Digg It |   Del.icio.us |   Printer Friendly |   PDF |   Email

Profit from the Bailout Bloodbath!

Tuesday, September 30, 2008 | Chris Rowe

Rating:
AH!

Thank goodness I get to write on TUESDAYS for Tycoon. I get to share my analysis of the 6.5% - 10.5% massacre in the market (6.5% for the Dow 30 and 10.5% for the NASDAQ 100). A truly historic time to be writing about the market. AWESOME!

A short rant, and then some advice on how to handle this market...

Okay, forget taking sides in politics. When are these idiots gonna stop using this super bowl of politically and economically aligned stars to plug their party?

You want to know who to blame? It's not just Democrats or Republicans. It's humans. (Mostly humans who are democrats, but you get my point - just kidding.)

No, the problem is politics as a whole. There is no single event or decision from either side that caused this. We're talking about 30 years of decisions and fighting that led up to this mess.

Politics got the economy in this mess. Politicians on the payrolls of major lenders and banks, politicians looking for votes, politicians wanting to avoid accountability - it's all the same thing, and it's not any one party. It's short-term thinking.

Of course, I would rather live in the U.S. than China (no offense to China - I heard I'd get treated like Brad Pitt there so you're not far down my list), but when you think of the long-term perspective of China as a country that is more interested in building Dynasties than pleasing voters every couple of years, there's a lot we can learn about ourselves.

In the U.S. we have major elections every 24 months. Therefore, it's difficult for politicians to cross party lines, or take a stand for what's best for our country because they are more focused on keeping power, votes, or taking care of the special interest group that's paying their way through lobbyists. Republicans overspent so much of our tax money because of this, a big reason why we have this enormous deficit. It weakens our dollar, and that causes commodity prices to go up, among other things. Both parties are guilty of this, I know - believe me I'm certainly not taking the left side here.

Both parties make mistakes and that's fine. I chose the party that I think understands economics better, personally. But 90% of mistakes made by either party are made because they are pressured one way or another by money or votes. It's sickening - Democrat or Republican you've GOT to admit this. 

Another thing that sickens me is we are witnessing one of the craziest economic times we'll ever see, and with the free flow of information, this is truly something our youngsters can read about or watch, real time, and at the very least get a serious education on it.  But they have to digest it from such a jaded perspective, which is a real gyp because politicians are using this as an opportunity to have a giant food fight at YOUR expense. 

So I'll end the rant portion here, but it's disgusting how we are going to watch two parties fight their way to our next generation's death. We'll get through this, but scars will definitely be visible for a very long time. Talk about a real shame.

Use this Options Strategy to Profit

Plain and simple. The key thing to remember here is that markets filled with such emotion cause rational people to do irrational things. That means the smartest money managers in the world are going to make stupid moves. Times like these are the times savvy investors wait years for. 

All you have to do is be cool. If you don't feel comfortable, take a portion (not all) of your money out and sit on the sidelines.  Don't worry about missing something. It's more important to be cool and profit from the people who are more worried about missing something. You can only be cool when you are comfortable and if that means selling some stock to attain a level head, then do it. 

Here's a quick lesson on using options to make a profit or ease the pain: When markets are fearful, options are expensive.  When markets are complacent, options are cheap. You don't have to own them in order to sell them. What's great about them is you can create them out of thin air! And now's the time to do it!

In a market like this one, options are VERY expensive. That means you can get LOTS of money for selling them. 

[Editor's Note: Chris Rowe's recent Trend Rider recommendations are up 35.5%, 43.6%, and 70% while the markets are bleeding. We're celebrating the Trend Rider's third anniversary. Get a no-risk, special introductory price for a limited time now.]

It's called "writing" an option. This is also known as "selling an option to open".  If you haven't done this yet, then you are probably close to deleting this e-mail because; who wants to try something new in a market like this one? But WAIT - don't leave yet. I've got a real simple gimme for you - it's very easy to do. 

If you decide the market dropped too far too fast, and you want to buy stocks, then you shouldn't do it. Instead, you should sell (write) naked puts as a way to get into the stock. When you sell naked puts, instead of buying a stock, you actually have someone PAYING YOU to buy the stock. So instead of buying 1,000 shares of XYZ for $30.00, someone might pay you $3,000.00 for the right to sell you 1,000 shares of XYZ at $30.00. Why would someone pay you $3,000.00 for the right to sell you a stock at $30.00 when the stock is already at $30.00?

You see, now, you're profiting by taking advantage of other people's emotions!

It's nice to be on this side of the table, huh?

I'll give you the quick gist of it and you can read more if you want. Selling naked puts holds LESS RISK than buying a stock. (If you are trying to remember what you heard is the riskiest thing you can do, you're probably thinking about the time someone told you not to sell naked CALLS).

Here's how selling naked puts works: Basically, if the stock trades up - you make money. If the stock trades sideways - you make money. If the stock trades down, you might still make money, or you may be down, but  down by a lesser amount than if you just went out there and bought the stock outright. 

In this case, sticking with the above example, the stock would likely be "put" to you or sold to you at $30.00. But at least you were paid $3,000.00 for the transaction so you've actually committed $27,000.00 to the stock!

Interested yet? Well on January 23rd, I wrote an article titled "Selling Naked Puts - A Great Way to Buy Battered Stocks!"

I wrote that article when the market was right about.......

Selling naked puts is a great way to buy battered stocks.

I'm not saying that I think the market will pop right away like it did the last time I wrote about the strategy. But I'm saying it makes even more sense to use the strategy today because options are more expensive.

One important note about using this strategy:
Options, like stocks, have a bid and an ask. So the put option may be trading at $3.00 bid, $3.80 ask.  hen you sell the put option to open, (when you sell the naked put option) be sure to enter a "limit order" at a price right in the middle. In other words, in the example I just used, enter the trade as a limit order to sell the put at $3.40.

So click here to read the article I'm talking about if you're interested. If not, you can still feel free to rant and rave in the comments section about what a mess politicians helped to make. You can show if you are fair and objective and not blindly listening to one party of the other, or you can show if you're one sided and completely deny the fact that both parties played some role in this.

You can argue with each other too! (How exciting!)  But please keep it clean and classy and for goodness' sake, argue based on statistical fact and not just based on what your favored party is saying TODAY.

See ya next Tuesday.

PS: I hope you're watching my market wrap up videos every Monday afternoon at www.thetycoonreport.com.


(Please let us know what you think about Chris Rowe's article.)
Rate his article here »

“Profit from the Trend”

Chris Rowe
Chief Investment Officer
The Trend Rider


Rate this article
Thank you for your vote!

26 Comments

Post your own comment
  1. Roy (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    "IN THE NAME OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING WE HAVE DAMAGED THE ENTIRE GLOBAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTION. WAY TO GO!"



    Let's not forget that it was the Dems who created this mess when they started making banks loan money to low-income people who could NOT afford to buy a house. This mess has been festering since the mid 1990's.
  2. Larry (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    John, I'm not going to debate the facts any more then I already have. However, the facts that you say are "my facts," are already in the history books, and will be recorded there forever. Yes, the banks were, and are, already in trouble, but to say that Monday's vote didn't cause further harm and future damage is like putting your head under the pillow and hoping that everything is the same as it was before the vote when you wake up. Face it! It happened! It was a dumb decision, it was irresponsible, and it did do further future damage, which we will see down the line. The bail out, more then likely, will be passed Thursday, and we both know that this is not going to stop the flow of blood. The problems are not going to go away, but I still say that Monday was an unnecessary burden that was put on this country, that will have lasting affects. It could have been avoided, but it wasn't, mostly because of politics. Instead of showing maturity, and trying to work the problem out, the congress acted like kids fighting over who sits in the front seat of the car. It was DUMB finger pointing politics.
  3. John M (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    I love BUSH but I have to disagree with the way he has dealt with this entire financial fiasco, and this new bailout plan. He should have let Fannie and Freddie swim with the fishes.



    He should have let the Paraná pick apart AIG and take what was left and quality. They should have done away with Bear Sterns altogether and Merrill Lynch for that matter. Bear and Merrill have been ripping us off for years with their private placements and favorable recommendations on crap stocks. If a Investment bank goes out of Business because of their poor investment, then they deserve it.



    Then when everything was in turmoil the politicians would have to explain to the voters why they forced banks to give out sub-prime loans and then bought these terrible loans with taxpayer money and resold them as CMO's to the entire world financial institutions.



    IN THE NAME OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING WE HAVE DAMAGED THE ENTIRE GLOBAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTION. WAY TO GO!



    But if you think this is bad wait till OBAMA becomes president and he raises taxes, thats going to help our economy so much I cant wait, can you.
  4. John M (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Larry those are your facts. In my facts banks and financial institutions have been faltering for months, this is why they want/need the bailout. Thats like saying Washington Mutual Failed because they didnt pass the bail out. THESE INSTITUTIONS WERE ALREADY FAILING. The denied plan didnt cause anything. Nothing in our economy is different today from yesterday yet yesterday the market was down almost 800, today up $500. Its all mania and pure speculation.



    Remember the European (name skipping my mind) failed before the bailout vote was announced.



    I can almost guarantee after the bailout the markets will be up for a couple days and then it will all be down again. They have been bailing out these financial institution's for months now and the problems didnt go away. IE: Bear Sterns, AIG, Fannie and Freddie. Did you forget about those? So when this further bailout happens its all going to be rosy? I doubt it!
  5. RAD (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Just to set the record straight, John M & Hausmann, the measure was defeated despite support on both sides. Sounds like, according to the report, that it was John Q. Public who rallied to send a message to their congressmen and women.

    To quote an online news source:

    "The bill's defeat in the jaw-dropping House floor vote came despite furious personal lobbying by Bush and support from House leaders of both parties. But the legislation was highly unpopular with the public, ideological groups on the left and the right organized against it, and Bush no longer wielded the influence to leverage tough votes. Even pressure in favor of the bill from some of the biggest special interests in Washington, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Realtors, could not sway enough votes."

    And this from Fox News, no less.

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,430462,00.html
  6. jester112358 (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    I think we can all be somewhat relieved that the bailout didn't occur. However, Bush and the Democratic house leadership still want the American people to buy debt that the private market won't touch. So, we all need to contact our representatives to make sure that doesn't happen. Remember, if there is no market for this debt, why do we want to own it? We've already got too much debt and reliance on credit in this economy which is why we're in trouble in the first place. Don't give a drug addict more drugs it won't help!







    On the subject of selling naked PUTS. Obviously one would need to have the capital to actually buy the stock in order to do this and one would only want to do this on a stock with good fundamentals. So, why not simply set a target price below the current market price and go bottom fishing by putting out a low ball bid, say 10-20% below current market. The premium you collect from selling a PUT, typically 2-5% of the stock price, would be less than this low-ball price. And on a day like yesterday a conditional buy (conditioned on the market dropping say 300 points) would also give you a better price with less risk. Actually did this on FRO and got a very nice price. Of course, if the stock appreciates you get to keep the premium by selling the PUTS which seems like free money but if you buy the stock at a bargin and the stock appreciates you also get to keep the profit. So, I don't believe buying naked calls or selling naked puts is really the way to acquire stocks though I have do this in the past. Better to use limit or conditional orders to get bargins. And then you don't have to watch the markets so closely-takes the emotion out.







    Comments Chris?
  7. Larry (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    John, I agree with everything you stated, except for my being caught up in the hype. It's FACT that yesterdays vote caused a global affect. And, it's obvious that if we stay on the same course as Monday, that it could, and probably will, lead to a world wide disaster, that may take many months, if not years, to recover from. Many retirees are not as fortunate as I am. I can afford a long term financial hit, but unfortunately most seniors will not survive a lasting, huge blow like we experienced Monday. That was my point. We want to punish the politicians, and teach them a lesson, at the expense of our seniors. I don't think so. Not a good strategy no matter how you cut the cake.
  8. Stanley (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    I am talking about rewriting those ARM's that reset from 4-5 percent to 8-10 per cent or more! And then there were the low rate "interest only" short term mortgages that became impossible to refinance in today's market. If possible, some of these people should be able to re-finance at normal market rates and not the predatory rates we are hearing about as the cause of the forclosure crisis.



    Yes there were people who spent their home equity to the max, then the falling markets made it impossible to refinance because they now owed more than their house was worth. For these people foreclosure is inevitable and no taxcpayer money will help.



    But there are those who were suckered into deals by unscupulous mortgage brokers who peddled inflated appraisals to the banks, got their commission at the closing and are not accountable for their fraud.



    How about the wall streeters who packaged this diseased paper as bonds to be sold to the retirement funds and are nowhere to be found when they went south? Such people should be found and held accountable, just like the Enron thieves.



    These are the situations that Joe Courtney (D-CT)wants addressed in the re-write of the bill. While I am a Republican, I support Joe's determination to hold Wall Street accountable and do something for Main street.
  9. John M (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    See Larry they got you, you have been caught in the hype. They have you believing their will be a global meltdown. In reality the markets are just weeding out the bad money. I dont know but the markets didnt go to zero today and the world is still here.



    My point was that we need accountability today so we dont have to go through this again. If their are no consequences then what will stop the politicians from doing it again? I ama a person that likes to deal with things now and work them out then let them go on and keep making the same mistakes. We are not bailing out banks here we are bailing out politicians. Politicians forced banks through the community reinvestment program to lend to sub-prime lenders. It is the politicians that need the bailout.



    Wall Steeet will work it self out the last thing we need is more political help. Did you here these moroons on TV yesterday? They no ZERO about the economy that why we are here. One ex-politician said "they burnt Thanksgiving dinner and now they want to cook Christmas supper"



    And us morons are like "yeah I love burnt food, just keep on burning it". Lets get these incompetents away from our money please thank you. Leaving politics out of economics couldn't be any worse then what they did.



    I dont know about you but Im tired of paying the price to help minorities and the underclass. We need to help them but not at the financial stability of the entire nation. I grew up with nothing but I can still see that every time politicians try and help they hurt the poor. IE, welfare, housing project, sub-prime loans, on and on.



    They need to stop giving the poor money and help then earn it.
  10. Stanley (1 year ago) Is this Spam?

    Joe Courtney (D-Ct) was the only CT congressman to vote against the bill. He spent last weekend reading the proposed bill so knew what had been agreed by the bi-partisn comittee. When the bill came to the floor for discussion and vote he KNEW what was supposed to be there. He said the taxpayer safeguards had been so watered down by staffers that they were meaningless posturing and the taboo golden parachutes and pofits of the perpetrators of this collossal banking fraud remained intact. Thus he voted NO.



    Seems to me he was right in opposing this Ponzi scheme! A bad bill is worse than no bill. He is working to restore the taxpayer safeguards and force a writedown of the actual retail mortgage for the poor mortgagee homeowner by the benficiary bank whose mortgages are being purchased under the bill. This benefits main street and not the unscrupulous hedge funds on Wall street.



    It seems to me that America in general would benefit, not only Wall Street.

Add Your Comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed.

Please fill in the missing field(s).

Important: To comment on Tycoon Report articles, you must first log in. If you are a paying customer of Tycoon, you may use the same login and password that you use normally. If you do not yet have a login, please take a moment to register below. It’s free, and you only need to do it once.

Register

(email address and password information will NOT be displayed publicly)

Name *

Email *

Password *

Subscribe to The Tycoon Report
By registering, you agree to our terms of service.

Already a member? Log in!

(you will not be taken away from this page)

Email *

Password *

Remember?

Forgot Password?




Important Notice to all stock spammers, scammers and penny stock pump-and-dumpers: You will get no respect here. Don’t bother submitting fraudulent or misleading information in the guise of an article, because we will remove it. Any piece of content submitted on this site can be removed at the sole discretion of the Tycoon staff.