goods there for a fraction of the cost that it would cost them to pay Americans here.

They passed some of these savings on to the American people, but, in my opinion, much of it went into the pockets of many a greedy executive.

Now things are changing.  The people in these countries are starting to demand higher salaries for their work.  They are entering the middle class, and the bottom line is now they are competing for goods and services with everyone else.  (Americans are no exception.)

This results in inflation.  It is simple supply and demand.  The demand for goods is far outstripping the supply, and it is likely to continue.

You must, I repeat, must be invested in the market as a hedge, at the very least.  Because while these countries send the prices of the goods higher, our corporations will sell our goods to them which they will buy (comparative advantage), and this will come back as profits and dividends to the owners of these corporations; hence, their stock prices should appreciate.

Trade is good; unfettered trade is not.

The comparative advantage story...

As a simple example of comparative advantage, say there are two people stranded on an island in the middle of nowhere.  One guy, call him Dick (D), is the stronger of the two and has an absolute advantage over the other person that he is stuck on the island with.  Call the other guy Clay (C).

Say that Dick can chop down 10 trees an hour and capture 5 lobsters per hour.  Say Clay can chop down 5 trees per hour and capture 5 lobsters per hour.

Of course, each person must choose one activity or the other at any given time.  In other words, if Dick chops down 10 trees in an hour, he can’t collect lobsters and vice versa, etc.

Now, would it make sense for Dick to be a loner and go to his own side of the island and for Clay to do the same?  Or would it make sense for them to trade with one another?

Here is what would happen in the space of two hours if they did not trade with one another:



As you can see, the total production of trees is 15, and the total production of lobsters is 10.

Now let’s see what happens when they trade with one another (e.g. comparative advantage):



As you can see, they are both better off.  They are now producing 20 trees and 10 lobsters.  When they each focus on what they are better at doing, or when at least one focuses on what he is better off doing, they are both, as a whole, better off.

Of course, the assumption here is that they don’t absolutely despise each other.  If they did, then they may not care about the increase in goods because it bothers them to deal with the other person so much.

Now the aforementioned example is just a basic one.  It lets you know that holding all other factors, or, as they say in Latin, “ceteris paribus”, trade is good for all parties involved.

Trade is good with the exceptions of certain externalities that this increased economic activity brings about such as pollution, global warming, and what will certainly be inevitable conflicts over the world’s scarce resources.  The conflicts in the Middle East are just the beginning.

The stock market…

The stock market as represented by the S&P has averaged approximately 12% per year.  This means that, ceteris paribus, if you invest, for example, $100,000 today in the market, it should be worth almost $1,000,000 in about twenty years.  This is if you just passively invest your money in “the market”.

If you want better returns than 12%, then you must get committed and motivated to do so.  You cannot make excuses like, “Learning about the market is too difficult”, or “It is too time consuming.”
 
Don’t be your own worst enemy...

Until the next time, folks, spend your hard-earned money wisely.


(Please let us know what you think about Jason Jovine's article.)
Rate his article here »



Jason Jovine
Contributing Editor
The Tycoon Report


Rate this article
Thank you for your vote!

11 Comments

Post your own comment
  1. rssky22 (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    After reading a few more comments I would like to add that inflation is live and well. GDP eroniously includes transactions from debt, removal of equity from housing where most people store their wealth, and spending from a negative savings rate. People are receiving the same thing for their money and they are spending down their rainy day funds to do it.

    Federal data and a harvard study indicate families are making less than their parents in 1970 adjusted for inflation. It costs a lot more to lauch a child into the middle class now. The five main areas of increased spending (not necessarily in order) are housing, health care, education, taxes, and automobiles. Housing, health care and taxes speak for themselves. Automobiles are because now we need two because two family earners are required to be on par, and now education requires college and likely day care and other educational costs to be in the middle class. The middle class is disappearing, it's just going to be people who are financially stable and people who aren't.

    I've never been a bear but it is obvious the rest of the world is kicking the stuffing out of us. When analysts say buy U.S. international blue chips it isn't because they primarily make stuff here and ship it.

    I think I read someone saying buying an equity is loaning money to a company. Bolderdash. The underwriter fabricates a price for the IPO does a dog and pony show and then it's off to the races. If that company goes to zero you lose. Practically speaking you don't have any rights. Stocks are trading vehicles, commodities unto themselves, priced based upon what professionals understand to be their rules of the risk game. To quote a name I can't remember "Rational people taking money away from irrational people". I also concur that the 12% or 10% average talk is sales speak for mutual fund salesman who are reading the pamphlet as they hand it to you. Albeit everyone does need a baseline against which to measure performance. Statistics are always interpreted to evidence whatever point we want to make. If you were strictly S&P 500 for that last 7 years +/- you haven't made a penny and you are entering the next down turn. Those axioms don't apply any more.
  2. rssky22 (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Trade is commerce by any other name, it is only called trade when someone wants to add a political border and border related agenda into the conversation.



    Your article bypasses the real picture. The national debt is your debt and mine. We (U.S.A) consumers in recent years have been really good at going into debt spending money we don't have and our federal government is more than glad to export our debt. The national debt is a monkey on our backs. Someday the bill has to be paid. 25% inflation from a 25% crashing of the dollar is no reason to celebrate a reduced trade deficit.



    Interesting how foreign governments invest (here) to compound their revenue (beating us at our own game), while our country only compounds our debt and then people cheer. (And oh yeah the US govt has spent the social security fund and replaced it with an IOU which was really our money, which means we have to pay back the money we already paid on top of the regular payment). Let free market capitalism let the markets float. But for goodness sakes this government spending is out of conrtol. 1/3 of recent job creation statistics were government, isn't there something wrong with that?
  3. Bruce (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Being in the insurance and investment business as a broker and consultant, I cringe every I hear or see in print "Oh, the market has averaged 12% per year (or whatever), and if you had invested X dollars ($) in year 1, you'd have Y dollars ($$$$) now". The market doesn't do average!! This is such folly, I can't contain my distain. Please don't mislead people with these irresponsible comments.



    Sincerely,



    Bruce Ewing
  4. Ken (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    John M,

    Thanks for those links. Do you have the Science of Getting Rich? I have Wattles book and I've just ordered their course. Its very inexpensive and I think I like their approach. Identifying talent, building skills, meditation and guided imagery. I know these subjects and they have always worked well for me.

    Ken
  5. Luther (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Good 5 Star article Jason! Your little island analogy was like good vegetables for the mind, healthy for consumption.

    I read some of the more esoteric comments concerning the global economy, etc..

    However, I invest in the market because for one thing, my dollar today will be less tomorrow unless I can find a medium in which my dollar can reproduce itself.

    This is my simple reality and I embrace it. Thanks again for your insight.
  6. John M (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    If you really want to get rich go to :

    http://www.scienceofgettingrichnow.com/

    If you want to learn why FED central banking will impoverish you go to:

    http://www.mises.org/



    Those of you who are die hards will die poor. But, you will feel intellectually superior to the likes of me and Mises. Good trade? The reward of living is dying. The reward of living is dying well. Everyone dies.



    John Mahler
  7. John M (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Good Morning Jason,

    Great insight to the evils of inflation. I never thought of inflation as an incentive to invest, but in an inflationary economy, I suppose it makes sense. I guess no one works for underlying value anymore. We are all so impressed with zeros. I guess if one had only currency to use as fire starter it would make one feel better starting a fire with $50.00 bills than $1.00 bills. I just can't help recalling that ancient Chinese mantra O WHA TA ASS SIAM. Say it ten times real fast and see if your eyes leak enough light of reality that you see your face reflected in the folly of FED monetary oversight. LOL Hey, sounds like you might need a little loosening up. You'll get a hitch in your neck and a tension headache if you don't slack a bit. Check this out! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8VkqoiPvDg

    I'm just playing with you! Have a great week.

    John Mahler
  8. John M (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Not sure that we have outsourced all of our manufacturing. We still manufacture over $1.5T and export almost $1T. http://www.nam.org/s_nam/bin.asp?CID=202325&DID=233605&DOC=FILE.PDF
  9. jester112358 (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    There's a problem with extrapolating the historic ~12% return into the future. World capital markets are hopelessly overvalued compared to GDP (i.e. productivity) growth. By the factor of roughly 7 to 1 (CIA figures). In other words, like housing, they are overvalued and their prices inflated. And we are witnessing now what happens to overvalued collateral. Buffet has guessed future returns will be more in the 5-6% area and I concur.



    When you buy an equity you are loaning the company funds and you need a true productivity gain every year to justify the price you pay.



    Here's what a recent article from seeking alpha had to say on this subject:



    "The data tend to suggest that either GDP is essentially irrelevant to stock market returns, that the data show the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer, or that markets are out of equilibrium with fundamental economics" (unrealistic expectations).



    My opinion is the markets are out of equilibrium and I have very good company is this opinion, namely George Soros (read his book the "The Crisis in Global Capitalism").



    "It’s easy to understand how money and wealth can shift from one corner of the world to the other, but it’s hard to understand how the value of all markets can grow so much faster than all economies."



    "In the same way that house prices cannot perpetually grow faster than wages, isn’t it reasonable to assume that world stock markets cannot perpetually grow faster than world economies?"



    Isn't this the same as saying "there's no free lunch"? Finally, in my opinion, investing is not a fundamentally productive activity. Only real production of goods and services qualifies. So, get a good education and real profession if you want steady income-don't depend on market returns based upon the "greater fool theory" of asset pricing, because you might end up being the greater fool.

    I say this as a long time market participant-but not with the money I need for living expenses.
  10. jj (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    "Inflation was kept at bay for a very long time in the 1990s and the first several years of this decade, as well."



    I don't think so.Are you aware of housing prices during this period.Do you really want to believe govt inflation figures that aren't figured the same way they were in the Jimmy Carter days.Inflation now and in the past has been much higher than govt figures.How do you think the DOW went from 850 in 1982 to 14,000?How about housing up 300% in So California?How about soaring energy and grain prices?There is a website which gives honest inflation and other statistics.If you are too rich to pay attention to prices you pay then you need some help from other than govt sources.Here is a good website to get yourself up on what's happening with the U.S. currency.In a country in decline you can expect it's common stock(U.S. Dollar) to also decline.



    http://www.shadowstats.com/cgi-bin/sgs?

Add Your Comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed.

Please fill in the missing field(s).

Important: To comment on Tycoon Report articles, you must first log in. If you are a paying customer of Tycoon, you may use the same login and password that you use normally. If you do not yet have a login, please take a moment to register below. It’s free, and you only need to do it once.

Register

(email address and password information will NOT be displayed publicly)

Name *

Email *

Password *

Subscribe to The Tycoon Report
By registering, you agree to our terms of service.

Already a member? Log in!

(you will not be taken away from this page)

Email *

Password *

Remember?

Forgot Password?




Important Notice to all stock spammers, scammers and penny stock pump-and-dumpers: You will get no respect here. Don’t bother submitting fraudulent or misleading information in the guise of an article, because we will remove it. Any piece of content submitted on this site can be removed at the sole discretion of the Tycoon staff.