Digg It |   Del.icio.us |   Printer Friendly |   PDF |   Email

How to Profit From Inflation

Wednesday, April 16, 2008 | Teeka Tiwari

Rating:
Editor's Note:  This week's conversation with Teeka is complete and ready for download.  Listen now to hear ...
  • Whether credit card debt will be the next "shoe to drop"
  • Why Blockbuster's offer for Circuit City boggles Teeka's mind
  • His near-term outlook for oil
  • Several alternative energy ETF plays
Click Here to Listen >>

$113 oil - WOW! There is no sugar coating how spectacularly bad $113 a barrel oil is for corporate earnings. The Producer Price Index, also known as the PPI, tracks inflation at the wholesale level. Recently, we saw huge jumps in the prices that businesses are paying for raw materials. Most companies will not be able to absorb these costs. They will have to be passed onto consumers at some point, and those price hikes will show up in the Consumer Price Index, also know as the CPI.

Inflation is here my friends. The government can ex out food and energy all they want. I don’t need a PHD in economics to figure that out. A quick trip to the grocery store will tell me all I need to know. Inflation kills stock prices because it compresses corporate margins. If corporate margins are down, earnings are down and if earnings are down, stock prices are down.

Now don’t misunderstand me. I am not suggesting that it’s game over for the stock market - far from it. What I am saying is that it appears that we are stuck in what is essentially a sideways market. A market that is range bound. In 2000, the DOW hit 12,000. Eight years later it's at 12,300. The S&P 500 hit 1526 in 2000; it's now at 1,328.

In the interim we’ve had some terrific trading opportunities, but they were range bound plays. For eight years we have not experienced a net new meaningful rally in two indexes that 87% of all mutual fund money is tied to. In fact, if you have not been an adept sector player, your profit making opportunities have been slim indeed. The poor buy and hold S&P 500 index investor has been slaughtered over the last 8 years.

My point is that the game has changed. Anybody born from 1965 onward has never experienced the type of market that we currently find ourselves in. Think about that. That’s an awful lot of dumb money running around managing your money!

Most professional money managers (I’m talking about the mutual fund guys here) have just not yet adapted to this market. These managers came from a 20 year run where all you had to do was index your way to billions in fees. Those days are done, finito. Maybe they will be back in another 8-12 years. But if you are using the DOW and S&P 500 indexing as a method to fund anything, you are fighting a war with bow arrows while everyone else has sub-machine guns.

You just can’t win.

While the rest of the world scrapes through the investment tea leaves looking for the bottom in financial stocks the smart money has been quietly busy at work in many other areas of the market.

You must position your investments for where we are now, like the smart money is doing, not where we’ve been. Remember: 87% of all mutual fund assets are correlated to the S&P 500. That’s a lot of mediocrity going on with your money.

You want to start looking for sectors that will do well regardless of inflation or general economic malaise. You want to be looking at food companies, oil and oil service stocks, fertilizer stocks, agriculture equipment makers, steel, precious metals, foreign currencies, utilities, and direct ownership in commodities. Corn, sugar, wheat, soy etc… If you don’t have a strategy for gaining exposure to these sectors, your current wealth is going to be ravaged by inflation, and your future wealth could fail to materialize.

I know that we are conditioned to focus on the DOW and the S&P 500. I also know that if we get any type of a decent number from Citigroup, JP Morgan or Merrill this week we could have a very nice run in both indexes. That’s great, but that’s not where the real money is being made right now.

Right now you must start taking a long hard look at sectors like the food and beverage group and the utilities. These are two sectors that are just beginning to get ready to run. They also happen to be great safe haven areas in times of uncertainty, like now. During difficult economic times, these stocks can gun much higher.

ETFs are a great way to play this space if you are unsure which stocks to buy. However, be careful of the Utility ETFs. I’ve noticed a lot of poorly performing stocks are packed into them. This is one sector where you will probably be better served by individual stock ownership.

 Some Food/Beverage ETFs that warrant your attention include

•    iShares DJ US Consumer Non-Cyclical Sector - IYK
•    Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund - XLP
•    PowerShares Dynamic Consumer Staples Sector - PSL
•    PowerShares FTSE RAFI Consumer Goods Sector - PRFG
•    Powershares Dynamic Food and Beverage - PBJ
•    Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF - VDC
•    Rydex S&P Equal Weight Consumer Staples - RHS
•    Market Vectors Agribusiness ETF - MOO


As a general rule, if you are going the individual stock route you are going to want to focus on companies that sell internationally. These companies will receive a nice earnings boost when they translate their income from foreign currencies back into US Dollars. This is because, in all likelihood, the US Dollar will continue to trend lower.

I cannot imagine a scenario where I would want to own a mutual fund over an ETF. It just doesn’t make sense. The fees of a mutual fund, coupled with their archaic trading nature, makes them awful investment vehicles. You want liquidity, you want the immediate ability to buy, sell, short, or trade options on any sector at anytime. The only investment vehicle I know of that allows you to do all of that without taking on individual company risk are ETFs.


(Please let us know what you think about Teeka Tiwari's article.)
Rate his article here »

“Let the Game Come to You.”

Teeka Tiwari
Chief Investment Officer
Point & Profit




Rate this article
Thank you for your vote!

6 Comments

Post your own comment
  • Most recent
  • 1
  • Oldest
  1. Lois (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    I did end up researcing the ETF's that were listed and would only consider two of them; XLP and VDC which were also rated by morningstar. On morningstar VDC has a .22% expense ratio and a 3 year 9.52% market return. XLP has a .23% expense ratio and a 5 year market return of 10.13%. The rest of the ETF's I was not impressed with and also have not been in existence long enough to really research yet.



    Now in researching mutual funds I came across USAGX USAA precious Metals & Minerals mutual fund which has a 1.21% expense ratio but has a 10 year annualized return of 22.48%. Also found VGENX Vanguard Energy mutual fund which has an expense ratio of .25% and a 10 year annualized return of 17.35%. Am I missing something on why I would want to choose an ETF over one of these mutual funds? Am I figuring something wrong? Also I do not know anything about options as of yet but plan on it eventually. I also don't know too much about ETF's other than the fact you can trade them like stock.
  2. Trevor (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Great comments Teeka.

    A question from an Australian client for your next session.

    What do you think will happen to the RIO shareprice if the BHP proposal is rejected? I'm buying six month RIO puts!

    Trevor Naylor
  3. jester112358 (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Spot on analysis, Teeka! Indexing and sector weighting by market cap is a way to the poor house. This is a stock/sector pickers market where you want to be heavily weighted in Ag, oil & oil services, metals (and the companies producing them with large margins and near monopolies) and foreign currencies. I would also add shipping which should show huge increases in earnings in the next year. All financial and consumer stocks are a diaster in terms of future earnings.



    Of course, I could be guilty of "confirmational bias" since I am so heavily weighted in all the sectors you mentioned. But great minds think alike.



    Keep up the great advice and analysis of macroeconomic trends. Your readers will continue to benefit. I could also advise them to read "money magazine" and do the opposite!
  4. John (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Wow - that is a harsh but true message. Thank you for telling it like it is. No wonder the general public thinks the stock market is too confusing and options are too risky. No wonder all the money went into real estate the last 10 years. Now that party is over, and we investors have to be dilligent and intelligent. Thank you for this important and upbeat message. It will be hard times for those who do not take heed and change their ways.
  5. Scott (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    better than excellent, thank you teeka,
  6. Charles (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Excellent
  • Most recent
  • 1
  • Oldest

Add Your Comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed.

Please fill in the missing field(s).

Important: To comment on Tycoon Report articles, you must first log in. If you are a paying customer of Tycoon, you may use the same login and password that you use normally. If you do not yet have a login, please take a moment to register below. It’s free, and you only need to do it once.

Register

(email address and password information will NOT be displayed publicly)

Name *

Email *

Password *

Subscribe to The Tycoon Report
By registering, you agree to our terms of service.

Already a member? Log in!

(you will not be taken away from this page)

Email *

Password *

Remember?

Forgot Password?




Important Notice to all stock spammers, scammers and penny stock pump-and-dumpers: You will get no respect here. Don’t bother submitting fraudulent or misleading information in the guise of an article, because we will remove it. Any piece of content submitted on this site can be removed at the sole discretion of the Tycoon staff.